David M. Morens served as a senior advisor in NIAID’s Office of the Director from 2006-2022.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Morens, two conspirators, and others, conspired to have an NIH grant for bat coronavirus research reinstated after it had been cancelled by the NIH due to information pointing at the Wuhan Institute of Virology being the source of the COVID-19 outbreak.
To this end, Morens and others concealed information and misled officials, the scientific community, the media, and the public as to the true origins of the virus.
Count 1 - 18 USC 371 - Conspiracy Against the United States
Counts 2 & 3 - 18 USC 1519 - Destruction, Alteration, or Faslification of Records in a Federal Investigation
Counts 4 & 5 - 18 USC 2071 - Concealment, Removal, or Mutilation of Records
Morens is facing up to 46 years in prison if convicted.
Beginning in 2020 and continuing for years after, Morens and others used their personal GMail accounts to comunicate about the cancelled grant, getting another one, and controlling the narrative re: the origins of COVID-19.
They used the Gmail ccounts so as to avoid FOIA request.
Morens enlisted "members of a prominent professional medical organization" to "speak out on behalf of" the "bat coronavirus grant."
Morens "falsely [stated]" to CC1 "that the NIAID FOIA officer had told Morens that he could 'cover' his 'rear' 'by deleting emails and making use of foia delays.'"
"I need to keep this off of govt email and govt phone text."
"Delete or send to gmail."
Morens authored and submitted "a scientific commentary to a prominent medical journal for publication that advocated COVID-19 emerged from nature and not from a lab."
Morens efforts paid off when "NIH [] awarded a $7.5 million grant to" the same company who's bat coronavirus grant has been cancelled.
Upon learning of the grant approval, Morens sent CC1 an email saying, "Ahem... do I get a kickback????"
CC-1 replied, "of course there's a kick-back. It starts with 5 more years of FOIA requests [...] I just hope it doesn't culminate in 5 years of Federal jail..."
Morens and others continued concealing their communications.
"pay attention to the email address you use... The less we provide the enemy the better."
"I learned from our foia lady here how to make emails disappear after I am foia'd but before the search starts, so I think we are all safe."
Morens learns that few things are ever truly deleted forever.
"...I now learn that every email I ever got/sent since 1998 is captured and will be turned over, whether or not I instantly deleted it..."
The group learns that some of these emails are going to go public.
"There is some embarrassing stuff in there, the most heinous is... Some details of what happened with NIH cancellation... my response, and how you helped me shape it...
If these emails are with reporters, they'll use them to create stories as per above..."
"Powerful cabal of scientists from within NIH helped draft anti lab-leak narrative" and "CC-1 suspected WIV may have continued GoF work outside of NIH grant"
"we were working in a cabal to orchestrate stuff"
"should be safe to communicate safely with you, CC1, and others, as long as we use my private gmail."
"keep all communications like this on priate email so that it can't be retrieved via a FOIA."
"leading scientist conspire to undermine investigation into lab leak theory via back-channel..."
"The sources declined to disclose the exact number or locations of CIA facilities hit by Iranian drones. One source put the number at 'more than one and fewer than a dozen.' A second source said several facilities were hit."
"U.S. intelligence officials have not yet reached firm conclusions about the possible Russian involvement in the attacks on CIA facilities. But they cited the strikes' effectiveness and apparent precision, as well as Russia's broader technical support for Iran, as possible evidence."
"At least two CIA sites were struck in March, Reuters and other outlets have reported. One of the facilities was the CIA station in Saudi Arabia, which is located in the U.S. embassy in Riyadh, and a separate site was located in eastern Iraq. Some of the sources said additional CIA sites had been hit, but they did not disclose details."
🧵Fmr CIA Director Brennon is seeking a court order that would require Blanche, Kash, Ratcliffe, and others to preserve records from the ongoing investigations targeting him.
If indicted, he plans to file motion(s) to dismiss based on vindictive and selective prosecution, so he'll need those records to support such a motion.
The folks named in the lawsuit are already required to preserve such records, but Brennan is asking a judge to tell them they better do it, or else...
The complaint confirms two investigations into Brennan:
When arguing against the Terrorism Enhancement being applied at your sentencing, it's probably best practice that you DO NOT include any letters from a member of Hizballah, even if he is your brother.
Alex Saab will be resentenced on July 10, 2026.
I wrote about Saab, his crimes, and his extraordinary arrest years ago.
Saab was facing about 20 years in prison, but in 2023 the Biden Admin swapped him back to Venezuela in exchange for 10 American hostages plus "Fat Leonard," a corrupt defense contractor at the center of a Pentagon bribery scandal.
Judge McFadden DENIES the defense's motion to disqualify @USAttyPirro and @DAGToddBlanche from the case.
Defense had argued that Blanche and Pirro being at the scene of the alleged crime and publicly commenting on it had created a conflict.
The four main arguments were the following:
(1) Their presence at the WHCA Dinner made them witnesses (both reported hearing the gunshots)
(2) Their presence at the WHCA Dinner made them potential victims of Allen (according to the gov't's theory of the case), (both reported that they were in the “line of fire” and had to be evacuated)
(3) Blanche and Pirro's statements to media about the events at the WHCA Dinner were prejudicial and showed bias
(4) Citing the longtime friendship of Trump and Pirro, Trump being the alleged intended victim, and Pirro being the prosecutor, this created an appearance of impropriety. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Judge McFadden addresses argument (1)—Blanche and Pirro were witnesses.
"...whatever firsthand knowledge they have about Allen’s actions appears limited to what anyone in the ballroom would have..."
"...absent special circumstances, an attorney can “elect in which capacity [he] intend[s] to proceed, either as counsel or as a witness.” Because neither side indicates that it plans to call Blanche or Pirro as a witness, the advocate-witness rule poses no concerns."