Victor Davis Hanson has spent fifty years studying how wars end. When he says the tide is turning, it's worth listening to why.
His argument isn't based on what the Pentagon is saying. It's based on how everyone else is behaving.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ป๐. VDH's rule: Europeans never agree to go anywhere near a conflict unless they think the winning side has already been determined. They didn't help in the early days. Now they're starting to move. That movement is not idealism. It's a calculation. They've looked at the battlefield and decided which way this ends.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐น๐ณ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ผ-๐ป๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐. The Saudis, the Emiratis, the Qataris โ these governments have survived for generations by reading the regional climate with precision. When they expel Iranian military attachรฉs, when they intercept Iranian missiles over their own capitals and say nothing about American strikes, when the UAE reaffirms its $1.4 trillion investment commitment to the United States mid-war โ they are not making ideological statements. They are placing bets. And they are betting on the United States.
๐๐น ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ. This is the one that should stop you cold. Al Jazeera โ the Qatari state media network, historically critical of American military action, the network Tucker Carlson and the anti-war right love to cite against Israel โ is now calling the U.S. bombing campaign brilliant and effective, and saying it has been underestimated. When the media outlet of a nation that hosts both the largest American air base in the Middle East and a Hamas political office starts praising American military effectiveness, the message is unmistakable: ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐บ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฌ ๐ธ๐ฆ'๐ณ๐ฆ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ธ๐ช๐ฏ.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐ฎ๐น. A-10 Warthogs and Apache helicopter gunships are now flying strike missions in Iranian airspace at will. VDH's point: you only deploy those aircraft when there is effectively no air defense left to threaten them. They are slow, low-flying, close-support platforms. Their presence confirms what the Pentagon has been claiming โ Iran has no meaningful air defense remaining.
Iran's strategy now is rope-a-dope. Run out the clock. Wait for American public opinion to shift. Hope the midterms create political pressure on Trump to stop. It is the only play they have left.
VDH's conclusion: if Trump sees it through โ and he believes he will โ the regime falls. Not in years. ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐ป.
W.C. Fields said that The Marx Brothers was the only act he couldn't follow on the live stage. He is known to have appeared on the same bill with them only once, during an engagement at Keith's Orpheum Theatre in Columbus, OH, in January 1915. At the time the Marx Brothers were
touring "Home Again," and it didn't take Fields long to realize how his quiet comedy juggling act was faring against the anarchy of the Marxes. Fields later wrote of the engagement (and the Marxes), "They sang, danced, played harp and kidded in zany style. Never saw so much
nepotism or such hilarious laughter in one act in my life. The only act I could never follow . . . I told the manager I broke my wrist and quit."
Groucho Marx suffered from insomnia, which he claimed was due to a financial loss in the stock market. On those evenings that he was
I had someone ask me about success as an author and how to get attention for your work... I figured I'd share, since I mentioned you (collectively) in the response:
"Thatโs the trickโhow to get attention for your work, especially if itโs deserving of such.
I look at 1/
2/ the cross section of writers who are six-figure or better earners and ask, โWhat are they doing different than the others that are not selling nearly as well?โ
Often the answer is a huge disparity in quality, but letโs assume the quality (which is subjective) is there,
3/ what do the successful people do?
They know how to network.
By that I mean they use resources like social media in a way that isnโt to vent their spleen or to post cat pictures or to even flog their book incessantlyโฆ they use it to make connections.
I copied this from a trucker's post which isn't public, but I thought others should read... it helps give us all a perspective on the day-in-the-life of others. Things can be tough, but there are good people out there that sometimes help get you over the tough times. Sometimes 1/
2/ it's just a pat on the back, other times it's an unexpected free meal.
Be one of the good guys... (below is the trucker's post)
"There are days I absolutely hate my profession..
I'm in little America wy.. I'm typically stop here when I come out this way.. I like to grab
3/ lunch here and grab an ice cream cone... Today.. I'm standing in line at the deli getting Ready to order..
And the young driver in front of me is counting pennies out of a plastic baggie so he can pay the $1.18 for some ramen noodles... He was short about 35 cents. He
What's interesting is that there are many conservative literary creatives out there, but for the vast majority of them, they're incognito. They don't show their hands and this runs the gamut of authors, agents, and even editors at the big publishers. How do I know? 1/
2/ I regularly have some folks reach out to me, thanking me for being a voice who isn't absolutely hair-on-fire, and representing the reasoned voice of conservatism in the literary scene. I'm in effect a proof point that we exist. Yet--the literary community is so toxic, that
3/ these people (and I'm talking VERY well known folks in literary) remain silent. Heck, in 2020 - one agency owner made one statement about not wanting the BLM riots to damage property and her entire agent retinue quit on her. That's how divided society is in that world.
Leftists resemble religious fanatics in the narrow range of their responses and inability to handle contradiction.
They systematically follow the same pattern in any debate:
1) they lie about being "tolerant" 2) claim that their opponent lacks knowledge 3) their arguments are
packed with logical fallacies 4) any sources they use are so biased as to be worthless 5) they accuse their opponent of being intolerant and "closed-minded" 6) they presume that their opponent holds certain views or is of a certain identity 7) claim that disagreement with their
views is "-phobic" (islamophobic, transphobic) 8) further disagreement is called "hateful" 9) personal insults will be used throughout the debate 10) when they fail to win with their personal attacks, they leave & block the person they debated