New OPT data from California was provided to my office.đź§µ
Remember, OPT lets foreign students work in jobs directly related to their college major.
STEM gets UP TO 3 YEARS. Employers skip taxes—a 15%+ subsidy.
Cheap foreign labor on steroids, while Americans bear the cost of their own replacement.
This is a jobs heist. While American grads scramble, foreigners flood in.
Big Tech and Silicon Valley are gobbling them up like candy. Thousands and thousands of OPTs.
They fire American workers, then request more foreign workers to cut costs.
But it gets worse.
O2F, Inc. —headquartered in India— has 314 OPTs in California. They brag about their “team of 400.”
Do the math: over 75% foreign students on OPT. An INDIAN company staffing up on AMERICAN college visas. You cannot make this up.
Then there’s “Sayaam For All”
706 OPTs in CA.
A nonprofit dedicated to “volunteer matching across India”, and is supposedly 100% remote/volunteer.
Tax-free, cheap foreign labor + OPT status for students.
California’s woke NGO racket is in full swing too, piling on the OPTs:
• Women of Color on the Move
• Justice & Diversity Center of San Francisco
• International Action Network for Gender Equity
• And innumerable 2SLGBTQIA+ NGOs
All DEI grifts tax-subsidized by OPT workers.
And don’t forget the “college to coffee shop” pipeline:
Gold’s Gym
H Mart
Various Indian restaurants
This has ZERO to do with their “major area of study.”
It’s blatant abuse, plain and simple.
Bottom line: OPT/CPT isn’t practical training, it’s a backdoor jobs program for Big Tech, foreign companies, woke NGOs, and refugee mills at the direct expense of American graduates and workers.
Taxpayer-subsidized replacement. Shut it down. End OPT. Put Americans first.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Trump Administration just declared the EEOC’s disparate-impact regime unconstitutional.
Disparate impact forced employers to trade neutral standards for racial quotas.
This is a direct strike on one of the Left’s favorite tools for forcing racial outcomes through law.
For decades, disparate impact let our managerial elite treat neutral standards as suspect if they produced the “wrong” racial numbers.
It banned things like background checks, aptitude tests, knowledge exams, hiring screens, and merit-based selection.
That regime is over.
OLC’s conclusion is clear: EEOC’s Title VII guidelines are unconstitutional because they impose liability based on disparate outcomes alone and pressure employers into race-based decision making.
According to the Public Interest Legal Foundation, its client is challenging the Illinois Voting Rights Act of 2011’s redistricting mandates under the Fifteenth Amendment and federal Voting Rights Act.
That is exactly the kind of litigation Callais invites.
Illinois did not hide the ball.
When Gov. Pritzker signed the maps, he invoked the Illinois Voting Rights Act and praised redistricting plans designed to preserve “clusters of minority voters” with “collective electoral power.”
Virginia's map just got struck down. Is California next?
California's "mapmaker" drew its new maps to "ensure" that racially gerrymandered "VRA seats are bolstered in order to make them most effective." That's illegal under Callais.
@AAGDhillon: Here's how we can do it. đź§µ
California state law requires an "independent" Commission to draw its district maps.
But Newsom and state Legislature Dems overrode the Commission last year to gerrymander.
That meant hiring a "mapmaker"—Paul Mitchell—to do it.
But he drew an illegal racial gerrymander.
Before SCOTUS's recent Callais decision, courts interpreted the VRA to effectively *require* racial quotas in gerrymandering.
As Justice Thomas explained, that was “repugnant to any nation that strives for the ideal of a color-blind Constitution.”
Today—as Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution—I urged @DAGToddBlanche and @AAGDhillon to act on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais.
DOJ has the power to enforce this decision nationwide and must use it to end illegal racially-gerrymandered districts.
My Subcommittee has oversight responsibility for constitutional rights, civil-rights enforcement, and DOJ's Civil Rights Division.
We are going to use it.
It's time to enforce our laws and our color-blind Constitution. We must undo prior race-based actions.
The Supreme Court has now made clear: "Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act . . . was designed to enforce the Constitution—not collide with it."
That means DOJ cannot keep treating Section 2 as a license to force States to sort Americans into districts by race.