2/The growing strength is for larger & larger field strengths for higher & higher resolution
So why would we possible go backwards to lower field strength?
Turns out there are some advantages.
3/Low field strength magnets are much for flexible
They can be put in non-traditional settings (clinics) & can also possibly be moved to the bedside
It is truly POC MRI!
But how does it perform?
4/For infarcts, it tends to see the forest instead of the trees.
It is very good at detecting large infarcts & performs equivalently to normal field strengths
5/However, it can miss smaller infarcts or they can be much more difficult to see
But, with the advent of deep learning AI algorithms, the image quality can be enhanced to lower the risk of missing small findings
6/The question is: how good does the quality HAVE to be?
Yes, we may love amazing 3T images, but often, we don’t need that degree of image quality or detail to make the correct diagnosis.
Lower field strengths can suffice.
7/It’s like food.
Would you like a Michelin starred meal? Yes.
Do you really need it? No. Regular food is good enough to suffice.
8/And low field MRIs have a big advantage when it comes to susceptibility artifact
Larger field strengths are more sensitive to susceptibility—which can obscure pathology.
It’s just like how larger ears are more sensitive to noise—it’s not always a good thing!
9/You can see here how lower field strengths actually make the canal MORE visible than on higher field strength bc there is less susceptibility artifact from the patient’s hardware.
10/In this months @theAJNR, Rao et al. found low-field MRI was 92% sensitive & 86% specific for detecting infarcts in ventilated ICU patients
And it changed management in nearly 40%
11/Hopefully now you know that good things can often come in small field strengths!!
But this only scratches the surface!
Follow @theAJNR & check out the article for yourself:
@TheAJNR 2/Perfusion imaging is based on one principle: When you inject CT or MR intravenous contrast, the contrast flows w/blood & so contrast can be a surrogate marker for blood.
This is key, b/c we can track contrast—it changes CT density or MR signal so we can see where it goes.
@TheAJNR 3/So if we can track how contrast gets to the tissue (by changes in CT density or MR signal), then we can approximate how BLOOD is getting to the tissue.
And how much blood is getting to the tissue is what perfusion imaging is all about.
1/Do you get a Broca’s aphasia trying remember the location of Broca's area?
Does trying to remember inferior frontal gyrus anatomy leave you speechless?
Don't be at a loss for words when it comes to Broca's area
Here’s a 🧵to help you remember the anatomy of this key region!
2/Anatomy of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) is best seen on the sagittal images, where it looks like the McDonald’s arches.
So, to find this area on MR, I open the sagittal images & scroll until I see the arches. When it comes to this method of finding the IFG, i’m lovin it.
3/Inferior frontal gyrus also looks like a sideways 3, if you prefer. This 3 is helpful bc the inferior frontal gyrus has 3 parts—called pars
Brain MRI anatomy is best understood in terms of both form & function.
Here’s a short thread to help you to remember important functional brain anatomy--so you truly can clinically correlate!
2/Let’s start at the top. At the vertex is the superior frontal gyrus. This is easy to remember, bc it’s at the top—and being at the top is superior. It’s like the superior king at the top of the vertex.
3/It is also easy to recognize on imaging. It looks like a big thumb pointing straight up out of the brain. I always look for that thumbs up when I am looking for the superior frontal gyrus (SFG)
If the patient is symptomatic & the greatest stenosis from the plaque is >70% of the diameter of normal distal lumen, patient will likely benefit from carotid endarterectomy
But that doesn’t mean the remaining patients are just fine!
3/Yes, carotid plaques resulting in high-grade stenosis are high risk
But assuming that stenosis is the only mechanism by which a carotid plaque is high risk is like assuming that the only way to kill someone is by strangulation.