ChrisO_wiki Profile picture
May 24 27 tweets 7 min read Read on X
1/ Russia's Oreshnik missile is clearly losing its cachet as a 'wonder weapon'. Many Russian warbloggers express frustration and weariness, calling it a propaganda gimmick. One says it's a "humiliating circus, a clown dance on the bones of Russians." ⬇️
2/ The ultra-nationalist 'Russian Movement of Strelkov' (a group of supporters of the imprisoned Igor Girkin) is scathing about the use last night of Oreshnik against targets in Kyiv and Bila Tserkva:
3/ "Hmm...

Just another bunch of empty shells that, aside from being “kind of a cool special effect,” don’t really accomplish anything—or are we supposed to be thrilled about the craters they leave behind, which won’t punish the enemy for Starobilsk in the slightest?
4/ "What can I say, a strategically brilliant proposal from our Ministry of Defence — to launch a strike on Saturday-to-Sunday night...

What can I say, if you want to celebrate a record in firing ballistic missiles — go ahead, but it has zero usefulness.
5/ "By morning, it’ll turn out that not a single bridge has been destroyed, nor the Kyiv Hydroelectric Power Plant or the Kaniv Hydroelectric Power Plant.
6/ "And yes, the front-row spectators are watching the action with enthusiasm; the adrenaline is pumping, but there’s no fear. It’s just interesting to watch the “lights” there; they don’t feel any threat, and judging by the footage, the lighting is fine there too—just saying..."
7/ 'Comrade Artyom' is similarly scathing about the strikes' performative character:

"As a result of the "retaliatory strikes," hot water suddenly appeared in some areas of Kyiv. It hadn't been there since January 19th."
8/ "As I predicted, not a single person responsible for the murder of Russian children was harmed, not even a scratch. Moreover, not a single administrative building was destroyed where even the most ordinary perpetrators of the murder of Russian children could have been."
9/ Alex Kartavyhk, who has now escaped to exile in Vietnam, writes:

"There doesn't seem to be anything particularly interesting regarding the targets, at least at this time. So if they didn't uncover anything interesting, then the retaliatory strike isn't exactly impressive."
10/ Vladimir Romanov also isn't impressed:

"100,500 Nazis, 500 NATO instructors, and ten NATO generals were eliminated. Actually, no—20 NATO generals—no need to feel sorry for them. They’ve all been avenged.

Like the picture? Pretty, isn’t it?
11/ "There aren’t even any explosions.

Just a bunch of stupidly expensive hardware buried in the ground. All for the sake of a pretty picture that no one (except pensioners) believes in anymore.
12/ "It would be a good idea if we woke up one morning and read that Starlink satellites were disabled and no longer broadcasting internet, and that all the UAV production locations in Europe, as published by the Ministry of Defence,…
13/ …had caught fire and are now engulfed in massive fires that have destroyed these facilities.

But no. Our pensioners are exhausted."

Alexey Zhivov wonders what the point of it was, and asks: "why is this a retaliatory strike?"
14/ "If at night, in a deserted hour, targets directly related to military operations against Russia are hit, then either I'm missing something, or this is routine, planned military work that the Aerospace Forces are supposed to carry out regularly.
15/ "▪️ What is the retribution then?

▪️Have the masterminds and perpetrators of the Starobilsk child murders been killed?

▪️Is the enemy no longer able to carry out such attacks?

▪️Were the Ukrainian government's leaders or apparatus harmed?
16/ "What is the essence and content of the third strike by Oreshnik? Is there an official who can explain this to the public in simple Russian?
17/ "I've been trying all morning to figure out if even a single empty building associated with the Main Intelligence Directorate, the Security Service of Ukraine, the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Zelenskyy, and his administration was damaged overnight. Apparently, none."
18/ 'Thirteenth' is likewise sceptical:

"What's the point of firing a blank slug without a warhead and calling it "Oreshnik"? Did it kill anyone there? Zelensky, for example? No?

It won't bring back the lives of the dead children, it won't end the war."
19/ "It'll just create a fuss in the media, nothing more. Retribution, yeah.

Now, if there had been a lunar crater left in the place of Kyiv this morning, then yeah, I'd agree. But as it is... It's all just blatant show-offs, for outsiders.
20/ "Yeah, the explosions are cool. But the question is different!

What's the point of attacking at night? (When there's hardly anyone in those buildings?)

Why hasn't any of Ukraine's leadership been killed?

Why is Zelenskyy still alive?"
21/ "I doubt anyone can answer these three questions.

Well, explosions and explosions. What are the results? What's the efficiency of this shitload of missiles and drones?"

Dmitry Steshin is also wondering what the point was:
22/ "The morning began with a search for meaning and effect in the "retaliatory strike." Judging by the Ukrainian media and blogs, they weren't impressed. The video of the fires in Kyiv, for example, was filmed from a car driving across the Dnipro bridge.
23/ "Which, in a way, seems humiliating. Just as humiliating were yesterday's mass chanting for Bandera in Lviv. Sending the "Oreshnik" missile there never occurred to anyone. That would have been very powerful. Logical.
24/ "Furthermore, our patriotic public has some awkward, politically immature questions: does this "Oreshnik" missile even have a "warhead"? And how much does it cost to launch one missile? There are some really awkward questions about Iran, but we'll leave them out."
25/ 'Larkin' is clearly angry:

"Oreshnik is like Novichok – no one has ever died from it.🤷🏻‍♂️

This time it doesn't even explode; it's just a fireworks show for the Ukrainians.

A humiliating circus, a clown dance on the bones of Russians." /end

[To be continued]

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ChrisO_wiki

ChrisO_wiki Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChrisO_wiki

Jun 16
1/ Sevastopol is effectively under siege from Ukrainian drones, prompting some Russians to make comparisons with the sieges of 1855 and 1942. Others compare it to J.R.R. Tolkien's Minas Tirith. However, unity is lacking among the inhabitants, says a Russian warblogger. ⬇️ Image
2/ 'Near the War' describes a recent visit to Sevastopol:

"I confess, I thought several times before driving from Donetsk to Sevastopol. Military acquaintances had long warned me that the enemy might attempt to blockade the Crimean Peninsula."
3/ "And since early May, the R-280 "Novorossiya" highway has been under attack by Ukrainian Hornet drones.On the way to Sevastopol, we saw the aftermath of these artificially intelligent hornets' hunt:…
Read 20 tweets
Jun 16
1/ Former Roscosmos CEO and current Russian Senator Dmitry Rogizin has a novel suggestion for deterring Western countries from seizing 'shadow fleet' tankers. He advocates turning them into giant bombs by rigging them to explode if they're captured. ⬇️ Image
2/ Commenting on the British seizure of the Russian shadow fleet tanker SMYRTOS at the weekend, Rogizin – like many other Russian commentators – likens it to an act of piracy. He suggests:
3/ "I believe we should mine the tankers we use. Initiation should occur when appropriate commands are received or when a tanker deviates from its route and is forced to enter a foreign port.
Read 13 tweets
Jun 16
1/ Russian warbloggers have rushed to disclaim blame for the attack on the historic Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. They claim the Ukrainians did it themselves, argue that the church isn't sacred to the Ukrainians, and say Ukraine just wants Russia to look bad. ⬇️
2/ Damage, what damage?, asks Andrey Medvedev, claiming that the whole thing was faked for the cameras:

"There's no need to restore anything in general. There's no damage. It's just a vivid night picture. Which suggests a deliberate arson for the sake of a photo."
3/ Lev Vershinin says the church was a legitimate military target:

"My busy schedule prevented me from commenting on the strikes on Kyiv this morning, and thank God for that, because I might have said something stupid in the heat of the moment."
Read 56 tweets
Jun 15
1/ Iran has reportedly assessed that Donald Trump is "mentally incompetent" and has incorporated psychologists into its negotiating team to adapt the wording of the proposed agreement "as if the recipient were a [mental] patient ... whose capacity is limited." ⬇️ Image
2/ The Russian 'Political Report' says that "Iranian authorities have included leading psychologists in the negotiating team to review drafts of all messages before sending them to Trump."
3/ "This is not a supplementary measure, but a direct consequence of an internal assessment that the American president is mentally incompetent, whose reactions cannot be predicted by conventional diplomatic methods.
Read 12 tweets
Jun 15
1/ The news at the weekend that the British Royal Marines have seized a Russian shadow fleet tanker in the English Channel has aroused anger and expressions of shame from Russian warbloggers. They demand that the Russian government should take action. ⬇️
2/ 'Alex Parker Returns' characterises the seizure as "Captain Price landing on a tanker of the Russian shadow fleet. I remind you that you can get revenge on the Brit who is causing trouble by voting for United Russia and rallying more strongly around the president. Be good!"
3/ 'Novorossiya militia reports' declares:
"The British have openly entered into war with Russia, no longer hiding behind either the "law" or their proxies."
Read 19 tweets
Jun 15
1/ Russian commanders routinely make false claims to have captured territory, in order to win awards and personal bonuses. However, the army is reportedly stepping up efforts to uncover instances of "painting over" the map of the front line in Ukraine. ⬇️
2/ Russian warblogger Vladimir Romanov highlights how the practice is causing mass casualties among Russian soldiers, with some commanders maintaining two parallel maps – one of the true line of contact, and a more flattering 'painted over' version to show to their superiors.
3/ "Returning to the paint-overs, the higher-ups periodically conduct compliance checks on the personnel data.

In some places (like in the Kupyansk sector), this is purely formal.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(