The @thetimes highlights the tweaks made by Bridget Phillipson, which by the media reaction seem to have done nothing to reduce the rage the Code has induced in gender identity activists.
‘Councils, NHS trusts and businesses had used the absence of the guidance to delay updating their policies, despite warnings they were breaching the law’
We don’t generally evade paywalls, hope the screenshots are useful
/
thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
‘Councils, NHS trusts and businesses had used the absence of the guidance to delay updating their policies, despite warnings they were breaching the law’
We don’t generally evade paywalls, hope the screenshots are useful
/
thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
This in particular is shocking. The tactics (including in the media) were to create a fog of confusion around the Supreme Court ruling, and Baroness Falkner had repeatedly tried to cut through it, explaining that the law is clear. This unministerial accusation is the response.
/
/
It’s a parting shot to degrade Baroness Falkner’s credibility in what will undoubtedly be a period of continued legal and media sniping. Here is the (very due) response.
/
/
Further key points
This is highly relevant and not a question we’ve seen asked today
https://twitter.com/akuareindorf/status/2057543639715180601
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
