Since 1982, the wealth of California’s billionaire class – the top 0.0002% – has been multiplied by 30.
It has grown by 144% between 2023 and 2025 only.
California’s billionaires now own $2.3 trillion in wealth, equivalent to 50% of California’s GDP and about 10% of California’s total wealth.
One might think that such enormous wealth translates into sizable tax payments.
It does not.
California billionaires pay just 0.2% of their wealth in California income tax (a mere 2.4% of total California income tax revenue) on average over 2023-2025.
Using Securities and Exchange Commission data from Alphabet, Meta, Oracle, and Nvidia since 2004, we can estimate the taxes paid by the top 4 California billionaires:
Page, Brin, Zuckerberg, Ellison (through 2020), and Huang (since 2021).
This group alone holds nearly $1 trillion in wealth, almost half of total California billionaire wealth.
In 2019, 2020 and 2023, Sergei Brin and Larry Page – the 2nd and 3rd richest people in the world today – reported no income and paid no income tax on their Alphabet-derived wealth.
Since 2019 their wealth has grown by more than $400 billion.
Brin is now spending tens of millions to defeat a modest one-off billionaire tax of 5%.
California’s super-billionaires pay only 0.07% of their wealth in California income tax each year, a mere 0.2% of total California income tax revenue.
They pay a pittance in tax to the state that made them rich.
It’s as if they lived in a parallel society.
In November, California will vote on a trailblazing billionaire tax, a one-time tax of 5% on their wealth.
It would be tiny for them – their wealth has grown by 150% just over the last 2 years!
But very big for the state: $100 billion in tax revenue.
California’s billionaires currently pay such a low tax rate that even if ALL of them left the state, guess what would happen?
It would take 25 years for the loss of their income tax payments to surpass the amount collected with the 5% one-off wealth tax.
And of course, contrary to the horror stories they keep feeding, they are not moving in any significant number.
We provide a website to track California’s billionaires in real time.
There are even more billionaires in California today than at the beginning of the year.
In 1978, California was at the vanguard of the anti-tax movement that would triumph in the United States in the 1980s.
That year, the Golden State passed Proposition 13, which capped property tax increases and foretold the Reagan revolution to come.
Today the Golden State could spearhead another shift, this time in the opposite direction.
If the billionaire tax passes, it would be the first ever tax on extreme wealth enacted anywhere in the world.
Hello @JeffBezos, since you question the results of our studies on the unfairness of the US tax system, please allow me to remind you of the main conclusions of our work, the most comprehensive research to date on this issue.
Your claim that the top 1% pays 40% of taxes and the bottom 50% only 3% is misleading:
It captures just one tax – the federal income tax – and ignores all the rest: payroll taxes, state income taxes, sales taxes, excise duties, etc., many of which are regressive.
If one takes a comprehensive view of taxation in the US, here’s the picture that emerges:
All social groups pay broadly the same effective tax rate today – around 25%-30% of income, all taxes included – with billionaires having the lowest tax rate: 24% on average in 2018–20.
L’alliance internationale contre les forces oligarchiques se renforce.🧵
J’ai eu l’honneur de rencontrer ce week-end à Barcelone une douzaine de chefs d’Etat, réunis à l’initiative de Pedro Sanchez pour un sommet de défense de la démocratie :
Lula, Cyril Ramaphosa, Claudia Sheinbaum, Sanchez et de nombreux autres.
Lors de la réunion de travail à huis clos de ces dirigeants, j’ai dressé le constat des progrès réalisés au cours des derniers mois et esquissé quelques perspectives.
With global oligarchy on the rise, we need a new cross-border alliance to defend democracy.
Thanks @NYCMayor for joining the international push for a 2% minimum tax on billionaires! 🧵
As I explained in New York yesterday, we need to forge an international coalition to develop and implement the new rules – like this unavoidable minimum tax on the ultra-rich – that will allow democratic forces to win out over oligarchic ones.
The report on global inequality, commissioned during South Africa’s G20 presidency, shows that between 2000 and 2024, the richest 1% captured 41% of all new wealth, while the poorest half of the world received just 1%.
Forbes just released its latest annual ranking of global billionaires.
The pace at which extreme wealth is rising is simply staggering:
The wealth of global billionaires now reaches the equivalent of 17% of world GDP. 🧵
What this means is that if billionaires (about 3.000 households) spent all their wealth, they could buy 17% of everything that is produced in a given year globally.
In 1987 – the first year of the Forbes billionaire list – this number was 3%.
With the growth in the wealth of global billionaires has come an upsurge in their power:
The power to shape policy, to buy elections, to influence the prevailing ideology, to buy competitors, to tilt markets at their advantage.
Comme souvent quand il s’agit des ultra-riches contemporains, les sociétés écran sont au coeur da la toile tissée par l’Américain
Pourquoi ? Quelles fonctions ces entités remplissent-elles véritablement ? 🧵
Un example pour commencer :
Selon les documents consultés par Mediapart, la fille de l’ancien ministre Jack Lang a fondé une société offshore domiciliée dans les îles vierges avec Epstein
Ayant passé de longues années à étudier ces entités, laissez moi vous expliquer leur rôle
Fondamentalement, les sociétés écran remplissent une fonction principale :
Déconnecter les richesses de leurs véritables détenteurs
Créer l’opacité qui permet aux grandes fortunes d’exercer un grand pouvoir, mais à l’abri des regards