Thread on Apple's role in the closure of the Internet. From 2016 to 2023, Apple's App Store, half the mobile duopoly, went from a curated software marketplace to one of the most important content control systems on Earth.
In June 2016, Apple completely reorganized their App Store Review Guidelines into five pillars: Safety, Performance, Business, Design, and Legal.
Most of Apple's big decisions were not policy ones but specific removals that had a chilling effect on future discourse. In Aug 2018, Apple removed 5/6 Alex Jones podcasts for hate speech. This was done jointly with similar actions from Facebook, YouTube, and Spotify.
One demonstration of Apple's market power and the effect of their content control apparatus was their treatment of Tumblr. Apple removed Tumblr from the app store in 2018 over CSAM, which forced Tumblr to ban all NSFW content, which led to a 33% drop in users.
Apple also removed all vaping-related apps from their store Nov 2019.
Apple was one of the biggest players (along with Amazon and Google) in the destruction of Twitter alternative Parler in 2021 (banning them from the app store), explicitly because Parler's moderation practices were not to their liking.
Gab, another Twitter alternative, was never granted app store access in the first place, first being rejected in Dec 2016.
Apple has been extremely accommodating with the Chinese government's demands for data access and content control, banning VPN apps in China in 2017 and giving the Chinese government unrestricted access to Chinese user's iCloud data.
Apple also banned an app used by Hong Kong protestors in 2019 and removed the Taiwanese flag emoji at the CCP's request. Approximately 3200 apps are missing from the Chinese app store, roughly 1/3 of which are for political reasons.
Apple also did things like limit airdropping in China during the anti-lockdown protests in 2022 and banning Bible and Quran apps in China.
In the ~1989-2008 US debate wrt China, China bulls like Bill Clinton claimed that market access would make Chinese values more like the US, but the reverse happened, because the PRC learned to use its market power and supplier monopoly to coerce Western entities.
Tim Cook, to the ADL: "our values drive our curation systems" and "tech companies must stand by their values and remove content that promotes hate and white supremacy."
An admin for one of the biggest right-wing Facebook groups DM'd me with his impressions/experience with Facebook moderation and censorship (and gave me permission to post this thread). RW Facebook was big in 2016/17.
The big crackdown began in summer 2017; it did not take the form of bans for hate speech but rather all publicly-known admin accounts getting suspended for no reason, leading to the pages disappearing.
This included device bans which permanently destroyed most of the pages.
Thread on Anglosphere intelligence's role in the 2015-2023 closure of the Internet. Not a ton of evidence on the topic (obviously), so this thread isn't super dense. There was a huge surge in tech hiring of ex-FBI employees in 2018.
It is not inherently suspicious that ex-spooks go to Silicon Valley companies; many have expertise in cybersecurity and related fields. What IS suspicious is that so many flock to the content control/moderation roles (Trust and Safety etc).
For example, you have Meta product policy managers for disinformation (ex-CIA) and senior managers of Trust & Safety at Google (also ex-CIA).
Deplatforming of websites thread. This is when private web infrastructure actors (cloud providers, payment processors, DNS providers, DDoS protectors) coordinate to purge websites. Several layers of the web stack are oligopolies, so this can happen sans explicit coordination.
The first major case of infrastructure-level deplatforming was WikiLeaks in 2010, for releasing classified information obtained illegally (US diplomatic cables), referred to as "Cablegate," by AWS, EveryDNS, PayPal, Visa, Mastercard, and Bank of America.
The attacks on WikiLeaks were not ideological ones (they were committing actual crimes as a website), but the tactics (both deplatforming and extremely bogus sex "scandals" like sending love letters to a 19 year old), presaged later efforts during the Great Awokening.
In realistic resume-study settings, previous-generation (Sonnet 4) LLMs consistently prefer black to white and female to male applicants. These preferences are invisible in model chains-of-thought, which are thus unfaithful (don't correspond to actual decision process).
The same outcome but for sex rather than race.
Why does this matter? Well, LLMs enable resume spamming and then practically require their own use to filter them. With some effort, it is possible to remove these biases, as the authors of the paper show - but this effort needs to actually be made.
The entire male Manchu population was turned into fighters by the Aisin-Gioro clan (Qing) to conquer China. They were forbidden from doing anything but fight, and given privileges and Chinese slaves to sustain them. Over time, this made them decadent and useless.
Despite many Qing attempts to reverse Manchu decay, they, banned from working, eventually found themselves economically subjugated by their economically-productive and hardworking Chinese subjects. Sort of like Hegel's parable of the master and the slave.
As a result, the Qing dynasty came to rely primarily on their Mongol allies, who remained on the steppe rather than enter China, for their best soldiers, with footsoldiers/specialists filled out by Chinese (with Mongol or Manchu officers).
The most interesting thing in Facebook's evolution from mostly-free (albeit without pseudonymity) platform to aggressively controlled between 2015 and 2020 is how involved European governments were in the process (thread).
The most important thing about Facebook is that it can be used to reach the great mass of Gen X and Boomer adults who are not Internet natives and comprise most swing voters. Dark Facebook Manipulation from Russia and Vote Leave was blamed for both Trump 2016 and Brexit.
These two events provoked an avalanche of books, news articles, government reports, NGOs, and hearings (including in 2018 in the US Senate) about how Facebook microtargeting would end democracy. Example: