David M. Morens served as a senior advisor in NIAID’s Office of the Director from 2006-2022.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Morens, two conspirators, and others, conspired to have an NIH grant for bat coronavirus research reinstated after it had been cancelled by the NIH due to information pointing at the Wuhan Institute of Virology being the source of the COVID-19 outbreak.
To this end, Morens and others concealed information and misled officials, the scientific community, the media, and the public as to the true origins of the virus.
Count 1 - 18 USC 371 - Conspiracy Against the United States
Counts 2 & 3 - 18 USC 1519 - Destruction, Alteration, or Faslification of Records in a Federal Investigation
Counts 4 & 5 - 18 USC 2071 - Concealment, Removal, or Mutilation of Records
Morens is facing up to 46 years in prison if convicted.
Beginning in 2020 and continuing for years after, Morens and others used their personal GMail accounts to comunicate about the cancelled grant, getting another one, and controlling the narrative re: the origins of COVID-19.
They used the Gmail ccounts so as to avoid FOIA request.
Morens enlisted "members of a prominent professional medical organization" to "speak out on behalf of" the "bat coronavirus grant."
Morens "falsely [stated]" to CC1 "that the NIAID FOIA officer had told Morens that he could 'cover' his 'rear' 'by deleting emails and making use of foia delays.'"
"I need to keep this off of govt email and govt phone text."
"Delete or send to gmail."
Morens authored and submitted "a scientific commentary to a prominent medical journal for publication that advocated COVID-19 emerged from nature and not from a lab."
Morens efforts paid off when "NIH [] awarded a $7.5 million grant to" the same company who's bat coronavirus grant has been cancelled.
Upon learning of the grant approval, Morens sent CC1 an email saying, "Ahem... do I get a kickback????"
CC-1 replied, "of course there's a kick-back. It starts with 5 more years of FOIA requests [...] I just hope it doesn't culminate in 5 years of Federal jail..."
Morens and others continued concealing their communications.
"pay attention to the email address you use... The less we provide the enemy the better."
"I learned from our foia lady here how to make emails disappear after I am foia'd but before the search starts, so I think we are all safe."
Morens learns that few things are ever truly deleted forever.
"...I now learn that every email I ever got/sent since 1998 is captured and will be turned over, whether or not I instantly deleted it..."
The group learns that some of these emails are going to go public.
"There is some embarrassing stuff in there, the most heinous is... Some details of what happened with NIH cancellation... my response, and how you helped me shape it...
If these emails are with reporters, they'll use them to create stories as per above..."
"Powerful cabal of scientists from within NIH helped draft anti lab-leak narrative" and "CC-1 suspected WIV may have continued GoF work outside of NIH grant"
"we were working in a cabal to orchestrate stuff"
"should be safe to communicate safely with you, CC1, and others, as long as we use my private gmail."
"keep all communications like this on priate email so that it can't be retrieved via a FOIA."
"leading scientist conspire to undermine investigation into lab leak theory via back-channel..."
đź§µLook past the language of Trump trying to "control" elections, and you see that DHS and DOJ are hard at work trying to clean up our elections.
Reuters uncovered a broader‑than‑previously known Trump administration effort to gain federal control over elections, historically run locally, in at least eight states – using investigations, raids and demands for access to balloting systems and voter ID."
Here's where Reuters gets the language of "control" from. It's understandable, but it's also hyperbole—hyperbole that Trump also uses, so fair is fair.
About one third of the way into the article, Reuters admits Trump isn't really trying to implement a federal takeover of elections.
"Rather than seek a sweeping federal takeover of elections, the administration appears to be testing constitutional limits one state and one county at a time"
Steve Baker, Joseph Hanneman, and their company Veritas Regnat LLC have failed to respond to the libel and slander lawsuit brought against them over their erroneous claims that former Capitol Police officer Shauni Kerkhoff was responsible for the J5 Pipe Bombs.
The judge has ordered the clerk to file an entry of default against them and for the plaintiffs to file a motion for default judgment. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Blaze Media, which was also sued, has filed an unopposed motion for more time to respond to the suit. The judge gave them until June 11, 2026.
In public responses to the lawsuit, Baker has put on a "bring it on!" act, as if he were eager to fight it, to show what evidence he supposedly has, and to use the discovery process to expose some conspiracy to frame Brian J. Cole for the J5 pipe bombs when all along it was Shauni Kerkhoff who planted them as part of a sinister "fedsurrection" plot... or something.
Plaintiff Kerkhoff, who is suing Blaze Media, Steve Baker, Joseph Hanneman, and their company Veritas Regnet for falsely accusing Kerkhoff of being the J5 Pipe Bomber, has filed for a default against Steve Baker, as he has failed to respond to the lawsuit.
đź§µMedia doesn't like it when the DOJ and the FBI get the green light from POTUS and the AG to prosecute people who compromise national security and then hide behind the 1A.
"The stack of news articles Trump provided the acting attorney general was about [MIL] rescue operations"
"Blanche vowed to secure subpoenas specifically targeting the records of reporters who have worked on sensitive national security stories..."
"In recent months, prosecutors have sent subpoenas to media organizations as well as to email and phone providers seeking information in leak inquiries"
DOJ Investigators Gain Access to Fulton's 2020 Election Records as County is Hit w/ New Subpoenas
Lawfare efforts from Abbe Lowell, Norm Eisen, and Fulton County had halted the DOJ’s review of the seized records—some 600 boxes of materials from the 2020 Election.
A federal court has now ruled in favor of the DOJ.
On January 28, 2026, the FBI raided a storage facility in Fulton County, Georgia, to seize records related to the 2020 election. The raid was conducted pursuant to several search warrants arising from a criminal probe into the 2020 election.
That probe is being led by Thomas Albus, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri and Special Counsel to the Attorney General.
During the raid, the FBI collected more than 600 boxes of records, including tabulator receipts, ballots, envelopes, digital records, and other materials.
Days later, the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections filed legal action seeking (1) to stop the DOJ from reviewing the seized materials and (2) a court order requiring the records to be returned.
These motions came in addition to two other legal actions already underway before the raid: one in the Superior Court of Fulton County and another in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
High-powered attorneys Abbe Lowell and Norm Eisen joined Fulton County in this lawfare effort.
đź§µThis VA Supreme Court Opinion is straight fire for ~30 pages.
"From Madison’s era to the present, political parties of every stripe have offered if-by-whiskey arguments supporting partisan gerrymandering."
"Virginians voted by a wide margin [in 2020] to reform the redistricting process in the Commonwealth in an effort to end partisan gerrymandering."
"Under the 2020 amendment, if this bipartisan commission could not reach a consensus, the responsibility to achieve the amendment’s ultimate goal — ridding political partisanship as much as possible from the redistricting task — would become the constitutional responsibility of the Supreme Court of Virginia."