* Bubiyan Island is home to Mubarak Al Kabeer Port, which frequently sees roll-on/roll-off ships used for connecting heavy equipment between Kuwait and other gulf countries.
* It also faces the shallow landing port side of Kharg island.
3/11
* The US has relocated forces from Kuwait to a makeshift base on the island, apparently containing munitions and satellite equipment.
* That base was suddenly struck on April 6th, likely with intel support from China or Russia.
4/11
* It was after this that we suddenly see the desperate “ceasefire” plan from the Pakistani Prime Minister dramatically start to escalate.
* The next day we see his public ceasefire message which many now believe were written by Washington.
* This led to the US suddenly “agreeing” to basically any terms - much to the surprise of Israel.
5/11
* The US turned around the B-52s and declared peace.
* Almost immediately it becomes clear neither side agree on deal terms, and statements get walked back.
So why the sudden position change from the US?
6/11
Nearly all US assets in the Gulf region are in the Arabian Sea, with no way to Kharg.
And because of the mountainous coast line, those landing dock ships are basically only useful in an assault on the port city of Bandar Abbas.
7/11
With no landing craft and minimal covering interceptors, an assault on Kharg would be dangerous.
It would involve small, slow vulnerable craft, or converting commandeered commercial vessels.
8/11
It would also require striking defensive infrastructure in the island, which the US happened to do before their own deadline.
9/11
It seems likely that the US had a plan to:
* Attack somewhere in Southern Iran with sea assets, possibly even as far as Bandar Abbas or Qeshm.
* Use that distraction to launch an assault on Kharg from Bubiyan Island - using commercial ships to transport heavy loads to the existing Kharg docks.
10/11
* Whatever Iran hit on Bubiyan included critical munitions, or transports for that assault.
* So Trump “agreed” to a hasty peace.
* It’s why we see a massive re-supply effort, to resupply and fix whatever was damaged there.
Just in time to put options back on the table after market close.
11/11
It is one of the only outcomes that can reconcile, the strange behavior we’ve seen.
Where Trump was willing to agree to almost anything, and has spent the entire week backtracking.
It was just a ploy for time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trump has ERODED the US' global footprint in a way that will likely shape the world for the next century:
-Ending US aide
-Failing to stand up for Ukraine
-Violating sovereignty in Venezuela
-Weak statements on Taiwan
-Folding on Iran
-Having China push Iran to the table
-Ending US development investment in Africa and Latin America
-Trade wars with South East Asia
-Pushing Canada and the EU into deeper trade relations with China
These have all rapidly diminished the US global sphere of influence, to the smallest its EVER been in the modern era.
2/10
The US spent a century building a sphere of influence that was broad and unchallenged.
It triumphed through cultural export that came on the backs of economic development and unwavering defense agreements.
America was a country you could trust, and it's help was of value.
4/10
Under that doctrine, the US had it's peak global influence around the 2000s, especially as this aligned with EU peak influence and the EU was an unwavering US ally against the China-Russia axis.
Some Pakistani sources close to the negotiations think the current Iran trips are part of plan to *TRICK* American negotiators into a bias peace deal.
Aimed at *appearing* to appease the US until AFTER the midterms, and then continuing a hardline agenda.
2/7
* Multiple sources have told me that Iran’s discussion of any potential concessions are oddly fixated on the first 8-12 months.
* One source said they’ve been told that’s because Iran believes after the mid-terms Trump will be a “lame duck” not authorized for aggression
3/7
* The trips to Oman and Russia seem to be focused on having allies implement short term programs, that “take 6-8 months to implement” and have the “appearance of concessions”
* For Oman this would mean a “joint responsibility” in the Strait in a “transition phase”
And 7 others had JPL connections via NASA/JPL, Los Almos or MIT partnerships…
3/3
One concern, just like with the CIA overseas deaths, was if Trump had sold off classified information of top credentialed scientists to foreign adversaries.
Because 11 JPL/NASA/Los Alamos top scientists had all died or disappeared under mysterious circumstances while working on alternative energy research.
This is a *VERY* weird overlap giving that story has been in the press the past few weeks.
My live fact check thread of the State of the Union, where I’ll fact check (and share any important announcements) until I crash out with rage…
God help me!
My soul feels like Kavanaugh’s face…
2/
Trump enters, starts his speech to cheers of “USA, USA, USA” from MAGA.
With a noticeably sparse Dem side of Congress.
He claims America is “back” and richer than ever - which isn’t true.
The economy is notably on a decline.
3/
Trump calls this America’s golden age.
And claims he has solved most of the problems he has inherited… which is weird because he still is blaming the jobs report and market decline on the “Biden economy”
Even if you had a top of the line studio camera for 2008, that much data would store 6000 HOURS of video, or tens of MILLIONS of photos.
Based on the cameras they seized, that much storage would be closer to 12,000 hours of video or 50M+ images.
3/5
12,000 hours is 3 years of 24/7....
Not only is there no way that the FBI has reviewed all of that footage, there is no world in which one man, who did a billion other things, produced all that by himself...
It seems almost impossible for that to all be CSAM...