Post

DataRepublican (small r)

Mar 30 • 20 tweets • 14 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

🧵 THREAD: How mass immigration came to Japan's shores

𝕏 saw a lovely cultural exchange between Americans and Japanese this past week, which got me wondering how and why Muslims came to Japan... so I spent the weekend looking into it.

Japan went from officially having "no immigration policy" to a formal system with a cap of 820,000 foreign workers. Japan's Muslim population has gone from ~110,000 (2010) to ~420,000 (end of 2024). There are now 149 mosques.

The bill that created this was passed at 4:00 AM in December 2018. The opposition called it a "carte blanche." Deliberations were compressed. It passed anyway.

What I found:
🔹 Three consecutive foreign ministers trained at American universities.
🔹 A foundation run by a Trilateral Commission member and a former US intelligence chief.
🔹 A $69 million fellowship network seeding 69 universities in 44 countries.
🔹 A UN framework signed the same month as the 4 AM vote.
🔹 Sixteen bilateral labor agreements managed through a single coordinating body.
🔹 A Japan-specific immigration program drafted by a Japanese national while he was interning inside the US Senate.

In July 2025, a party that didn't exist before COVID won 14 seats and finished third in the popular vote. By February 2026, the LDP won its biggest parliamentary majority since 1955, running on tighter immigration.

Unfortunately, Americans and Japanese have more in common beyond love of BBQ. They have the mass migration problem in common. Receipts below. 👇

As always, patience as I pull together the thread.

Japan's Muslim population:

2010: ~110,000
2024: ~420,000

Nearly 4x in 14 years.

Mosques: 4 in 1980. 149 as of 2024.

This is not organic. Someone built a pipeline.

The Specified Skilled Worker program. SSW.

Original cap (2019): 345,000 workers.
New cap (March 2024): 820,000 workers.

The law that created SSW passed at **4:00 AM** on December 8, 2018.

The opposition called it a "carte blanche." Deliberations were rushed.

Japan had three consecutive foreign ministers during the immigration expansion era.

All three are connected to American universities.

Let me introduce them.

Foreign Minister #1: Taro Kono (2017–2019).

Graduated from Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, 1986.

Georgetown SFS is where America trains its foreign policy elite; Bill Clinton graduated there. Madeleine Albright. CIA directors. State Department officials.

Kono returned to Georgetown as Foreign Minister in 2018 to give a lecture, while the SSW bill was being drafted.

Foreign Minister #2: Toshimitsu Motegi (2019–2021), and now again since 2025, has good relationship with President Trump.

Nonetheless, he has a master's degree from Harvard Kennedy School of Government.

Harvard KSG is America's most influential graduate school for training future government officials and technocrats. It produces prime ministers, finance ministers, and central bankers around the world.

Foreign Minister #3: Yoshimasa Hayashi (2021–2023).

MPA from Harvard Kennedy School, 1994.

Before Harvard, Hayashi interned inside the US Senate ... for Senator William Roth. While there, he drafted the blueprint for the Mansfield Fellowship Program.

Congress passed it in 1994. It places US federal employees inside Japanese government ministries.

The Mansfield Fellowship Program.

Since 1994: 208+ US federal employees from nearly 30 federal agencies placed inside Japanese government ministries.

Two-year program. Ten months working directly inside Japanese agencies.

The man who drafted this legislation as a Senate intern became Japan's Foreign Minister. In 2022, he supervised its expansion.

The driving force behind the 4 AM vote: Yoshihide Suga.

Chief Cabinet Secretary 2012–2020. He "championed" the SSW program and "emphasised the urgency" as the vote was called before dawn.

Also worth noting: Keidanren (Japan's most powerful business federation) publicly demanded more foreign workers.

Keidanren Chairman Hiroaki Nakanishi (2018–2021) — Stanford University educated — was in the chair when the bill passed.

Now for the international layer.

Japan joined the International Organization for Migration (IOM) as a member state in 1993, and gives almost 20 million dollars annually.

IOM's mission for Japan: help shape a society where people on the move "enrich" both themselves and the local communities.

The same month as the 4 AM vote — December 2018 — Japan participated in the adoption of the **Global Compact for Migration** in Marrakech.

The GCM is aligned with SDG Target 10.7: "facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration."

Japan, as a signatory to the 2030 Agenda, committed to this target.

The normative framework and the domestic legislation arrived together.

How do workers actually flow into Japan? Through 16 bilateral agreements managed by JITCO - Japan International Trainee & Skilled Worker Cooperation Organization.

Sending countries: Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines, Cambodia, Bangladesh, and more. Bangladesh is 91% Muslim.

There's also JICA, Japan's foreign aid agency. American equivalent is USAID.

JICA contracted the ILO to build migrant worker protection infrastructure in Cambodia, Indonesia, and Vietnam.

JICA also helped plan for 100,000 Indonesian workers to come to Japan over five years.

Japan's own aid agency is building the supply-side pipeline.

None of these agreements — the IOM membership, the Global Compact signature, the JICA 100,000-worker plan — were ever put to a public vote.

They were negotiated between government agencies and international bodies.

Does the Japanese public know of this?

Now I want to tell you about the Sasakawa Peace Foundation (SPF).

SPF is one of Japan's largest private foundations.

Its active programs include: "Building Models Towards Inclusive Society" focused on what it calls "the movement of peoples."

SPF Chairman from 2016–2020: Nobuo Tanaka.

He is a listed member of the Trilateral Commission.

The Trilateral Commission was founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller. Its purpose: coordinate policy among North American, European, and East Asian elites. A 1975 report famously worried about "too much democracy."

Tanaka also served as Executive Director of the International Energy Agency (Paris, 2007–2011) and as Japan's Minister for Industry & Energy in Washington DC.

SPF's US branch is chaired by Admiral Dennis Blair.

Blair was director of National Intelligence (DNI) under President Obama — the top intelligence official in the US government

He chairs the Japan foundation's American operations.

SPF's fellowship program SYLFF (Ryoichi Sasakawa Young Leaders Fellowship Fund) has put $1 million endowments into 69 universities in 44 countries since 1987.

15,000+ students have received fellowships.

The goal: develop future policy leaders who share SPF's values.

SPF also co-hosted a democracy workshop with Freedom House and brought NED, NDI, IRI, and JICA together in 2019.

Americans are arguing about immigration architecture.

Japanese are arguing about immigration architecture.

We're using different words. Different names. But when I look at the structure, the American-educated technocrats, the international bodies, the foundation network, the business lobbying, the midnight votes, the public that wasn't asked...

It's the same blueprint.

Maybe Americans and Japanese should compare notes.

THREAD END.

https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1997379160436879437

Since others have asked, here's a prior thread I did on mass migration in the USA:

https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1997379160436879437

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

More from @DataRepublican

DataRepublican (small r)

@DataRepublican

Apr 23

🧵 THREAD: You've heard the phrase "OUR DEMOCRACY" a million times. But what exactly is "OUR DEMOCRACY"? 🤔

When they say "democracy," they don't mean a republic. They don't mean consent of the governed. They don't mean your right to choose your own leaders.

They mean a system where "institutions" - NGOs, multilaterals, the permanent bureaucracy - advance a set of values they consider settled: equality, social justice, cosmopolitanism, global governance. These values aren't proposals to be voted on. They're treated as moral prerequisites that must be true *before* your vote counts.

Despite what they say, they aren't for checks and balances. Checks and balances limit what government can do to you. This limits what you can do to *them*. The brakes are on accountability, not power. The institutions that set the boundaries of acceptable policy have put themselves beyond the reach of the electorate, and they call that arrangement "democracy."

Trump has been an existential threat to this system since the moment he said "drain the swamp" ... because the swamp IS the system. When he threatened those institutions, he didn't threaten the republic. He threatened their immunity from it.

And they said so. On camera. At their own events. In their own words.

As always, patience as I pull together the thread.👇

Robert Kagan:
"I would say there is an argument for saying give me some smoke filled rooms... they weeded out the Donald Trumps of this world."

Backroom deals instead of primaries. Because primaries are how you got Trump... and the old gatekeepers would have stopped him.

Think Kagan's an outlier? Here's Brookings senior fellow William Galston at the National Endowment for Democracy's (NED) most prestigious annual lecture.

He explains that "liberal democracy" requires "some abridgement of majoritarianism."

Translation: democracy means limiting what the majority can do.

Read 14 tweets

DataRepublican (small r)

@DataRepublican

Apr 22

🧵🚨 THREAD: How the Charlottesville rally and SPLC birthed an entire billion-dollar-plus "democracy" ecosystem 🚨

11 federal counts. Wire fraud. Money laundering conspiracy. But here's what the SPLC headlines are missing:

• The indictment describes a paid informant in the leadership chat that PLANNED Unite the Right
• That informant "helped coordinate transportation" to the rally... at SPLC's direction
• There is ONE publicly identified organizer whose documented role was transportation coordinator
• His Discord posts about running over protesters were made 26 DAYS before Heather Heyer was killed by a car
• The indictment says postings were made "under the supervision of the SPLC"
• Charlottesville then became the founding event for a billion-dollar political machine
• SPLC installed itself as that machine's definitional gatekeeper

I report. You draw your own conclusions.

As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇

It is NOT confirmed fact that Chesny, who appeared to be encouraging running over protesters, was SPLC's informant.

But the indictment (paragraph 11a) describes informant F-37, and it matches Chesny:

• Member of the online leadership chat that planned Unite the Right
• Attended Charlottesville (at SPLC's direction)
• Made racist postings (under SPLC's supervision)
• Helped coordinate transportation for attendees

Now here's why this matters beyond the fraud charges.

Charlottesville became the single most consequential founding event in modern American political infrastructure. Every one of these organizations says... in their own words.... that they exist or were transformed because of August 12, 2017.

👇

Read 12 tweets

DataRepublican (small r)

@DataRepublican

Apr 21

🧵 THREAD: The true reason Pete Hegseth is being targeted is because he's standing between President Trump and a coup

@PeteHegseth named the institutions... CFR, Brookings, the general class... in 37 seconds in a video by @Liz_Wheeler . Within 72 hours of his nomination, a color revolution planning document cited him as an insider threat.

They didn't go after him because of drinking. They didn't go after him because of women. They went after him because every color revolution manual ever written says the same thing: you cannot topple a government unless the security forces defect. And a loyal Secretary of Defense is the one person who makes sure they don't.

I have the receipts. Their own documents. Their own training sessions. Their own words on camera.

As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler This is not my theory. This is theirs.

Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan — the two most cited scholars in the color revolution field — studied 323 regime change campaigns. Their finding:

Security force defections make campaigns FORTY-SIX TIMES more likely to succeed.

@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler So what did co-author Maria Stephan do next?

She became Chief Organizer of the Horizons Project. And on July 16, 2025, she trained New Kings participants on video.

"Security forces refused to obey orders to repress protesters."

Read 19 tweets

DataRepublican (small r)

@DataRepublican

Apr 16

🚨🧵 THREAD: Braver Angels says they're bipartisan and just bringing people together. Their own leadership coordinates with an anti-Trump political infrastructure network.🚨

This thread is not about BA's members. Many are sincere, and I thank @wilksopinion and @JohnRWoodJr for communicating with me.

This is about the infrastructure steering them: IMIP.

On August 18, 2025, Harry Boyte, a former Democratic Socialists of America board member, YES, that DSA announced Maury Giles' new role as Braver Angels CEO on video and their shift in strategy from depolarization to civic action:

"David has put together a featured plenary at the National Conference on Citizenship... which will be a launch of a new stage for Braver Angels that some of us have been working on for a while."

IMIP is the Inter-Movement Impact Project. It coordinates BA's strategic direction. Its own May 2025 document quotes David Brooks approvingly:

"Short term: Stop Trump. Foil his efforts. Pile on the lawsuits."

Braver Angels' members are bipartisan. Their leadership is adjacent to anti-Trump infrastructure. This thread has all the receipts.

As always, patience as I pull together the thread.👇

@wilksopinion @JohnRWoodJr IMIP's own document from May 5, 2025 quotes David Brooks and calls for a nationwide civic uprising:

"Short term: Stop Trump. Foil his efforts. Pile on the lawsuits. Turn some of his followers against him."

Then: "IMIP has been working to help answer [this] since late 2017."

@wilksopinion @JohnRWoodJr Walt Roberts runs IMIP. June 30, 2025:

"We've adopted Rachel Kleinfeld's strategy number four as our thing... a broad-based, multi-stranded, pro-democracy movement."

Flood the country with NGOs (including Braver Angels) is strategy #4. What are the other four strategies?

Read 22 tweets

DataRepublican (small r)

@DataRepublican

Apr 15

Hello Mr. Woods, (1/4)

I appreciate you engaging, sincerely. You're one of the few people in this space who actually responded, and your tone was decent. So I want to return the courtesy... and this is my first multi-part Hello.

You wrote: "Is any organized effort that involves people working from across the aisle necessarily a conspiracy?"

No. It isn't. And I haven't called it one. I've called it what it is: a funded, coordinated, strategically managed field.

Let me start with you.

You are the National Ambassador of Braver Angels. Braver Angels pulled in $5,651,273 in 2024, up from $958,681 in 2019... mostly from major foundations.

But your public videos repeatedly frame it as a "grassroots" or "national citizens" movement.

These two things cannot both be true. A $5.6 million-per-year operation funded predominantly by major foundations is not a grassroots citizens movement. It is a professionally managed nonprofit. There is nothing wrong with that... unless you describe it as something it isn't.

(2/4)
Now, here's where it gets interesting. And here's where I think you may genuinely not know the full picture.

In the above video clip, you say:

"We are in this moment where the depolarization movement I think is beginning to coalesce. I mean, I think you and I are in a position to sort of feel it. Braver Angels, Millennial Action Project, all of the amazing organizations in New Pluralists, National Conversations Project."

You named New Pluralists by name. So let's talk about what New Pluralists actually is.

In 2017, Mark Gerzon, president of the Mediators Foundation, consultant to the United Nations Development Programme, distinguished fellow at the EastWest Institute, organized a private meeting of major political funders at the Rockefeller Brothers Fund's Pocantico Conference Center. Representatives of both the Koch and Soros networks were in the room. The project was co-launched by Stephen Heintz, President of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

Out of that meeting came the New Pluralists.

Today, New Pluralists is a funder collaborative, not a standalone nonprofit. It is fiscally sponsored by Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors. Templeton, Hewlett, Einhorn, Fetzer, Klarman, Lubetzky, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund are all partners. MacKenzie Scott gave $4 million. The stated goal is $100 million over a decade.

Braver Angels is listed as one of approximately 60 "Field Builders." So is Tim Shriver's Dignity Index. So is Horizons Project. So is David French.

The same foundations that fund the New Pluralists collaborative also fund Braver Angels directly. Templeton gave $1.26 million to Braver Angels. Hewlett gave at least $75,000 plus undisclosed seed funding. They are also governing partners of New Pluralists. The money goes to the funder collaborative AND to the organizations the collaborative funds. It is the same pipeline.

You described this as "a moment where the depolarization movement is beginning to coalesce." New Pluralist's strategic plan describes it as a $100 million coordinated investment in field infrastructure. Both descriptions are accurate. The difference is yours sounds organic. Theirs sounds like what it is.

(3/4)
You wrote: "I do know Tim Shriver. He and I did a Braver Angels podcast together."

Good. Then you know who runs the Dignity Index.

The Dignity Index is operated by Project Unite. Its theoretical framework was developed by Donna Hicks, a Harvard specialist in international conflict resolution. Its framework was designed for mediating foreign wars. Then it was applied to scoring American political speech on a 1-8 contempt-to-dignity scale. In Utah. And it was piloted at UVU, the same campus where Charlie Kirk was assassinated.

One of the official websites to come out of the Biden White House's "United We Stand" summit was dignity[.]us. That URL now points to the Dignity Index.

Braver Angels has a formal partnership with the Dignity Index. You announced it. The pledge: "connect all 124 Braver Angels alliances" with Dignity Index training.

You wrote in your thread: "The Dignity Index, as I understand it, is meant to be a tool for holding all politicians accountable."

With respect... "as I understand it" is doing a lot of work in that sentence. The Dignity Index was built on a foreign conflict resolution framework, launched from a White House summit that identified populist movements as domestic threats, and piloted in the same Utah institutional ecosystem that was hosting MWEG conferences for three consecutive years at UVU. None of that requires a conspiracy. All of it is documented. Most of it is on their own websites.

Read 4 tweets

DataRepublican (small r)

@DataRepublican

Apr 14

🧵🚨 THREAD: Charlie Kirk was assassinated at Utah Valley University. Within TWO HOURS, leaders of 7 "bridge-building" organizations assembled on a conference call. Why so fast? Because UVU was THEIR campus. 🚨

This is Maury Giles, incoming CEO of Braver Angels, admitting on camera at the National Conference on Citizenship:

"Within two hours of the assassination, a group of us, all Utahns, we gathered on a call. We'd become friends over the last 5 years through our work in the community. And we also happen to be leaders in seven different national organizations that work in civic renewal."

Two hours. Seven national organizations. But this wasn't a spontaneous reaction to a tragedy. This was a network protecting its home turf. Because UVU wasn't just the place where Kirk was shot. It was the institutional center of the entire bridge-building / Dignity Index apparatus... and had been for years.

And the kicker?

These seven national organizations don't hide their own intent: replicate color revolution tactics in the United States. And, yes, that includes MWEG - Mormon Women for Ethical Government.

I have the receipts... they all admitted this on camera.

As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇

MWEG on their own GROW video:

"UVU has sponsored for us for the past three years so that we can have it there on their campus."

UVU SPONSORED their annual conference for three consecutive years. UVU is not a neutral venue in this story. It's a partner.

A speaker on MWEG's own Civics Learning Week video from 2023 admits she got a faculty position at UVU partly BECAUSE she was involved with Braver Angels... the same organization whose incoming CEO organized the two-hour call after Kirk was killed.