/1🚨UNCOVERED — Internal documents show that Oregon officials knew they lacked cause to sue the Trump Administration over its new regulations intended to prevent illegal aliens from receiving welfare.
They filed the lawsuit anyway.
/2 On July 21, 2025, twenty states and the District of Columbia sued the U.S. Department of Justice and other federal agencies, alleging that providing legal residency status verification to the federal government would cause irreparable harm.
/3 In their lawsuit, the plaintiff states allege that they would be harmed by having to “dramatically restructure” their welfare programs.
/4 AFL filed records requests with the plaintiffs, asking for examples of their alleged harm.
/5 Oregon’s Department of Human Services (ODHS) recently produced records and communications in response to AFL’s request.
/6 The records reveal that ODHS officials repeatedly determined that the Trump Administration’s new welfare regulations would not impact the vast majority of those receiving services and benefits from ODHS — weeks before Oregon jointly filed the lawsuit.
/7 Specifically, ODHS’s Public Affairs and Communications Director produced a statement that said:
“It’s important to assure people receiving services and benefits from ODHS that nothing is changing immediately because of this new policy. They should continue to use their services and benefits.”
/8 Additionally, the records revealed that ODHS officials specifically stated in comments while drafting ODHS’ statement that the vast majority of qualified non-citizens would NOT be affected.
/9 An ODHS official said:
“The following qualified non-citizens can still access these benefits: Lawful Permanent Residents, Refugees, Asylees, Individuals granted parole into the U.S. for at least 1 year, Battered spouses/children with pending immigration relief, & COFA migrants.”
/10 Despite their own officials’ statements saying otherwise, Oregon’s joint lawsuit alleges these new regulations would cause chaos and that qualified non-citizens would lose benefits.
/11 AFL’s ongoing investigation into the plaintiff states’ claims has revealed a clear pattern.
These blue states are repeatedly filing lawsuits with no evidence, running to the courts solely for political theater.
/12 AFL will continue investigating lawfare aimed at impeding the Trump Administration’s lawful actions.
The U.S. Department of Energy has opened a public comment period on AFL’s petition calling for the rescission of an unlawful Biden-era DEI contracting regulation.
The deadline for members of the public to submit public comments is Thursday, April 9.
/2 AFL’s petition, filed in January, asks DOE to rescind a regulation requiring DOE management and operating contractors to adopt and maintain race- and sex-based DEI plans and to submit them annually as a condition of doing business with the federal government.
/3 This Biden-era rule conflicts with federal civil rights law and pressures contractors to sort, evaluate, and favor workers based on race and sex.
/1🚨EXPOSED — The Deep State’s Global Population Control Plan:
A newly retracted intelligence assessment reveals the CIA identified higher birth rates in third-world countries as a threat to global economic development — and came up with a plan to “address it.”
/2 The 2020 CIA intelligence assessment titled “Worldwide: Pandemic-Related Contraceptive Shortfalls Threaten Economic Development” warned that the COVID-19 pandemic was limiting contraception access and undermining efforts to address population pressure in the developing world.
/3 This intelligence assessment, produced by the CIA’s Directorate of Analysis, Office of Global Issues, is 1 of 19 intelligence products that “did not meet CIA and IC analytic tradecraft standards and FAILED TO BE INDEPENDENT OF POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS.
/1🚨EXPOSED — AFL has released a report finding that 80% of the American Bar Association’s filings from the last decade support leftist causes and lawfare against President Trump.
The ABA is not a neutral arbiter and does not deserve to be treated like one.
/2 AFL’s examination of the ABA’s amicus brief program, which includes 87 briefs filed from April 2016 to February 2026, reveals that 80% of the organization’s filings advocated for liberal or progressive outcomes.
/3 It also reveals a 100% opposition rate to the Trump Administration across both President Trump’s first and second terms, in cases in which the ABA filed a brief.
/1🚨EXPOSED — Biden CIA’s War on Motherhood:
Newly released CIA documents reveal the Biden Administration identified “motherhood” and “homemaking” as indicators of “white racially and ethnically motivated violent extremism” (REMVE).
/2 The intelligence assessment reveals the top-to-bottom bias at Biden’s CIA.
An agency with critical intelligence responsibilities was spending its resources targeting women promoting motherhood.
/3 The Trump Administration recently retracted a 2021 intelligence assessment titled “Women Advancing White Racially and Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremist Radicalization and Recruitment.”
/1🚨NEW — The Eleventh Circuit should affirm Judge Cannon’s ruling and order the destruction of Volume II of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s UNCONSTITUTIONAL investigation into President Trump.
/2 AFL’s amicus brief, filed in United States v. Knight First Amendment Institute, argues that because Volume II is the product of an unconstitutional investigation, it is not subject to the Federal Records Act and therefore does not need to be preserved under those provisions.
/3 AFL also argues that even if Volume II is subject to the Federal Records Act, it would still qualify for authorized disposition under the Records Disposal Act, and its disclosure would be prohibited by the Privacy Act of 1974.
AFL has released an updated parental opt-out template letter following SCOTUS’s decision in Mirabelli v. Bonta, reaffirming parents’ constitutional right to direct their children’s upbringing and education.
/2 AFL’s updated template letter incorporates the Supreme Court’s ruling in Mirabelli v. Bonta: schools may not facilitate a child’s “gender transition” without parental consent.
/3 Specifically, the revised template enables parents to demand notice and an opportunity to opt out of instruction or activities involving: