Dennis Noel Kavanagh Profile picture
Apr 8 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
1/ Sen. Wiener cuts a haunted, panicked figure, like a man who's seen the ghost of Gender Future, but unlike Scrooge, there's no hope of some act of redemption or contrition. This is a man who prefers his collateral human damage to have no tongue, so he moves like a malfunction.
2/ The bitter harvest of gender, a crop Senator Scott did so much to bring about, was never going to be an easy or pretty affair for him. The shape of things to come was always going to be the innocent complaining of their own shapelessness. Cut to fit in to the point they do not
3/ So often the Gendocrat class Weiner belongs to can write these people off, "let them eat puberty blockers", "only 1% ever complain" etc. But the flippant dismissals of aristocrats have a poor historical pedigree and now Scott faces his rhetorical and metaphorical guiloteen.
4/ Having positioned himself as some scion of gay male political activism Scott now faces a nemesis worthy of Shakespeare. A young, innocent gay man pointing out to him what was contemporaneously bloody obvious to us. For which Scott and pals pilloried and cancelled us.
5/ Sen. Weiner, you have been more than complicit in a barbaric and insidious form of gay conversion. A form that told young men not that the world should change to accept them as they are, but that they should be cut and drugged so fit in. This will be your political epitaph
6/ When all the dust on this one day settles, Sen Weiner, you will be a historical absurdity, a gay man who actively campaigned for an ideology that harmed gay men. No wonder you twitch and stroke your chin. No wonder you look like a hunted animal. I think you can feel a reckoning coming.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dennis Noel Kavanagh

Dennis Noel Kavanagh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jebadoo2

May 29
1/ Yet again, the BBC frame this issue as an emotive plea for personal liberty and understanding. This is legally illiterate and glosses over the fact that trans activists seek the complete destruction of the category of sex in law with all the implications that has. Such as...
2/ Women's prisons. Women's sports. Women's private spaces for the purposes of dignity, safety and security.

This has a knock on effect on gay and lesbian rights. If there's no coherent sex category in law, you can't have the same sex orientation protected characteristic.
3/ It is presently unlawful in Australia for lesbians to meet in taxpayer funded public buildings and many lesbians have gone back to underground secretive arrangements. That is the prospectus Nick is pushing here with his ill informed approach centred on personal liberty.
Read 6 tweets
May 21
1/ Transvestites have finally been told "no" today, and it's at least 10 year overdue. It's no surprise to any of us that the middle class sensibilities of the media want to focus on sad transvestites rather than raped women in shelters or autistic kids given puberty blockers.
2/ This extraordinary movement of men in dresses literally went to the supreme court and tried to render the gay/lesbian protected characteristic "meaningless" in the words of the law lords and ladies. They literally tried to get their rights by taking ours. Image
3/ And that's just the gay right's angle. If they had won, there would be no such thing as female sports, the female prison estate, female only political association, they would have destroyed the legal concept of female. Because, let's be honest, male was never their goal.
Read 11 tweets
May 15
1/ Well, I've skimmed Giggle v Tickle and my conclusion is that the judgment is firmly in the category of being "a bit bloody silly". It is not normal to have Judges using activist language, but this judgment talks about cisgender and sex assigned at birth and the rest of it.... Image
Image
2/ What this case shows is that once you put "gender identity" into legislation you make it unlawful for people not to believe everyone has magic gender souls. That is a pretty extreme outcome and it's clear the case Forstater would have failed in Australia. Image
3/ This is a frankly Orwellian position for the law to be in, here we have Judges ruling that everyone has a magic gender soul and drafting judgments on the basis such a contested fiction is a verifiable fact. That is extremely close to a religious blasphemy ruling. Image
Read 14 tweets
Apr 15
1/ Up until today it was unlawful for lesbians to have a lesbian only meeting in a publicly funded "pride centre" in Oz. That hasn't technically changed today as a matter of law, but the Federal Court has basically just said it bloody better change soon. By way of explainer...
2/ The LAG are up against Australia's EHRC, the Australian Human Rights Commission. What you need to know about the AHRC is that they are gender loons who always prefer the interests of transvestites over the rights of lesbians. All you need to know about LAG is they're tough.
3/ So the story begins with the LAG applying to the AHRC for an "exemption" to an obnoxious piece of law that says lesbians meeting without men is discrimination against transvestites. LAG want such a meeting. AHRC unsurprisingly say no and are judge and jury for that application
Read 18 tweets
Apr 12
1/ I'm getting a bit sick of "anonymous government sources" (ie Bridget Phillipson's SPADs) writing off For Women Scotland as "culture wars". Let us remember the Scottish Government in FWS literally tried to abolish the legal category of sex and sexual orientation.
2/ Had they prevailed, gays and lesbians would have lost the right to single sex associations under the Equality Act, furthermore, gay and lesbian as categories would effectively be rendered "meaningless" in law (to quote the law lords).

3/ That in turn would have seriously adversely affected any protected characteristic claim we might want to bring effectively turning any direct discrimination case into a much more complex indirect discrimination case. That's a pretty bold assault on gay and lesbian rights.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 27
1/ Whether we like it or not, there is a shadow falling over Western discourse, the harbingers of this new "body as commodity" cult speak in honeyed words of "choice" and "autonomy" and "kindness", but lurking behind those terms is something unmistakably and viscerally dark.
2/ We are entering a phase of history where some people are deemed too broken, too troublesome, too old, too damaged and most importantly too inconvenient to possibly save. The days of enlightened and compassionate superintending of people in extremis are over in Span at least.
3/ This is the prospectus the ghouls at Dignity in Dying and their bovine MPs don't want you to see. This is the dirty little secret of a world in which politics is conducted without context and where liars pretend no one is ever coerced, damaged, hurt or feels a burden.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(