Greg Clark Profile picture
Apr 16 15 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Each time Alberta has established an Electoral Boundaries Commission to redraw election maps the government has accepted the commission’s majority report, so I was surprised and disappointed to learn that a committee of MLAs has instead been tasked with creating a new map. /1
As a member of Alberta’s Electoral Boundaries Commission, I wanted to share some background on why we give independent commissions the job of creating election maps and also provide some details on what’s in the majority report. /2
In Canada, we don’t want elected officials drawing their own election maps. Instead, governments give independent commissions the job of drawing maps that reflect population trends while also respecting the challenges of representing diverse, rural and remote communities. /3
The Canadian model isn’t one-person-one-vote, it’s what we call “effective representation.” /4
Commissions are non-partisan. We travelled to every corner of the province gathering input from Albertans of all political stripes, holding nearly 50 public hearings in 16 locations across the province. Including written submissions, we heard from over 2,000 people. /5
In the end, the majority of the commission (two members appointed by the opposition and the judge appointed by the government) created recommended maps. /6
Our majority report balances the dramatic shift in population to urban Alberta while respecting the genuine difficulty of representing sparsely populated areas far from the Legislature. /7
It was a fair process that created a balanced electoral map delivering effective representation to all Albertans. /8
The majority’s view on number of seats in the Legislature was clear; we suggested future commissions be given the power to set the number of seats in the Legislature (like they do in BC), and if so “…we may very well have proposed a map of at least 91 electoral divisions.” /9
Or, we may not have. We would have drawn a map of 91 (or any other number) the same way we drew the map of 89; we would start with a blank map and independently consider how we could provide effective representation for all Albertans. /10
What we can’t do is simply drop two new seats onto an existing map. The commission goes where the data takes us, and context matters when we're creating a map based on effective representation for all. /11
It’s also important to know that the recommendation that a committee of MLAs implement a map of 91 seats came from only one member of the five-member commission. /12
I will end with what I think are the most important words in the 362-page Electoral Boundaries Report: /13
“…the Legislative Assembly should carefully consider the majority of this Commission’s independent, justified, and reasonable recommendations before adopting any alternative boundaries...the majority recommends the adoption of the majority report in its totality.” /14
Thanks for reading this far...you can read the full report here: elections.ab.ca/uploads/abebc_…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Clark

Greg Clark Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GregClarkAB

Feb 14, 2019
Since Tuesday’s meeting where the @albertaNDP and @Alberta_UCP voted together to cut funding for smaller parties in #ableg, I've run a few scenarios. Now that we know the final formula, it's actually worse that I thought. Here's some background on this: edmontonjournal.com/news/politics/… /1
Under the NDP/UCP plan, as majorities get bigger, proportionately less money goes to small opposition parties, even if they reach the new magic number of four MLAs for official party status #ableg /2
This could be a mistake that comes from not paying attention to the details, but given the subcommittee tasked with coming up with a new formula has been working on this for more than *two years* it sure looks like a deliberate attempt to disadvantage smaller parties #ableg /3
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(