Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Live Law Profile picture
@LiveLawIndia
Mar 20 • 8 tweets • 2 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
#Mentioning| Plea by couple fleeing honor killing seeking protection

Adv: when we went to Tilak Marg polic station, to our surprise the police tried to detain us, for 2 days I them with me Image
CJI: if liberty is threatened in Delhi....

Adv: woh reels dekhte hai, unke yeh laga SC mein shaadiya hojaati hai...

CJI: why are you step-motherly behaving with art 226
CJI: you are a resident of Bihar / UP then go to Patna or Allahabad HC...

Adv: I shall go, definately...Justice Nath...since there is a global change, bache itne badal chuke, but there should be a place where they should be safe
CJI: kuch aise bhi case hai jaha ek banda 4-5 bache ka baap hai, woh bhi bhaag raha...

CJI: we are 100% sure they understand the value of this right to liberty, they can go to any HC, if they donot entertain then you come to us
Adv stresses for guidelines for the need to protect runaway couples
Adv: as a mother, citizen, lawyer... some house should be there, these children have not achieved that mental level
CJI: there are very unfortunate scenes happening in the HC also, parents are crying, telling the girl that he has not left his wife has chidlren, these things also need to be considered
Adv: Kindly grant some protection for atleast 3 days

CJI: you make this prayer before the HC, they will consider

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Live Law

Live Law Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LiveLawIndia

Live Law Profile picture
Mar 20
#UttarakhandHighCourt is hearing an FIR quashing plea moved by '#MohammadDeepak', a Kotdwar-based gym owner who, on January 26, confronted Bajrang Dal members who were allegedly objecting to a Muslim shopkeeper using 'Baba' in his shop's name. Image
Adv Navnish Negi (for Deepak): Till date, the persons whom I named in the complaint have not been booked.

Justice Thapliyal : Aap social media par ja jakar pravachan de rahe ho, matter ko sensationalise kar rahe ho. Aapne information de di police ko, ab police ko apna kaam karne dijiye. Koi kami najar aaye to aap bata sakte hain.

#MohammadDeepak
Negi: 26 January ko incident hota hai, jahan mere client ne matter ko de-escalate karne ko koshish ki. Maine koi video viral nahin kiya, yeh to opposite side se release kiya gaya.

#MohammadDeepak
Read 23 tweets
Live Law Profile picture
Mar 20
#SupremeCourt hears petition seeking guidelines on media briefing by the police Image
J Bagchi: the manual will restrain the police for making overenthusiastic briefings
J Bagchi: this will also stop the media from spinning the yarn and running the media trial

Sr Adv Gopal S : this all started with the Sahara Case

J Bagchi: then we were not dealing with intermediaries etc
Read 9 tweets
Live Law Profile picture
Mar 19
#UttarakhandHighCourt hears an FIR quashing plea moved by '#MohammadDeepak', a Kotdwar-based gym owner who, on January 26, confronted Bajrang Dal members who were allegedly objecting to a Muslim shopkeeper using 'Baba' in his shop's name. Image
Deepak is facing an FIR for the alleged offences of rioting, causing hurt and committing intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace.

His plea also prays for action against cops for their 'partisan' conduct and failure to act against hate crimes.

#MohammadDeepak
State Counsel: The petitioner has concealed a crucial fact : on his complaint, two FIRs have been lodged, but he says that no action was taken on his complaint.

#MohammadDeepak
Read 25 tweets
Live Law Profile picture
Mar 19
Delhi High Court hearing ED’s plea seeking expunging of adverse observations made by trial court while discharging Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and others in excise policy corruption case.

Matter before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma.

@dir_ed @ArvindKejriwal @msisodia Image
ASG SV Raju appears for ED.

Some Counsel for respondents seek time to file reply.

ED counsel Zoheb Hossain: No requirement of filing a reply.
Court to respondent counsel: I don’t understand. Here is an agency who says judge has exceeded jurisdiction. I told them even i make such observations. I was of the opinion i need to decide whether he exceeded jurisdiction. You said you will file reply. Now you say you need to read 600 pages. You need one more week, you take one more week.
Read 9 tweets
Live Law Profile picture
Mar 19
The Kerala High Court is hearing another plea challenging certification of the film 'The Kerala Story 2: Goes Beyond'

#KeralaHC #KeralaStory2 Image
Justice P.M. Manoj is considering the matter
The petitioner's counsel submitted that the certification is in violation of Rules 12, 13 and 17 of the Guidelines of the CBFC and also in derogation of Sections 191, 197 and 299 of the BNS
Read 10 tweets
Live Law Profile picture
Mar 19
#SupremeCourt quashes case against Elvish Yadav alleging that he used snake venom for his video and organized rave parties where drugs were consumed.

Bench: Justice MM Sundresh and Justice N Kotiswar. Image
Order: we are inclined only to go into two legal issues.

First issue is on the scope and applicability of section 2(23) of the NDPS Act. The second issue is with respect to complaint under Section 55 of the Wildlife Protection Act.
Order: learned senior counsel for the appellant submitted that the cognizance of the offence under NDPS Act is not maintainable as the psychotropic substance allegedly recovered from the co accused does not find place in the Schedule of the Act.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(