From @chrischirp.bsky.social's excellent substack:
"The overall conclusion is that the scale of deaths in the first wave could have been much lower and the devastating second wave could have been largely avoided."
@chrischirp "Tens of thousands of deaths could have been prevented. Mod 2 report lays out the missed opportunities, delayed decisions, a refusal to learn, a downplaying or failure to believe advice from SAGE, and a general unseriousness on the part of government"
@chrischirp "Professor Edmunds, who served on the SAGE modelling subgroup Spi-M, testified that the failure to act to control the second wave “was not because of a lack of situational awareness or knowledge of how to control it. We let this second wave happen.”"
3/13
@chrischirp "Professor McLean, now the UK’s Chief Scientific Advisor, described it as the worst period of pandemic, saying:
“We could see what was coming and could not understand why the government did not act upon the science advice by introducing effective interventions”"
4/13
@chrischirp "This isn’t speaking with the luxury of hindsight - witness after witness testified that SAGE was warning what was coming at the time. And it wasn’t just SAGE."
5/13
@chrischirp "The Academy of Medical Sciences published a detailed report in July 2020 (shared with the government via SAGE) on the need to prepare for a challenging winter, including advice on NHS resilience, contact tracing, and public health mitigations."
@chrischirp "Indie SAGE too published many reports that summer and autumn, on how to make contact tracing more effective, on how to improve testing, on safer return to work and study, the need to support people isolating."
@chrischirp "We highlighted the urgency of what was happening in the lead up to Christmas 2020 as things were spiralling out of control, and called for an emergency national lockdown almost two weeks before the government acted."
@chrischirp "So it is not simply that mistakes were made under pressure; it is that failing to prepare over the spring and summer of 2020 and then to act quickly as the situation worsened transferred risk and suffering onto hospitals, staff, patients and families."
9/13
@chrischirp "What makes it even more tragic is that the UK was the first country in the world to start vaccinating people - in early December just as the second wave was turbocharged by the new alpha variant."
@chrischirp "Our vaccine rollout was phenomenal - by mid-March 2021, over 25 million people had received at least one dose of Covid vaccine, which included over 95% of all adults over 65 years old."
Science is under siege. Political forces are undermining expertise, dismantling research institutions, and replacing evidence based policymaking with ideology.
This is a global crisis.
🧵
1/31
The covid-19 pandemic underscored the importance of scientific independence.
While vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics saved many lives, governments that ignored expert advice and downplayed the threat allowed lives to be lost.
2/31
Sometimes, it became a political battleground as public health experts were vilified and disinformation flourished, with deadly consequences.
3/31 bmj.com/content/379/bm…
Today the Royal Society will meet to discuss “Fellows’ behaviour”. Without doubt the fellow they will primarily be discussing is Elon Musk.
The behaviour may range from his public dissemination of unfounded conspiracy theories to his attacks on the science
🧵
1/38
Musk is also an important figure (some would argue the most important) within a US administration that is laying siege to science and to scientific inquiry itself.
2/38 researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-world-…
The new administration’s executive orders have restricted research, silenced climate scientists and cut funding, as part of a systematic targeting of the scientific community.
3/38
Here's what I think we should be doing to ensure that the UK (and indeed other non-US countries) does not suffer the same fate.
🧵
1/37
The United States is currently witnessing an unprecedented assault on its scientists and scientific institutions, driven by populist agendas that prioritise ideology over evidence.
These orchestrated attacks threaten the foundations...
Silence will not shield scientists from the consequences of an increasingly hostile political landscape.
UK and other non-US scientists must act to support our US colleagues.
Here's what I think we should be doing...
🧵
1/35
Science thrives on collaboration and openness.
The people who practice science are committed to seeking truth and combatting falsehoods.
2/35
In an era where political forces increasingly seek to distort, suppress, or co-opt scientific knowledge for ideological purposes, the global scientific community must recognise that staying silent in the face of these challenges is no longer an option.
Fiona Fox’s recent article in Research Professional News cautions that expelling Elon Musk from the Royal Society could undermine public trust in science.
I disagree...
🧵
1/25 researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-vie…
I think that this perspective overlooks the critical role that scientific institutions play in upholding ethical standards and defending the integrity of science, especially at times when science and scientists are subject to threats and intimidation from political institutions
2
It's imperative that scientists and their representative bodies actively engage in political discourse to protect scientific integrity, particularly when it is under direct threat, as has been clearly evidenced by recent developments in the United States
3 iflscience.com/us-science-is-…
After hearing some underwhelming testimony last month at the #COVIDInquiry on the use of respirators, @trishgreenhalgh and I decided to write a rapid response to the @bmj_latest to set the record straight.
Here's what we wrote...
1/15 bmj.com/content/386/bm…
"Respirators outperform surgical masks; fit-testing is desirable but not essential"
Professor Susan Hopkins (UK Covid Inquiry, 18th September 2024) claimed that evidence for the superiority of respirators (which are made to an industry standard and designed to fit ...
2/15
closely around the face) over medical facemasks (which are not generally made to any quality standard and often fit loosely, leaving gaps around the sides) is “weak”.
She also claimed that respirators are of little use if they are not fit-tested.
3/15 bmj.com/content/386/bm…