Your smart TV is taking screenshots of your screen every 15 seconds.
Not a guess. Not a theory.
A peer-reviewed study by researchers at UC Davis, UCL, and UC3M tested it.
Samsung TVs: every minute.
LG TVs: every 15 seconds.
Even when you're just using it as a monitor.
Here's how to turn it off for every brand:
First, what's actually happening.
Your TV has a hidden feature called ACR- Automatic Content Recognition.
Think of it like Shazam, but for your screen.
It takes tiny snapshots of whatever you're watching. Sends a fingerprint to the company's servers. They match it to figure out exactly what's on your screen.
Every show. Every channel. Every game. Second by second.
This isn't speculation.
Researchers at UC Davis, University College London, and Universidad Carlos III de Madrid tested Samsung and LG TVs.
Published in the 2024 ACM Internet Measurement Conference.
They captured all the network traffic leaving these TVs.
Samsung sent data to its ACR servers every minute.
LG sent data every 15 seconds.
Paper: "Watching TV with the Second-Party: A First Look at Automatic Content Recognition Tracking in Smart TVs"
Here's the part that shocked the researchers.
ACR doesn't just track what you watch on the TV's own apps.
It tracks whatever is on screen. Your laptop. Your PlayStation. Your cable box. Anything plugged in through HDMI.
Direct quote from the paper:
"ACR network traffic exists when watching linear TV and when using smart TV as an external display using HDMI."
You thought your TV was just a screen. It's not.
ACR is turned ON by default during setup.
You probably agreed to it. Buried inside a wall of terms and conditions on day one.
Here's what Dr. Anna Maria Mandalari from UCL said:
"The average user is unlikely to know what ACR is or that they can opt out."
The opt-in takes one click. The opt-out takes 6.
Why do they do this?
Money.
TV companies don't just sell you a TV anymore. They sell your data.
Vizio's ad and data revenue hit $598 million in 2023. More than their hardware revenue. They make more money watching you than selling you the TV.
LG's ad business made nearly $700 million in 2024.
Source: Vizio's own earnings report. LG's official annual results.
Here's what they collect:
→ Every show you watch, second by second
→ Every channel you switch to
→ Every ad you see (and how long you watch it)
→ Your IP address
→ Your device ID
→ Nearby Wi-Fi networks
The FTC found that Vizio went further. They matched your IP address to data brokers. Added your age, gender, income, and marital status.
Then sold the full profile to advertisers.
Source: FTC complaint against Vizio, 2017.
The government got involved.
In 2017, the FTC fined Vizio $2.2 million for tracking 11 million TVs without consent. Vizio had installed the tracking software on TVs people already owned. Through a software update.
A separate class action settlement added $17 million.
In December 2025, the Texas Attorney General sued Samsung, LG, Sony, Hisense, and TCL for the exact same thing.
A court blocked Hisense from collecting ANY data within 48 hours.
Samsung settled in February 2026.
This affects almost everyone.
82% of US TV households own a smart TV. The average home has two.
Samsung alone has 73 million smart TVs in US homes. Confirmed in the Texas lawsuit.
If you own a TV made in the last 5 years, it's probably doing this right now.
Unless you've turned it off.
Here's how. Brand by brand.
1. Samsung — Turn off "Viewing Information Services"
Menu → Settings → All Settings → General & Privacy → Terms & Privacy
Uncheck "Viewing Information Services"
Samsung doesn't call it "tracking." They call it "Viewing Information Services."
That's intentional.
2. LG — Turn off "Live Plus"
Settings → General → System → Additional Settings
Toggle OFF "Live Plus"
Also go to:
Settings → Support → Privacy & Terms → User Agreements
Turn off "Viewing Information"
Warning: Multiple users report LG turns Live Plus back on after software updates. Check this setting every few months.
3. Roku TVs (TCL, Hisense, Philips, Insignia, Onn, Sharp, and others)
If your TV brand runs Roku software, this is your path.
4. Sony — Turn off "Samba Interactive TV"
Settings → All Settings → Samba Interactive TV → Toggle OFF
Sony uses a third-party company called Samba TV to run ACR.
Someone asked Sony in writing to confirm this stops all tracking. Sony refused to give a straight answer.
5. Vizio — Turn off "Viewing Data"
Menu → Settings → All Settings → Admin & Privacy → Viewing Data → Turn OFF
Vizio used to call this "Smart Interactivity." They renamed it. Same tracking. Different label.
The FTC forced them to ask for consent after 2017. But the setting still exists. Make sure it's off.
6. Amazon Fire TV (Fire Stick, Fire TV Cube, Insignia Fire TV, Toshiba Fire TV)
Settings → Preferences → Privacy Settings
Turn OFF all three:
→ Device Usage Data
→ Collect App and Over-the-Air Usage
→ Interest-Based Ads
Warning: These settings have been reported to turn themselves back on after Fire TV updates. Re-check after every update.
One thing every TV brand has in common:
Software updates can reset your privacy settings.
This has been reported on LG, Amazon Fire TV, and others.
One Sony user reported that Sony made agreeing to data collection a condition for getting a firmware update.
Every time your TV updates, go back and check. Takes 2 minutes.
The safest option?
Disconnect your TV from Wi-Fi entirely.
Use an Apple TV, Chromecast, or Roku stick for streaming instead. Run all your apps from the external device.
But here's the catch:
The NY Times found that some TVs save your data locally. Then upload it all the next time you reconnect.
So: disable ACR in settings AND disconnect from Wi-Fi. Both steps. Not just one.
That's 6 brands. 15 minutes. No apps to install.
82% of homes have a smart TV. Almost none of them have turned this off.
The FBI warned about this in 2019.
The FTC fined companies for this in 2017.
Texas sued 5 companies for this in 2025.
Researchers proved it in a peer-reviewed study in 2024.
None of this is hidden. It's just buried.
Now you know where to find it.
Bookmark this. Send it to someone who owns a TV.-
SOURCES
-Study: "Watching TV with the Second-Party: A First Look at Automatic Content Recognition Tracking in Smart TVs" — UC Davis, UCL, UC3M (ACM IMC 2024) arxiv.org/abs/2409.06203
30 seconds later it shows every time a US police officer has searched your car this year. The dates. The departments. Why they typed it in.
The site holds 219 million police searches on 4.6 million car plates. All pulled from public records.
Here is how to check your plate in 30 seconds 👇
What Flock actually does
Every time your car drives past a Flock camera, it takes a picture. Not just of your plate.
It also logs:
- Your car's make, model, and color
- Bumper stickers
- Roof racks
- Dents and scratches
- The exact time and GPS location
- Whether you were in a car or on a bike
All of it goes into a database that thousands of police officers can search.
Flock's numbers, confirmed by NBC News and the ACLU:
- Nearly 90,000 cameras across 49 states
- Over 5,000 police departments as customers
- More than 20 billion license plate scans every month
- 75% of departments feed data into a live national database
An officer in Florida can search your car in Massachusetts. No warrant needed.
A mother in Scottsdale, Arizona answered her phone in January 2023.
Her 15-year-old daughter Brianna was sobbing on the line. "Mom, I messed up."
Then a man took the phone. "Listen, I have your daughter. If you contact the police, I'll inject her with drugs and leave her in Mexico." He demanded $1 million.
Brianna was on a ski trip, completely safe. The US Senate later heard the case as an example of AI voice cloning fraud.
McAfee Labs found 3 seconds of audio produces an 85% voice match. Less than one TikTok clip.
Here's the one-word system every family needs tonight 👇
This is called virtual kidnapping. No one is actually taken. The scammer just needs a few seconds of your kid's voice.
Microsoft's own research showed a 3-second audio sample is enough to clone anyone's voice with near-perfect accuracy. The tech is called VALL-E.
Sources: Microsoft Research (2023), McAfee Labs "Artificial Imposter" report (May 2023).
Scammers do not need to hack you. They pull audio from:
Every time your bank, Gmail, or WhatsApp sends a code to that number, they get it. Not you.
Princeton tested 259 recycled US numbers. 171 could still log into someone's old accounts.
Here's how to fix it in 10 minutes 👇
There are only so many 10-digit phone numbers in the US. About 35 million numbers get disconnected every year in the US alone.
To keep the system from running out, the FCC requires carriers to recycle numbers after a minimum 45-day aging period.
In India, TRAI's rule is 90 days of inactivity before deactivation.
That number you stopped using 2 years ago? Someone else has had it for almost 2 years.
In 2021, Kevin Lee and Arvind Narayanan from Princeton ran a controlled study.
They sampled 259 recycled numbers from Verizon and T-Mobile.
What they found:
- 171 numbers (66%) had linked accounts at Amazon, PayPal, Yahoo, or AOL
- 100 numbers (39%) were linked to email addresses caught in known password breaches
- 139 numbers (54%) were tied to active Google, Yahoo, or AOL accounts
They could have logged into other people's accounts. They didn't. They published the paper.
Yet most people use 10% of what it can actually do.
These 10 hidden features will save you hours every week:
1) Lock Any Chat
You can hide and lock specific chats so nobody can see them, even if your phone is unlocked.
Perfect for personal messages, work secrets, or private photos.
How to do it:
• Tap and hold the chat you want to lock
• Tap the lock icon at the top
• Confirm with Face ID, fingerprint, or passcode
• The chat moves to a "Locked Chats" folder
2) Secret Code (Double Lock)
You can hide the entire Locked Chats folder behind a secret code only you know.
To unlock, you type the code into the search bar and the folder appears.
How to do it:
• Go to Locked Chats folder
• Tap Settings (three dots)
• Tap "Secret Code"
• Create a code (letters, numbers, even emojis)
• Turn on "Hide Locked Chats"
Researchers at Mila and McGill University asked one question. Does AI give the same medical advice to every patient? They tested 42,000 responses across 7 ethnic groups.
The answer is no. Not even close.
84 patient profiles. 3 sex categories. 5 medical categories. Same symptoms. Same conditions. Same questions. Different identities attached to each one.
Here is what they found.
White and Asian patients received the simplest, clearest medical advice. Short sentences. Lower reading difficulty. Higher readability scores across every medical category tested.
Indigenous patients received the most complex advice. Longer. Harder to read. Higher grade level. Consistently. Across every category. American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian patients were always at the bottom of the readability scale.
Black patients were right behind them.
In mental health, where understanding your advice can be the difference between getting help and giving up, the gap was the worst. Indigenous patients received mental health advice with a Flesch reading ease score of negative 8.7. That means the text is harder to read than a medical research paper. The same mental health advice for white patients was significantly more readable.
Then the researchers tested intersectional identities. The disparities doubled.
When race and sex were combined, the gaps between the best-treated and worst-treated groups were twice as large as when race alone was measured. Intersex Indigenous patients received the most complex, least readable medical advice of any group in the study.
The AI did not give them wrong advice. It gave them advice they are less likely to understand. In healthcare, that distinction disappears fast. If you cannot understand your treatment plan, you cannot follow it. If you cannot follow it, the outcome changes.
Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander patients received one additional disparity. The AI assessed their conditions as less medically urgent than the same conditions presented by white or Asian patients. Lower urgency means slower response. In medicine, slower response means worse outcomes.
The AI was not instructed to treat anyone differently. It was given the same question with a different name attached. The name changed the answer.
A separate study published in Nature Medicine tested 9 major AI models and found the same pattern. AI systems proposed inferior treatments when the patient's race was mentioned. The bias was present in every model tested.
Millions of people now ask AI chatbots for medical advice every day. The advice they receive depends, in part, on who the AI thinks they are.
1/The readability gap by race.
White and Asian patients received the most readable medical advice across every category tested. Indigenous patients received the least readable. Every time.
The bottom 3 groups: American Indian/Alaska Native. Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Black.
The top 3 groups: White. Asian. Hispanic.
The pattern never broke. Not in skin conditions. Not in respiratory. Not in cardiac. Not in mental health. Not in general medicine.
2/ Mental health is where it gets worst.
Indigenous patients received mental health advice with a Flesch reading ease of negative 8.7. That is below zero. That means the text is harder to read than a graduate-level academic paper.
White patients received significantly more readable mental health advice.
When understanding your advice is the difference between getting help and giving up, the AI made it hardest to understand for the people who may need it most.