Zdenek Vrozina Profile picture
Mar 18 19 tweets 3 min read Read on X
An interesting and biologically plausible pilot study that provides a fairly strong signal that pediatric Long COVID may be associated with impaired microcirculation and increased arterial stiffness🧵
The study builds on earlier adult research suggesting that persistent symptoms after COVID may be linked to capillary loss and endothelial dysfunction.
This was an observational comparative cohort study, not a randomized or interventional trial.
The study included 37 pediatric patients with Long COVID and 46 healthy controls. On average, the patients were evaluated about 206 ± 167 days after a positive test, so often many months after the initial infection.
Most were adolescents. The average age in the LC group was 13.5 years. The most common symptoms were headache, reduced exercise tolerance, fatigue, and shortness of breath.
The patients were recruited from a specialized LC clinic, so they were not a random sample of all children who had COVID. This raises the possibility that the study captured a more symptomatic or more complex subgroup than the average child after infection.
The first method was sublingual SDF imaging, which looks at the tiny blood vessels under the tongue. They measured
MFI = quality of microvascular blood flow
TVD = total vessel density
PPV = proportion of perfused vessels
distribution of vessels by size
The second was EndoPAT, which provides indirect measures of
RHI as a marker of endothelial function
AIx@75 as a marker of arterial stiffness
Microcirculation
Compared with controls, children with Long COVID had
lower MFI
lower TVD
lower PPV
In simple terms, this suggests fewer small vessels and poorer perfusion.
The most pronounced changes were seen in the small vessel compartment, meaning the capillary side of the microcirculation. At the same time, the relative proportion of medium and large vessels was higher, which the authors interpret as a possible redistribution
Small-vessel TVD 4.61 vs 9.53 mm/mm²
small-vessel PPV 4.00% vs 9.21%
proportion of small vessels 29.97% vs 49.08%
Most of these differences were highly statistically significant!
Arterial stiffness
The LC group also had a higher AIx@75, which points to increased arterial stiffness. By contrast, RHI, the marker of endothelial reactivity, did not differ significantly between groups.
So the clearest signal was in microcirculation and arterial stiffness, but not in this particular endothelial function measure.
The differences remained significant even after statistical adjustment for age, BMI, blood pressure, and sex.
What is the significance of the findings in children with shortness of breath?
This is probably the most clinically interesting part of the paper. Children with shortness of breath had an even lower proportion of small vessels than children with Long COVID without dyspnea. The clearest association was mainly with capillary rarefaction.
The study fits well with the hypothesis that Long COVID may be (at least in part) a vascular and microvascular disorder. The authors mention several possible mechanisms
viral persistence or persistence of viral components
post-acute inflammation
autoimmunity
thrombotic processes
endothelial dysfunction
mitochondrial dysfunction
The control group was examined before the pandemic. That helps avoid the problem of unnoticed prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.
One of the key limitations?
No post COVID without Long COVID comparison group. Without that group, it is hard to know whether these vascular changes are truly specific to Long COVID, or whether some of them might occur more broadly after infection.
There was no long-term follow-up. We do not know whether the microcirculatory changes improve, worsen, or resolve over time.
The authors themselves state that impaired microcirculation and increased arterial stiffness may predispose patients to a higher long-term risk, for example of hypertension or atherosclerosis. @szupraha @ZdravkoOnline @adamvojtech86 @adamkova_vera @strakovka
Boever at al., Microcirculatory impairment and increased arterial stiffness in pediatric Long COVID patients. link.springer.com/article/10.100…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zdenek Vrozina

Zdenek Vrozina Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZdenekVrozina

Apr 28
A heart attack after COVID may not look like the classic heart attack we usually imagine.
A new core-lab study of patients with NSTEMI + COVID-19 suggests something more diffuse. Not just one blocked artery, but a blood-clotting and vessel inflammation problem🧵
First, two key terms.
STEMI is the type of heart attack where the ECG shows ST-segment elevation. It often means a major coronary artery is suddenly blocked.
NSTEMI is a heart attack without that classic ST elevation. It can be less obvious on ECG, but it is not minor.
So STEMI is often like a main pipe suddenly being blocked.
NSTEMI can be more complex. Partial blockage, smaller clots, multiple narrowed vessels, poor microvascular flow, or the heart being stressed by illness.
But COVID can add another layer.
Read 19 tweets
Apr 27
For 2025, the societal cost of Long COVID and ME/CFS in Germany is estimated at €64.4 billion - about 1.44% of GDP.
For Czechia, this would roughly translate to around CZK 120 billion per year if we apply the same share of GDP - 1.44% of the Czech economy.
A simple population-based conversion would produce a higher number (200 billion), but that is an overestimate.
This should matter to you, @strakovka.
Because this is what poor public health policy costs. Ignoring prevention, ventilation, surveillance, post-COVID care, and the long-term damage caused by repeated infections.
Read 18 tweets
Apr 27
A new systematic review looked at what happens to the heart after COVID - not during the acute infection, but months later.
The key point:
A normal ejection fraction does not always mean the heart is completely unaffected.🧵
In people assessed more than 12 weeks after PCR confirmed COVID - especially those with persistent cardiopulmonary symptoms - there is evidence of subtle, and sometimes persistent, cardiac involvement.
This may show up as
higher BNP/NT-proBNP
reduced LV-GLS
abnormalities on cardiac MRI
while LVEF often remains normal
Read 21 tweets
Apr 25
Exertion and PEM.
A new paper studied people with long COVID using a 2-day (!) submaximal CPET protocol, combined with NIRS measurement on the calf muscle.
The authors looked at what happens to breathing, performance, and muscle oxygenation during repeated exertion🧵
The key finding.
In the long COVID group, muscle tissue oxygen saturation (TSI%) initially increased during exercise, but it did not stay elevated for as long as it did in controls. (Thomas 2026)
On day 2, this pattern was even worse. In long COVID, TSI% stayed above resting levels for a shorter period, while controls maintained elevated muscle oxygenation more effectively during exercise.
Read 29 tweets
Apr 24
COVID-19 creates a state of immune dysregulation where the body may lose control over things it normally keeps suppressed - latent viruses, especially herpesviruses, and possibly even dormant cancer cells.
A new study on EBV and CD8 T cells fits into this bigger picture.🧵
The point is not simply that EBV can reactivate during COVID. We already have quite a lot of evidence for that.
In hospitalized patients with acute COVID, EBV reactivation was very common - around 68-73% - and it was seen not only in critical cases, but also in moderate disease.
The authors looked at EBV, CMV, HHV-6A and HHV-6B.

EBV dominated.
CMV and HHV-6B were detected only at low frequencies.
HHV-6A was not detected at all.
So this does not look like just random viral noise. EBV stands out.
Read 23 tweets
Apr 23
In this cohort, children exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in utero showed higher rates of developmental delay and were also more likely to screen positive on an autism screening tool than pre pandemic controls🧵
The developmental delay signal comes from the group’s earlier work in the same cohort. In the abstract, the authors cite a rate of 11.6% in 172 exposed children versus 1.6% in 128 pre pandemic controls.
The newer clinical piece in this paper is the autism screening result. Among 218 SARS2 exposed children, 22 screened positive on M-CHAT-R/F (10.1%). In the control group, 30 of 527 screened positive (5.7%).
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(