Zdenek Vrozina Profile picture
Mar 18 19 tweets 3 min read Read on X
An interesting and biologically plausible pilot study that provides a fairly strong signal that pediatric Long COVID may be associated with impaired microcirculation and increased arterial stiffness🧵
The study builds on earlier adult research suggesting that persistent symptoms after COVID may be linked to capillary loss and endothelial dysfunction.
This was an observational comparative cohort study, not a randomized or interventional trial.
The study included 37 pediatric patients with Long COVID and 46 healthy controls. On average, the patients were evaluated about 206 ± 167 days after a positive test, so often many months after the initial infection.
Most were adolescents. The average age in the LC group was 13.5 years. The most common symptoms were headache, reduced exercise tolerance, fatigue, and shortness of breath.
The patients were recruited from a specialized LC clinic, so they were not a random sample of all children who had COVID. This raises the possibility that the study captured a more symptomatic or more complex subgroup than the average child after infection.
The first method was sublingual SDF imaging, which looks at the tiny blood vessels under the tongue. They measured
MFI = quality of microvascular blood flow
TVD = total vessel density
PPV = proportion of perfused vessels
distribution of vessels by size
The second was EndoPAT, which provides indirect measures of
RHI as a marker of endothelial function
AIx@75 as a marker of arterial stiffness
Microcirculation
Compared with controls, children with Long COVID had
lower MFI
lower TVD
lower PPV
In simple terms, this suggests fewer small vessels and poorer perfusion.
The most pronounced changes were seen in the small vessel compartment, meaning the capillary side of the microcirculation. At the same time, the relative proportion of medium and large vessels was higher, which the authors interpret as a possible redistribution
Small-vessel TVD 4.61 vs 9.53 mm/mm²
small-vessel PPV 4.00% vs 9.21%
proportion of small vessels 29.97% vs 49.08%
Most of these differences were highly statistically significant!
Arterial stiffness
The LC group also had a higher AIx@75, which points to increased arterial stiffness. By contrast, RHI, the marker of endothelial reactivity, did not differ significantly between groups.
So the clearest signal was in microcirculation and arterial stiffness, but not in this particular endothelial function measure.
The differences remained significant even after statistical adjustment for age, BMI, blood pressure, and sex.
What is the significance of the findings in children with shortness of breath?
This is probably the most clinically interesting part of the paper. Children with shortness of breath had an even lower proportion of small vessels than children with Long COVID without dyspnea. The clearest association was mainly with capillary rarefaction.
The study fits well with the hypothesis that Long COVID may be (at least in part) a vascular and microvascular disorder. The authors mention several possible mechanisms
viral persistence or persistence of viral components
post-acute inflammation
autoimmunity
thrombotic processes
endothelial dysfunction
mitochondrial dysfunction
The control group was examined before the pandemic. That helps avoid the problem of unnoticed prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.
One of the key limitations?
No post COVID without Long COVID comparison group. Without that group, it is hard to know whether these vascular changes are truly specific to Long COVID, or whether some of them might occur more broadly after infection.
There was no long-term follow-up. We do not know whether the microcirculatory changes improve, worsen, or resolve over time.
The authors themselves state that impaired microcirculation and increased arterial stiffness may predispose patients to a higher long-term risk, for example of hypertension or atherosclerosis. @szupraha @ZdravkoOnline @adamvojtech86 @adamkova_vera @strakovka
Boever at al., Microcirculatory impairment and increased arterial stiffness in pediatric Long COVID patients. link.springer.com/article/10.100…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zdenek Vrozina

Zdenek Vrozina Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZdenekVrozina

Jun 23
New study in Journal of Sleep Research links long COVID to a higher burden of prodromal Parkinson's like features. 11,261 people, 16 countries.
The headline is weaker than it looks - but there is the one finding in this paper that should genuinely scare you, and almost nobody is quoting it 🧵
The main finding is mostly circular. The prodromal PD score is built from cognitive impairment, fatigue, depression, dysautonomia, anosmia, constipation. Those are long COVID. They renamed the long COVID symptom cluster prodromal PD and found long COVID predicts it.
Cognitive impairment carries OR 7.0 in their model. That's not a Parkinson's. That's brain fog wearing a different name tag.
Drop the six overlapping items and the effect barely moves aOR 1.73 - 1.66 because the overlap runs deeper than six items.
Read 21 tweets
Jun 22
In people with long COVID, arterial stiffness in the large vessels looked no different from people who’d recovered cleanly.
The deficit sits one level down - in the smallest vessels, and specifically in how fast they can react.🧵
A new paper from Tübingen measured microvascular reactivity - how quickly a muscle re-oxygenates after its blood supply is cut off for a few minutes and then released. That re-flooding step is called reperfusion. A near-infrared sensor on a forearm muscle tracks how oxygenated the tissue is throughout.
29 patients with symptoms lasting more than 12 months after infection and a real impact on daily life, against 33 people who had the same infection and recovered without trouble. Everyone was infected in 2020–2021.
Read 13 tweets
Jun 19
139 kids who'd had COVID. Half of them turned up with autoantibodies - antibodies that attack the body's own tissues. In uninfected kids, only 14%. And it barely mattered whether the child had been hospitalized with pneumonia or had next to no symptoms. 🧵
The study sorted the kids by how their infection went - mild/asymptomatic, severe COVID needing hospitalization, and MIS-C hyperinflammatory syndrome that shows up weeks after infection and hits several organs at once. Plus a group of healthy controls.
The kids were infected between June 2021 and November 2022 - Delta/Omicron era. The antibodies, meanwhile, were measured against the original Wuhan strain.
Read 13 tweets
Jun 18
New study. In some people, a mild case of COVID seems to leave a hidden edit in how their cells manage their own RNA - and it doesn't fully reset once the virus is gone. Another possible clue to why some bodies don't bounce back the same. 🧵
Your DNA is the master copy. RNA is the working copy your cells actually read to build proteins. A family of enzymes called ADAR can edit letters in that working copy - swapping an A so it now reads as a G - without ever touching the DNA.
Why edit your own RNA? One crucial job - it stamps the cell's own double-stranded RNA as ours. Without that stamp, the immune system's virus sensors can mistake your own RNA for an invader and switch on inflammation.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 14
Could the real trigger for Long COVID POTS be the immune system mistaking your own cells for the enemy? A new preprint makes the case that monocyte oxidative stress - not lingering virus - keeps the immune system switched on. Vanderbilt, 25 patients vs 15 recovered. 🧵
The headline finding.
Patients carry about 3× more doublets in their blood - T cells and monocytes stuck together. These used to get written off as a lab artifact. Turns out they're real, functional contacts where the cells are actively talking to each other. The body is working on something.
How do they know it's a real contact and not two cells bumping?
A technique called FRET, which measures whether two molecules are genuinely pressed together at the nanometer scale. The T cell's receptor and the molecule feeding it an antigen are sitting right on top of each other. That's a snapshot of active immune signaling, not coincidence.
Read 16 tweets
Jun 13
Independent virus families - different genomes, life cycles, target tissues - keep ending up at the same two points in the brain. They switch on the same inflammation machinery, and they jam the cell's protein clean up system. If so, the damage is mostly the body's reaction, not the virus itself. 🧵
This is the core argument of a new review - one of the few that looks at post-viral brain symptoms through mechanisms shared across many viruses, instead of one virus at a time.
Why that's interesting?
The proteins come from completely unrelated viruses - COVID (the spike S1, N protein), the flaviviruses (dengue, West Nile, Japanese encephalitis), and influenza. Nothing about them predicts a shared effect on the brain - yet it shows up anyway.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(