When elected officials begin communicating like conspiracy influencers, something fundamental has changed in politics.
What we are watching is not simply the spread of “conspiracy theories,” but the mainstreaming of conspiracist aesthetics and communication styles into modern political culture itself 🧵
Research on populist political communication has increasingly examined how modern political actors use emotional narratives, anti-elite framing and “hidden truth” rhetoric to build audience engagement and identity.
This shift has accelerated dramatically in the algorithmic age, where politics increasingly competes not just for votes, but for attention.
1/ QAnon was a major turning point in this evolution, not because every claim was believed literally, but because it demonstrated how participatory conspiracy ecosystems could create highly emotionally invested political audiences.
Politics stopped functioning purely as ideology and increasingly became:
- interactive narrative,
- online mythology,
- fandom culture,
- and perpetual “decoding” of hidden meaning.
Researchers studying online conspiracy communities observed how these systems rewarded participation, identity and emotional immersion:
Research into algorithmic amplification and misinformation ecosystems has repeatedly shown that emotionally charged content spreads more effectively online:
This is why modern political communication increasingly resembles influencer culture, livestream drama and reality television more than traditional institutional politics.
2/ Importantly, conspiracist political culture does not emerge in a vacuum.
It often grows fastest during periods of institutional distrust and social fragmentation.
These events created fertile ground for "what else are they hiding?" narratives because many people increasingly lost faith in traditional institutions, media and expertise.
This does NOT mean every conspiracy theory becomes true.
But it does help explain why conspiracist styles of communication become politically useful.
Research into conspiracy thinking repeatedly finds that uncertainty, distrust and social anxiety create environments where simplistic hidden-enemy narratives become emotionally attractive:
Elon Musk & X: promises that didn’t materialise
X as a "free speech platform"
Musk repeatedly described X as a platform for maximum free speech, neutrality, and viewpoint diversity.
What actually happened by end-2025:
Selective enforcement of rules
Journalists, researchers, and critics suspended or throttled,
Government requests complied with quietly,
Amplification skewed toward paying or ideologically aligned accounts
🔗 Reuters — Researchers, journalists sanctioned on X: reuters.com/technology/mus…
🔗 Amnesty / human rights critique: amnesty.org/en/latest/news…
X didn’t become a free-speech platform, it became a selective speech platform with algorithmic preference.
X would "defeat bots and spam"
Musk said fixing bots was a top priority and would be largely solved.
Reality by 2025:
Bot networks persist in ever increasing numbers.
Spam replies increased after verification changes.
Researchers documented coordinated amplification.
"Pay-to-boost" made manipulation easier, not harder.
🔗 Reuters — Researchers warn of coordinated manipulation on X: reuters.com/technology/res…
🔗 Center for Countering Digital Hate: counterhate.com/research/twitt…
X would be "financially sustainable"
Musk said X would quickly reach profitability through subscriptions and ads.
Reality by late 2025:
Major advertisers did not fully return
Ad revenue significantly below pre-acquisition levels
Subscriptions failed to replace lost ad income
🔗 Financial Times — X revenue struggles: ft.com/content/9b7e7b…
🔗 Reuters — Advertiser retreat continues: reuters.com/technology/adv…
Ever notice how Trump-world accounts sound less like leaders & more like 15-second adverts?
🚨 “Record highs!”
🚨 “Strongest ever!”
🚨 “America winning again!”
It’s propaganda disguised as ad copy — short, hyped, and hollow. Let’s unpack. 🧵
2/ They cherry-pick numbers: GDP, oil output, stock market blips.
But ignore the bigger picture:
– $34 TRILLION national debt 📉
– Crumbling infrastructure 🚧
– Skyrocketing healthcare costs 💊
– Schools & communities underfunded 🏫
That’s not “winning.”
3/ They love to shout “Drill, baby, drill” like it’s 2008.
But here’s the cost of that slogan:
– U.S. climate disasters topped $90 billion in 2023 🌪️🔥
– Texas & Florida hit hardest 💀
– Insurance companies literally pulling out of whole states
Drilling ≠ thriving.
🧵 “Ukraine’s army is full of Nazis!”: not quite. Let’s fact-check that Le Monde report that is being pushed at the moment by various pro Ru sources🧐
1/ Le Monde identified 350 soldiers posting Nazi symbols online — not military policy, not battalion patches, but personal social media misuse.
2/ Of those, ~200 were from the 3rd Assault Brigade, a large and visible unit descended from Azov. But again — 200 soldiers ≠ entire army.
📊 Out of ~500,000 active troops, that’s 0.07%.
3/ Many symbols accused of being Nazi aren’t — they’re Ukrainian nationalist or historical military insignia that look similar. Others were misused, and those are worth condemning.