Opposition infographics are great for outrage, terrible for legal reality. Here’s what’s actually true about Xavier Becerra’s record:
• The Chevron Claim: While he took campaign funds from a major CA employer, his actions speak louder: Becerra has a long record of suing oil companies for regulatory violations. And he filed over 100 lawsuits against the Trump administration to protect the environment.
• The Exxon Case: He didn’t “block” a lawsuit, he prioritized winning cases. His office focused on immediate environmental enforcement and defending California’s cap-and-trade system while building the legal groundwork his successor later used.
🧵
• Police Records: This was a legal dispute over retroactivity. Becerra didn’t hide records, he waited for a court to confirm the law applied to past cases. Once the court ruled, the files were released. He followed the process to avoid exposing the state to lawsuits.
• Gun Research Data: He didn’t block data for fun, he was protecting privacy. He cited state laws protecting the personal info of gun owners and pushed for legislation to make sharing that data legally safe.
2/5
• Healthcare (CalCare): Becerra is one of the nation’s leading defenders of the ACA and has been clear he supports moving toward single-payer. His approach is universal coverage first, expanding Medi-Cal and lowering costs now, while building a stable path to CalCare. That’s not opposition, that’s sequencing with a plan.
• Abolishing ICE: He supports reform, not slogans. He’s been a strong defender of DACA and immigrant rights, but understands immigration enforcement is federal. A governor can fight abuses and push oversight, not just “abolish” an agency with a hashtag.
3/5
• Billionaire Tax: I didn’t find a credible source showing he directly opposes it. His hesitation is about fiscal stability, California’s budget is already volatile. He favors sustainable funding over proposals that could get tied up in court.
• Foreign Policy: As a former Cabinet member, his stance reflects standard U.S. diplomacy. He’s called for humanitarian aid and a two-state solution, choosing measured language over activist framing.
4/5
Bottom line: Xavier Becerra governs like an Attorney General and a Cabinet Secretary. He follows the law, protects the state, and prioritizes results over rhetoric. He’s ready on day one.
One last point: that infographic is far-left spin, a classic ideological purity test that ignores how governing actually works. It frames respect for the rule of law as weakness. I’m a progressive, and I don’t buy it. You shouldn’t either. I look at candidates holistically.
-end-
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let me be clear. I don’t support AIPAC. Quite the opposite. But I also have major issues with Track AIPAC. It’s a shady project.
Track AIPAC isn’t a neutral watchdog.
It’s a political operation with its own PAC and a very clear agenda.
If AIPAC is your red line, fine. Draw it. But at least make sure the numbers you’re using are real.
🧵
Track AIPAC drops bold red info memes that mix real donations with outside spending and vague “donor network”, and social media run wild.
Too many are falling for it and doing their dirty work for them.
When you check Track AIPAC’s math, a pattern appears. Their biggest claims aren’t verifiable. And they’re not interested in showing their receipts.
The biggest totals are often only partially auditable. Without donor-by-donor disclosure and a clear rulebook, outside observers cannot fully replicate the math. There is no transparency.
2/7
Track AIPAC likes to market itself as a neutral watchdog brand, a digital transparency project shining light on campaign finance.
But follow the filings and the structure is clear. They have their own fundraising PAC, Citizens Against AIPAC Corruption.
The treasurer of that PAC, Casey Kennedy, is also the co-founder of Track AIPAC.
3/7
“Donald J. Trump had raped her along with Jeffrey Epstein.” ███████ noted some girl with a funny name “took me into a fancy hotel or building, that’s how it happened.”
Also this: she was advised to call the police. But she replied, “I can’t, they will kill me.”
She did contact the police and was later found with her head “blown off”. Officers on the scene stated there was no way it was a suicide. The coroner ruled it as suicide anyway.
This is crazy. I keep trying to include in the thread the searchable Epstein library database link as a source, and it won’t let me. It keeps failing to post.
When I heard someone say Epstein trafficked more than a thousand women and girls, it stopped me cold. Then I remembered this and it clicked: it all ties back to white supremacy.
Epstein was obsessed with genetic engineering, eugenics, and “improving” humanity, including his own DNA. It’s documented.
And the pattern is familiar: the same old racist fantasies about the superior race.
🧵
I said it’s familiar for a reason. Not just about history and Aryan nation fantasies. Elon Musk and Marc Andreessen aren’t worried about birth rates in general. They’re worried about birth rates of white babies.
Musk keeps warning about “population collapse” while bragging about having kids with multiple women and selling it like a public service. He knows exactly what he is doing.
When powerful men turn their own reproduction into a mission to “save humanity,” that is not quirky. It is the same old eugenics playbook dressed up in tech futurism.
Polls show that Project 2025 didn’t resonate, that voters thought it wasn’t real. Well, now we’re living it and it’s already 47% complete after only 9 months.
Trump’s shutdown is a shortcut: gut the federal workforce, fire career experts, and replace them with loyalists. Laid out in P2025.
🧵
This is chilling:
“The goal is to unravel enough of the federal government now. That it will make it impossible for Democrats to rebuild it even when they do get back to the White House.”
2/3
📌 Project 2025, Chapter 1 (“Executive Office,” pp. 75–77):
“The incoming Trump Administration must reinstate Schedule F … allowing the removal of policy-related careerists who resist the agenda and their replacement with personnel committed to implementing the president’s directives.”
📌 And it gets clearer:
“Civil service protections have entrenched unelected bureaucrats who thwart presidential priorities. By reclassifying these positions under Schedule F, the executive can dismiss non-compliant employees and install loyalists.”
🧵
Something folks are missing here: this raid wasn’t about “illegals taking American jobs.” It was about ICE storming the Hyundai–LG battery plant in Georgia, part of a $7.6B Metaplant project that isn’t even operational yet.
They dragged out more than 300 South Korean engineers and specialists. People flown in to help stand the place up so it could eventually employ thousands of Georgians/Americans.
This plant wasn’t scheduled to start running until late 2025 or early 2026. These workers weren’t taking jobs; they were building the factory that would create them.
Reports suggest this wasn’t about “undocumented” workers. At worst, it was visa infractions—the wrong paperwork, the wrong classification. Instead of sorting it out, we humiliated our allies and hauled their workers off in shackles.
South Korea is one of America’s most important partners. And in an election stunt, we just told them their people are expendable. Farmers already learned this lesson in Alabama when crops rotted in the fields. Now Georgia might learn it the hard way with batteries.
The questions we should be asking: will this plant ever get up and running on time—or did politics just kneecap one of the biggest clean energy projects in the country? And is the damage done to our relationship with South Korea long-term?
2/3
Now let’s chat about the “informant” and her ill-thought-out plan. Tori Branum, a Republican running in Georgia’s 12th, bragged about pushing the ICE raid on Hyundai’s construction site.
It was a political stunt. But she didn’t think it through. The raid stalled a battery plant that isn’t even scheduled to open until 2026—a plant that would have employed Georgians in good-paying jobs. She screwed her own voters.
Most of the South Korean workers weren’t “taking jobs.” They were specialists brought in to get the plant operational. Their expertise was the bridge to thousands of American jobs down the line.
3/3
NMSOP isn’t a dark money group. It’s the one group in New Mexico telling the truth about corporate healthcare.
They filed every required disclosure. They operate in the open. And they exist to protect you—not hospital execs, not insurers, not private equity.
So why is Think New Mexico attacking them?
Because this is about power, not principle. And Think New Mexico is siding with the people who already have too much of it.
🧵
2/ Think New Mexico wants you to trust them. Private equity already does.
They’re helping corporate hospitals rewrite New Mexico law to protect profits, not patients.
They call themselves a “nonpartisan” think tank. But follow the money and you’ll see the scam.
3/ Start here:
Private equity is swallowing up healthcare.
• $115 billion in buyouts last year
• 1 in 5 U.S. patients now treated in investor-owned facilities
• States are scrambling to keep care affordable and safe
New Mexico is the test kitchen.
43% of community hospitals there are already investor-owned.