Daniel Baeza Profile picture
Apr 29 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Everyone says the US dollar dominates because of the “petrodollar.”

This is wrong.

The petro-dollar didn’t create dollar dominance.
Dollar dominance created the petro-dollar.

A 🧵that debunks this petro-dollar myth Image
The US$ is not powerful because of oil priced in its currency

The US$ is powerful because banks all over the world create their own $, on their own balance sheets, with the tacit acceptance of Fed and US Treasury but beyond their regulatory reach.

Enter the EURO-dollar market Image
Petro$ story gets cause/effect backwards.

Oil producers priced barrels in $ in 1970s because an infrastructure of global $ banking was already in place.

Banks worldwide manufacture $ via lending. These are real, usable $ for trade and finance, even if they never touch US soil. Image
Any bank, anywhere, can expand its balance sheet and create a $ liability.
That liability becomes someone's $ asset.
That’s offshore money creation.

Scale matters:
- $14tn in offshore $ liabilities (euro$)
- vs $19tn in US banking system
= 40% of all $ are created outside the US Image
Oil wasn’t priced in $ to create demand for $.
Oil was priced in $ because a deep, liquid $ banking system already existed globally.

Infrastructure first, pricing second.
a) Banks create $ liquidity
b) Trade gets financed in $
c) Merchants invoice in $ Image
And when this system cracks?
The FED steps in via Swap lines with other central banks. These are $ liquidity backstops to the eurodollar market.

Swap lines are USD loans. Loans need to be paid back. And as such create $ demand. Swap lines dollarize the world.
@SantiagoAuFund Image
In a credit-based system, the currency that private banks create the most of globally wins.
And that is the US dollar.

The dollar’s power isn’t about oil. It’s about a self-reinforcing global credit system where:
Banks create $ -> Trade uses $ -> Fed backstops $

Sorry $ doomers

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel Baeza

Daniel Baeza Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dbaeza13

Mar 16
When a bank faces insolvency, there is no rescue from central banks.

There are two paths to bank insolvency:
1️⃣ Losses in the investment portfolio (orange)
2️⃣ Deterioration of the loan portfolio (blue)

Two routes, one same fatal destination.
🧵 Image
First, a key clarification many people confuse.

Central banks:
✅ can help banks facing liquidity problems
❌ cannot solve insolvency problems

If a bank’s assets are worth less than its liabilities, no liquidity facility can save it, only outright capital injections will do. Image
Path 1 to insolvency: investment losses
Victim: Silicon Valley Bank

Banks invest deposits in US govt bonds.
These bonds have 0 credit risk, but they do have duration risk.

When rates ⬆️
• bond prices ⬇️
• unrealized losses ⬆️

Duration is helluva force
Read 9 tweets
Nov 24, 2025
Stablecoins (SCs): The Most Important Bridge Between Traditional Finance & Crypto

Here’s a complete explainer covering:
1️⃣ What stablecoins are
2️⃣ How they work
3️⃣ Why they matter
4️⃣ Risks & regulation
5️⃣ Industry impact Image
A stablecoin is a digital asset pegged to a stable currency, often $1.
Issued on blockchains and Redeemable 1:1.
Backed by real assets like:
- Cash
- U.S. T-bills
- Repos
- Cash equivalents

Think of SCs as internet-native digital dollars.
Two giants control ~86% of the ~$250B SC market:

USDT (Tether): ~$158B
USDC (Circle): ~$61B

Institutional adoption + U.S. regulation talk accelerated growth. Image
Read 13 tweets
Nov 7, 2025
Emisión Activista del Tesoro (EAT):

Cómo EEUU usa las letras para mover la liquidez y por qué eso es política monetaria disfrazada.

🧵sobre la adicción de Tesoro de EEUU a las letras y cómo esa estrategia convierte la gestión de deuda en una nueva forma de política de liquidez. Image
EAT= Tesoro usa su emisión para afectar la liquidez

- ⬆️liquidez en parte corta de curva
- ⬇️duración de sistema (WAM gráfico)
- ⬇️costo de deuda
- suaviza condiciones financieras

Convierte la gestión de deuda en una herramienta de liquidez, el contrapeso fiscal del QE/QT. Image
EAT como gestión de liquidez:
En los próximos 2 años, el Tesoro cubrirá la mayor parte del nuevo endeudamiento con letras, no con bonos largos.

La emisión alcanzará $600 Bn – $1.1 Tn en 2026-27 (entre 2 y 3.5x el promedio histórico). Image
Read 7 tweets
Sep 27, 2025
Desmontemos otra narrativa mainstream

"Bancos Centrales están reemplazando reservas en US$ por reservas de oro, lo cual evidencia el deterioro del estatus del $ en el sistema global"

Para entender el error es necesario saber qué tipo de BCs compran oro y su relación con el $
🧵 Image
Cuáles BCs compran oro?
No todos los BCs acumulan oro.

✅ Mercados emergentes (EM) (China, Rusia, India, Turquía) son los que ⬆️ reservas oro
✖️ Mercados desarrollados (DM) no ⬆️ reservas oro

Esto importa porque el emisor del $ (🇺🇸) y sus aliados (🇪🇺 y 🇯🇵) siguen anclados al $ Image
Mercados emergentes siguen siendo economías impulsadas por las exportaciones a ... Países desarrollados ricos y reciben pagos en $/€/¥.

Ese vínculo comercial significa que EM no pueden simplemente decidir liquidar exportaciones en oro. Dependen de los consumidores de los DM. Image
Read 9 tweets
Sep 26, 2025
Narrativa mainstream dice:
- capital extranjero está huyendo de mercados de EEUU,
- señal de pérdida de confianza en el estatus de refugio del $
= por eso el $ está débil

Los datos no están de acuerdo

No es una corrida sobre el dólar, es una carrera para cubrir el dólar

Un 🧵 Image
Inversores foráneos en mercados EEUU tienen 2 riesgos:
1. Activo subyacente (acciones/bonos)
2. Moneda ($) que activos están denominados

Inversores pueden cubrir cualquier lado:
- Cobertura de activo (venta activo)
- Cubrir la moneda (vender $ en mercado FX)

Ambos ⬇️ riesgo
Hoy, inversores mantienen niveles récord de acciones EEUU (>18% del mercado)

Ellos eligen mantener el activo en $ (lo opuesto a una pérdida de confianza en EEUU)

...y en cambio están vendiendo $USD como cobertura

Así que DXY débil = cobertura de $, no una fuga de capitales $ Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 9, 2025
🧵de por qué un cambio de sistema monetario o reset de deuda es fábula

En sistema actual, mayor parte del dinero lo crean bancos comerciales al dar préstamos.

Préstamo genera un activo (préstamo) y pasivo (depósito). Cada $ creado por crédito tiene una obligación de deuda en $ Image
El sistema depende de la constante refinanciación de deuda y la expansión de nuevo crédito para funcionar.

Si el crédito se contrae -> depósitos (dinero) se destruyen -> deudas del sector privado en $ aún deben pagarse -> crisis de liquidez

Esto genera inestabilidad sistémica. Image
Dado que préstamos generan depósitos y estos se utilizan para repagar deuda, sistema necesita generar nuevo crédito para cubrir principal/intereses

Sin nuevos préstamos, no hay suficiente dinero para pagar deuda/intereses

Es estructura circular que colapsa si deja de expandirse
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(