Tribunal Tweets Profile picture
May 13 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
This is the second part of the morning session on Day 2 of Lorna Young (LY) v Manchester City Council (MCC), held at Manchester Employment Tribunal.
AM Apologies. I have one more page around this time - a response from Nick McMillan, so sorry to hear etc. So there was a response from HR
LY Nick and I go back a long way. He rang me although I couldn't answer. I saw that email.
AM Do you know why he rang you
LY Assume Jane contacted him, and they and James Binks were involved when call made.
AM Sarah will speak for herself but my understanding is that Sarah was unaware of these events. She continued, interviewed Barry, Sharmila, Demi. [to doc, interview with Demi]
AM Clear here that Demi aware of GG account. She says this upset Michelle and Barry who have more awareness of subject matter than I do. Members of EDI aware that GG account was yours and subject of some discussion.
LY I read these statement quite recently. Struck me as painful

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tribunal Tweets

Tribunal Tweets Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tribunaltweets

May 12
We will continue with the second part of this afternoon's hearing afer a break.
We've rejoined.
AM - paras 41 of SN's WS, she talks abt emails recd. She was out of office and picked up on 22 Nov. Trib will hear that out of offcie included 17 Nov. Came back day you met with her. You will have recd an out of office.
LY I don't recall that.
AM - quotes from LY 's email to SN re scope of Ix. Another email 21/11 and make a correction to something abt scope. Now , well, I'm telling you and Miss N will tell you she wasn't in office until 22 NOv. So not surprisng o substaive response is it?
LY (missed)
Read 49 tweets
May 12
We will shortly be reporting at 2pm on the Manchester Employment Tribunal covering Lorna Young (LY) vs Manchester City Council (MCC).
LY is gender critical and Catholic and was formerly Equality Team Manager at MCC. She was dismissed from this role due to her social media content.Image
Panel members must have already read the case papers as they had no reading time today. Here's this morning's reporting. Lorna Young has started giving evidence.
We're a collective of volunteer citizen journalists and are not paid for our work. Please support us by subscribing to our Substack (link in bio above) which funds our digital & some travel costs. We report what we hear in good faith but do not provide a transcript of proceedings.
Read 57 tweets
May 12
We will shortly be live tweeting from Manchester Employment Tribunal covering Lorna Young (LY) vs Manchester City Council (MCC).
LY is gender critical and Catholic and was formerly Equality Team Manager at MCC. She was dismissed from this role due to her social media content. Image
LY claims:
(a) Direct discrimination because of religion or belief;
(b) Harassment related to religion or belief;
(c) Discrimination arising from disability;
(d) Harassment related to disibility;
(e) Unfair dismissal.
We're a collective of volunteer citizen journalists and are not paid for our work. Please support us by subscribing to our Substack (link in bio above) which funds our digital & some travel costs.

We report what we hear in good faith but do not provide a transcript of proceedings.
Read 75 tweets
May 6
We resume.
J - I want to go back to parts of C's pleaded case. What is the act of indirect discrimination against the C and where do we see it.
NC - I say it is the state of affairs, that the R has adopted GI as it's institutional belief.
J - what is the act of indirect discrim
NC - I want to go to para 22, a person discriminates against another if it applies to her which is a PCP that is discriminatory, whether it is discriminatory is a matter of law. It applies it as an ongoing state of affairs. It is applies or would be applied to all members of
Read 16 tweets
May 6
We expect to be reporting this morning from 10 am on a preliminary hearing in MacDonald (C) vs Public and Commercial Services Union (R). The R is seeking to strike out significant portions of C's claim. Image
Link to our Substack with background on the case and the preliminary hearing can be found here.
open.substack.com/pub/tribunaltw…
A reminder to readers that our reporting should be considered as a whole. It is not a verbatim transcript of proceedings as we explain in our Substack as linked via our X bio. We report in good faith and make all efforts to ensure our output is fair and accurate.
Read 88 tweets
Mar 20
This is part 2 of day 5 in the case of LS vs NHSE England: part 1 of this session's tweeting is at
The court is at present taking a short break, and we expect to resume about 3.45pm.
We are restarting.

J: Anything on Debique, NC?
NC: I think SC and I are agreed that it doesn't take us forward; group disadvantage in this case has been agreed, so we don't need to go there.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(