Within 10 days, parts of the global economy will start running short of critical goods
After 30 years studying economic sanctions and blockades, I don’t say this lightly:
--Not just higher prices
--Shortages.
Markets are not ready for this
Everyone is still talking about oil prices
That’s already outdated
--This is no longer a price shock
--It is the early stage of a system-wide supply shock
Here’s the mechanism:
price spike → physical shortage → economic contraction
We are now crossing into step 2
That’s when things break.
~20% of global oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz.
That flow is now constrained -- by Iran AND US
And it’s not just oil—it’s the base layer of modern production:
fuel, fertilizer, plastics, much more
Once inventories run down, this stops being about expensive inputs
It becomes about missing inputs
Factories don’t slow because costs rise
They stop because materials don’t arrive
We’ve seen the smaller version of this.
1973: ~7% supply disruption → shortages, rationing, industrial decline in under 90 days.
Today’s shock is larger.
The system is tighter -- We are at Day 45
The sequence from here is predictable:
Asia first → Europe next → global compression
Not collapse
Contraction
The U.S. won’t be spared
Energy independence doesn’t protect a globally integrated economy
When supply chains seize, the shock transmits via trade reductions
This is the real shift:
Prices no longer determine outcomes
Access does
And once that flips, governments start choosing winners and losers
Watch one thing this week:
Ships through Hormuz
--Not statements
--Not markets
If flows don’t recover, the system tightens further -- necessarily
By the time shortages show up in headlines, it’s already too late
That’s how these shocks work
Full breakdown—mechanism, timeline, what happens next: new analysis: Escalation Trap substack
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Taiwan is more vulnerable now than before the summit began -- and more than in decades
America’s power is declining since the Iran war — and world leaders are adjusting fast
-- Iran humiliated Trump’s envoys
-- Merz openly spoke of U.S. weakness
-- Now Xi pressing harder on Taiwan
US alliances are fragmenting and rivals are taking full advantage
For 30 years, the post–Cold War order rested on one assumption:
the United States could ultimately dominate escalation anywhere on earth
The Iran war shattered that belief
Not because Iran defeated America militarily.
Because it survived, gaines power, and exposed limits of US power the world has not seen since Vietnam.
The new bomb damage assessments are a geopolitical earthquake
Satellite imagery shows more damage to US bases in Gulf than Washington admitted
Leaked intelligence says Iran retains vast missile/ drone capabilities despite six weeks of bombing.
Marco Rubio’s 58-minute White House briefing on Iran was the most revealing statement yet from the Trump administration
Some will argue the briefing was overtaken by Trump’s later pause in Operation Freedom
That misses the point
Rubio revealed the strategic logic now driving the administration — and where escalation pressures could still lead
Here are the 5 most important signals
First: The mission is no longer being framed mainly around stopping an Iranian nuclear weapon
Rubio repeatedly described the conflict as defending the global economic order and preventing Iran from establishing a “new normal” in the Strait of Hormuz
That is a much larger objective
“We cannot live in a world where a country can decide, now we own the international shipping lane.”
Rubio repeatedly called current operations “defensive"
But he used that term to describe escalation:
• naval blockades
• sinking Iranian boats
• sanctions
• escort operations
• future retaliatory strikes
This matters because once escalation is rhetorically defined as “defense,” barriers to expansion weaken dramatically
“Two blockades, two clocks.”
That’s how Washington is framing the Iran war.
It’s wrong.
A century of evidence shows economic pressure alone almost never forces states to concede on core security issues.
Here’s what everyone is missing:
The famous claim: sanctions work ~33% of the time.
Reality (after controlling for military force):
<5% success rate
Most “wins” weren’t sanctions at all—they were backed by coups, invasions, or bombing
Sanctions don’t coerce -- They disguise force
More pain ≠ more concession
--Cuba: 60+ years, no regime change.
--Iraq: ~50% GDP collapse in the 1990s—no surrender.
--Russia (2022–): massive sanctions, no strategic reversal.
Why?
Because scarcity strengthens regime's control over what's left