Update in my fight to dismantle the broken OPT system—ICE just got me the numbers:
In Missouri alone there are 4,430 OPT visas—many working in jobs that are out-of-scope, stealing opportunities from young Missourians.
Here are some of the worst examples.🧵
OPT jobs *must* be directly related to the student’s major area of study.
And if you're a STEM major, you get *3-years of work authorization.*
Not only that, OPT holders are exempt from FICA taxes—a >15% tax subsidy for employers.
Given that, and considering foreigners utilizing OPT may be desperate for work, it should come as no surprise OPT is often abused.
I found cases of foreign students working at restaurants, bars, and janitorial services that likely have no connection to a student’s area of study.
Apparently necessary, degree-related, high skill employers include:
- A local Ethiopian restaurant, which filed for a STEM OPT employee last year (three-years long).
It's a highly reviewed restaurant but why does it need a recent grad STEM major? And why not hire American?
Another OPT employee works for a small janitorial services company. That doesn't seem like a natural fit.
OPT often undercuts White Collar work, but it's also undercutting Blue Collar workers by flooding the market with recent grads looking for any form of employment.
Not only that, but a cadre of shady consultants and woke NGOs are cashing in on OPT, teaching foreign students how to game the system.
And some are even using foreign student labor in-house to coach the importation of more foreign students and workers.
For example, Vitendo4Africa filed for an OPT and runs programs that:
- Offer classes on green card applications, refugee resettlement and US elections.
- Help employers to solicit newly arrived refugees.
Bottom line: OPT is not a student training program. It’s a backdoor jobs program for foreign nationals at the expense of Missouri families and American grads who are still struggling to find work.
USCIS, it’s time to shut this down. Missourians first. Americans first.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Did you know our Judiciary has its own taxpayer-funded “neutral training pipeline"?
Meet the USAID of Article III.
The Federal Judicial Center. What I've uncovered isn't "neutral" judicial training. It's ideological capture. Take a look at how it's infecting our judiciary. 🧵
The Federal Judicial Center (FJC) is the official research and education arm of the federal courts, created by Congress to train and equip our nation's judges.
It shapes how these judges evaluate evidence.
Its materials influence real court cases across the country every day.
You'd assume the FJC is filled with unbiased and impartial legal scholars, especially when it comes to directing judges' continuing education. Let's meet @jrlinkins, Director of Education at FJC.
The Trump DOJ recently won a massive case at the 8th Circuit.
For months, rogue district court judges in MN have engaged in all-out resistance.
ICE would arrest illegal aliens, but these judges would then immediately spring them loose.
The 8th Circuit just put an end to it.
A bit of background:
In 1996, Congress passed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA).
The bill passed with large bipartisan majorities.
President Clinton signed it.
(This was before Democrats adopted their radical open borders ideology.)
That law contains 8 USC 1225.
Because illegal aliens have never been legally admitted, § 1225 deems them "applicants for admission."
And it later mandates that any "applicant for admission...shall be detained" pending removal proceedings.
Live-tweeting now while listening in: Oral arguments in the landmark birthright citizenship case, Trump v. Barbara.
There is 1 hour scheduled for the argument, but I expect this argument to go somewhere around 2.5-3 hours, given how thorny and important of an issue this is. 🧵
Arguing today are Solicitor General John Sauer, who was my Solicitor General when I was Attorney General of Missouri. He has a very impressive win record at the Supreme Court and is representing the government.
And Cecilia Wang, the National Legal Director for the ACLU.
President Trump announced he is attending oral arguments today, which will be historic.
A little known fact pointed out by @AAGDhillon, the President has a "designated" seat inside the court room at the Supreme Court.
Today, the Supreme Court will hear the Birthright Citizenship case.
American citizenship is a sacred privilege, not an automatic gift to those who break our laws.
I've been fighting on this issue in the Senate and at the Supreme Court. Here's what I'll be listening for. 🧵
The case—Trump v. Barbara—presents SCOTUS with this question:
Whether President Trump's executive order interpreting the 14th Amendment and federal law to NOT require unlimited birthright citizenship for the children of illegal aliens and temporary visitors is legal.
The 14th Amendment contains the Citizenship Clause.
Ratified after the Civil War, it was intended to overturn SCOTUS's infamous Dred Scott decision, which held that people of African descent could never become US citizens, solely b/c of their race. In this case, SCOTUS will likely interpret the Citizenship Clause.