π§΅ THREAD: The true reason Pete Hegseth is being targeted is because he's standing between President Trump and a coup
@PeteHegseth named the institutions... CFR, Brookings, the general class... in 37 seconds in a video by @Liz_Wheeler . Within 72 hours of his nomination, a color revolution planning document cited him as an insider threat.
They didn't go after him because of drinking. They didn't go after him because of women. They went after him because every color revolution manual ever written says the same thing: you cannot topple a government unless the security forces defect. And a loyal Secretary of Defense is the one person who makes sure they don't.
I have the receipts. Their own documents. Their own training sessions. Their own words on camera.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. π
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler This is not my theory. This is theirs.
Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan β the two most cited scholars in the color revolution field β studied 323 regime change campaigns. Their finding:
Security force defections make campaigns FORTY-SIX TIMES more likely to succeed.
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler So what did co-author Maria Stephan do next?
She became Chief Organizer of the Horizons Project. And on July 16, 2025, she trained New Kings participants on video.
"Security forces refused to obey orders to repress protesters."
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler 130,000 people are told:
"When they crack and power within them shifts, the entire edifice can crumble."
"They" = security forces... our military.
Yes, Stefan's teachings are now informing a mass American audience that it's how you bring down a government.
It gets worse. Hardy Merriman β Gene Sharp's personal assistant, co-author of the CANVAS regime change field manual used in 50+ countries β wrote a domestic version.
It says:
"Those who serve in government institutions swear an oath to uphold the Constitution. They don't swear allegiance to the president himself."
Then it teaches them how to defect: call in sick, work slowly, ignore orders, leak to media, publicly defy.
Now look at what their own planning document says about Hegseth.
The "Democracy Playbook 2025" β the same document that teaches "dealing with security forces" and color revolution case studies β cites this in footnote 49:
"Pete Hegseth had been flagged by fellow service member as possible 'Insider Threat'" β AP, November 15, 2024.
72 hours after his nomination. In a regime change manual.
Then the operation went live.
November 11, 2025: The National Lawyers Guild Military Law Task Force publishes "FAQ on Refusing Illegal Orders."
November 12: Same group publishes a statement calling U.S. Venezuela operations "war crimes" and declaring officers "should refuse superior orders."
Remember these dates.
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Six days later. November 18.
Six Democratic members of Congress β all military veterans β release a video telling active-duty troops:
"You MUST refuse illegal orders."
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Five of the six were recruited through a single organization: New Politics Leadership Academy.
One pipeline. One talent program. Five of six. Mark Kelly was the sixth.
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler The administration took the bait. Exactly as the playbook predicted.
Trump called them "traitors" and threatened death. Hegseth opened a Pentagon investigation. Grand jury convened under 18 USC 2387... sedition. It failed.
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Daniel Driscoll β Secretary of the Army β has been MORE disruptive than Hegseth. Cancelled the M10 Booker. Halted Humvee production.
His confirmation vote... 66-28 versus Hegseth's 51-50. Zero organized opposition for Driscoll. Why?
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Because Driscoll is someone the system can work with. He's Yale Law with cross-partisan relationships.
Like this one: Daniel Driscoll's wife donated over six thousand dollars to Maggie Goodlander, one of the Seditious Six.
The color revolution playbook has one tool for security forces: social pressure through professional networks to induce defection.
Driscoll is embedded in those networks. He can be pulled away.
Hegseth isn't. He was never attached. The system can't co-opt him... so its only option is removal.
That's why Driscoll gets 16 Democratic votes and puff pieces. That's why Hegseth gets grand juries.
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler Yes, Braver Angels is tied. IMIP hosted a "Pre-Huddle for Braver Angels Convention" on June 13, 2024.
Tabatha Pilgrim Thompson, from the Horizons Project, Maria Stephan's organization, was on the call. Watch below:
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler And MWEG? Same table.
Jennifer Thomas if MWEG on the IMIP call, February 2024:
"We couldn't have done it without people like you."
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler IMIP's Sterling Speirn responds: "If you have a Mormon Women's chapter in your community, you're going to have a little passing gear already in place."
MWEG is the grassroots arm. IMIP is the coordination layer. And Maria Stephan's Horizons Project is a part of this same series.
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler When Hegseth took his seat on the USIP board, the institutional home where the color revolution playbook was developed, the acting president physically barricaded the building.
They sent DOGE staff, FBI agents, and DC police to get in.
CONCLUSION:
Pete Hegseth named the institutions in 37 seconds. The institutions responded with:
- Pre-positioned oppo research activated in 72 hours
- A regime change planning document citing him by name
- A legal predicate for military disobedience published the same week as the Seditious Six video
- A pipeline that produced the cohort
- A grand jury they couldn't win
- A replacement they CAN co-opt
- Braver Angels and MWEG sitting at the same table as the color revolution coordinators
- A physical barricade at the building where the playbook was written
They're not trying to get rid of a bad SecDef. They're trying to remove the one obstacle that makes their entire methodology fail.
If you appreciated this content, you will love my upcoming book - October 2026. I know it's a long way off, but we intentionally went with a small publisher to skirt censorship issues and need every preorder to launch in big chains.
Last night, Darializa Avila Chevalier β endorsed by NYC-DSA (Democratic Socialists of America) β beat a five-term incumbent to win New York's 13th congressional district.
@AsraNomani has been reporting on their ties to Cuba and the China/Singham network. But whatβs not known is DSAβs deep ties to the German government.
The Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung (RLS) is the political foundation of Die Linke β the German parliamentary party formed from the merger of the Party of Democratic Socialism, itself the legal successor to East Germany's ruling Marxist party, the SED.
Under German law, every party in the Bundestag gets a taxpayer-funded foundation. Die Linke's share is approximately EUR70MM annually.
Most German party foundations sponsor conferences, publish research, and fund exchange programs. What RLS-NYC did was put its own staff inside DSA's organizational leadership β concurrently β for over a decade.
In 2012, RLS opened a New York office. EIN 45-3658022. Their own annual report states: "With the help of funds from the BMZ and the Foreign Office, the Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung maintains a network of international relationships. This includes financing its foreign offices."
Over the last 13 years, Berlin has sent millions to this office.
Despite these ties, no FARA registration for the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung was identified in the Department of Justice database.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread.π
Neal Meyer is listed on the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation's payroll as "Project Manager."
Meyer previously served as NYC-DSA's chapter treasurer from 2016 to 2018.
On January 15, Meyer published "Big Stakes in the Big Apple" on , a strategic analysis of DSA's electoral prospects after Mamdani's mayoral victory.
One week later, NYC-DSA voted endorse Darializa Avila Chevalier for NY-13. rosalux.nyc
π¨π§΅ BREAKING - The "conservative" protest against AI data centers has an anti-ICE NGO organizer, a DSA member, Facebook money.
Other than that, totally grassroots.
Axios ran an "exclusive" Wednesday about a "conservative group" called Humans First planning a nationwide day of protest against AI data centers on July 18. Amy Kremer is chairing it and invoking the Tea Party.
Axios didn't mention that Humans First was incubated by the Center for AI Safety, an organization funded with millions from Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz. Or that its original staff included a Sunrise Movement organizer who sat in at Pelosi's office with AOC and a DSA member who organized for Kamala Harris.
NBC News described CAIS as having founded Humans First "to be a sort of Trojan horse to make AI safety issues more palatable to a conservative political audience."
@ParkerThayer exposed the Action Network backend.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. π
Credit to @ParkerThayer for finding this Action Network backend and inspiring me to dig a bit deeper.
π¨ THREAD: What do Mike Pence, Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, and Elaine Chao have in common? They were all paid by a Marxist-Islamist Iran group that was designated as terrorist until 2012.
No, this is not a joke.
Mojahedin-e-Khalq (MEK) was founded by leftist Islamists to oppose the western-backed Pahlavi, and participated in his 1979 overthrow. Khomeini barred MEK afterwards. MEK was implicated in multiple bombings, including that of Americans, and remained an openly armed group until 2003.
Since they got de-listed as a terrorist organization in 2012 on procedural grounds, MEK and their fronts have been actively recruiting US politicians selling themselves as a moderate alternative to Khomeini. But RAND Corporation says MEK meets the qualifications for a cult, citing criteria such as forcing their members to work 16+ hour days and forced divorces.
Polls of the Iranian-American community shows that they do NOT accept Rajavi, MeK's leader, as legitimate, with a 46-point net disapproval - numbers nearly as bad as the existing regime.
As Pence's former Chief of Staff, Marc Short, has already weighed against Trump deal, it's helpful to recall this.
Receipts below. As always, patience as I pull the thread together.π
In an interview with @ItsYourGov , National Council of Resistance of Iran director and MeK representative Alireza Jafarzadeh was asked directly: "Is your group involved in any sort of lobbying or payments for speeches to prominent individuals such as Mike Pompeo?"
NCRI-US said "absolutely not."
@ItsYourGov Jafarzadeh is the registrant contact on FARA Registration #6171 for NCRI-US for Iran, on behalf of MeK.
π§΅ THREAD: Shashank Joshi, a foreign think tank careerist, has a 16-year record of attacking US foreign policy... and now he's lecturing our military leadership on how to take the oath. Why does he still have a work visa?
He's an Indian national who arrived in April and is already the loudest critic of the Pentagon on social media.
The Economist's new Washington Bureau Chief β an Indian national on a visa who just arrived in April β went on a Canadian national security podcast literally titled "The Problem of America" and said this about US military operations:
"They have attacked scores of small boats in the Pacific and the Caribbean. They've killed dozens of people in a campaign that is, by most accounts, quite illegal and contrary to international law."
That's Shashank Joshi, @shashj . Defence editor turned bureau chief. Two months in the country and he's already built a 16-year paper trail calling American power "malevolent," "predatory," and "quite illegal" β while sitting on the advisory board of a UK think tank funded by the European Commission, BAE Systems, and the US State Department.
And he's now lecturing our military leadership on what it means to take the oath.
I have the receipts.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. π
Shashank Joshi has been in DC for two months, and is already lecturing our military officials on what their oaths mean⦠even though his entire record is criticizing the US military.
He's an Indian national. Cambridge. Enrolled in a Harvard PhD program... but his public profiles list no doctorate, suggesting he dropped out. Senior Research Fellow at RUSI, the world's oldest defence think tank. Then a stint at the Tony Blair Institute. The Economist hired him as Defence Editor in 2018. Promoted to Washington Bureau Chief, April 2026.
Everyone has their opinion on the Iran war or Israel. Maybe that opinion is enough to deter them from supporting Trump. I may not agree with it, but I understand where it comes from and it's a free country.
But when that turns into allying with Communists - that's when I have to speak up.
Institutional left-wing populism IS Communism. I'm not using it as a slur as in everyone to the left is a Communist. I mean it literally.
I'm talking about PSL, CODEPINK, Singham groups. The movements on the left that are anti-globalist are overwhelmingly Marxist.
π¨π§΅ BREAKING: Former DHS Chief Miles Taylor's prank site collected death threats against the President and 4,000+ people's personal data. Then exposed them through all an open API. π¨
Two days ago, I showed you how Miles Taylor's GTFO ICE site exposed 17,000+ people's data on an open API. That site halted sign-ups and is still "under construction."
But Taylor's organization DEFIANCE[.]org didn't just build one leaky site. They built two. On the same server.
UndoTrump[.]org β launched April 1, 2026 as an "April Fools' joke" β collects names, emails, and political messages from people signing up for fictional "Removal Parties" at government buildings. The White House Ballroom. The Kennedy Center. The DOJ. Battleships.
4,000+ signup records. 3,300+ unique people. Same vulnerability. Same API. Same zero authentication.
And this one has death threats against a sitting President in the database.
The man who was deputy chief of staff for the department that houses the Secret Service couldn't secure a sign-up form. Again.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. π
Here's a video of Miles himself soliciting PII in sign-ups. He implies he's not saving the user data... but he did.
Same server. Same IP address. 34.111.179.208. Google Cloud Platform. Same React 19 frontend. Same Express.js backend. Same registrar. Domains registered 13 days apart.
This wasn't two mistakes. This was one codebase deployed twice. Name.com