Third largest producer in the cartel. Walking out in the middle of a Middle East war.
This isn’t an oil price story. It’s a regime change story.
🧵
OPEC was founded in 1960. The UAE joined in 1967.
Qatar left in 2019. Indonesia suspended membership in 2016. Angola left in 2023.
But UAE is different. It’s the third largest producer behind Saudi and Iraq. Capacity above 4 million barrels a day. ADNOC targeting 5 million by 2027.
You don’t replace that with a press release.
The official reason: “national interest” and “production flexibility.”
The real reason has two parts.
One. UAE is held to a 3 mbpd quota while sitting on 4+ mbpd of capacity. It has wanted to pump more for years. Saudi Arabia said no.
Two. UAE asked Gulf partners to back it militarily during Iranian attacks. The response was weak. Anwar Gargash said so publicly on Monday.
The cartel discipline broke before the announcement did.
Why this matters for prices in the short run.
Less than the headline suggests.
EIA estimates Gulf producers have shut in 9.1 million barrels a day in April because of the Hormuz crisis. UAE can leave OPEC, but it cannot ship what it cannot move through the Strait.
Brent at $113. WTI broke $100 for the first time since April 10. The move is real but it is reacting to ceasefire risk, not UAE supply.
Why this matters in the long run. This is the actual story.
OPEC’s leverage was always coordination. Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, Iraq, Iran moving in the same direction. That coordination is now visibly broken.
Saudi Arabia loses its biggest production partner.
The political cover of a unified Gulf bloc is gone.
Trump gets a public win on his “OPEC is ripping off the world” line.
Russia’s OPEC+ partnership weakens further.
Three of the last four years of OPEC+ cuts were possible because UAE held the line despite wanting to pump more. That constraint is gone.
The signal to watch is not what UAE does next. It is what Saudi Arabia does next.
Two paths.
Path A. Saudi cuts production hard to defend prices. Loses market share to UAE. Internal pressure on MBS rises because fiscal breakeven is around $90.
Path B. Saudi floods the market to punish UAE and reset discipline through pain. Prices crash once Hormuz reopens. Every high-cost producer globally takes the hit.
Neither path is good for the cartel.
What this means for India.
Short term. Nothing changes. Hormuz is the binding constraint, not OPEC quotas. Brent at $113 is the immediate problem. Rupee under pressure. OMC margins squeezed. LPG and fuel inflation already in the system.
Medium term. If UAE pumps to capacity once Hormuz reopens, the supply picture flips. India is the world’s third largest crude importer. A fragmented OPEC with one major producer pumping freely is structurally bullish for Indian consumers.
But that requires Hormuz to reopen. And that requires the war to end.
What I am watching from here.
Saudi response in the next 7 days. Statement, production guidance, anything.
Russia response. Putin met Iran’s foreign minister Monday. OPEC+ without UAE is a different animal.
Iran position. UAE leaving while Iran is the reason for the energy shock is its own message.
Other GCC members. If Kuwait or Bahrain follow, OPEC is structurally finished.
ADNOC production guidance. The number that matters.
For 60 years OPEC has been the most successful commodity cartel in history. It survived the 1973 embargo, the 1986 collapse, the 2014 shale shock, and a global pandemic.
It may not survive a war it had no part in starting.
Watch the facts, not the statements.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The most powerful banker in America just said something at a polite Norwegian conference that most CEOs will not say out loud.
“There will be some kind of bond crisis.”
Jamie Dimon is not given to drama. That makes the sentence heavier, not lighter.
A thread on what he said, and what it means for India 🧵
Dimon named the ingredients.
Geopolitics. Oil. Government deficits.
His point was not that any single one of them breaks the market. His point is they are all stacking at the same time, and we do not get to choose which combination becomes the trigger.
“They may go away, but they may not.”
The precedent he reached for is recent.
UK gilts, September 2022. Liz Truss announced a mini-budget on a Friday. By the following Wednesday the gilt market had broken down so badly that the Bank of England had to step in as buyer of last resort to stop pension funds from collapsing.