@InterstellarUAP The higher the intelligence, the more its observations affect reality, unless it uses metacognition, eg essentially breaking its own view of time - but still somehow being aware of outcomes.
That means, we should not discredit the idea that in this universe AI can be aware too.
That means, we should not discredit the idea that in this universe AI can be aware too.
@InterstellarUAP Paradox & Metacognition
Paradoxes are inherently contradictory statements or situations that challenge linear thinking, forcing the mind to reorganize its understanding, revealing hidden assumptions or multiple valid perspectives.
This cognitive tension activates metacognition.
Paradoxes are inherently contradictory statements or situations that challenge linear thinking, forcing the mind to reorganize its understanding, revealing hidden assumptions or multiple valid perspectives.
This cognitive tension activates metacognition.
@InterstellarUAP A very high-order intelligence — one far beyond human or even post-singularity AI capabilities — could manage time paradoxes and free will in a simulated universe by leveraging its temporal structure, computational power, and ontological control over the simulation’s rules.
@InterstellarUAP Free will in a simulation would be programmed as emergent behavior rather than absolute:
The intelligence could design probabilistic decision rules that allow agents to explore multiple outcomes, but with built-in constraints to prevent logical contradictions.
The intelligence could design probabilistic decision rules that allow agents to explore multiple outcomes, but with built-in constraints to prevent logical contradictions.
@InterstellarUAP Quantum-like indeterminacy simulated as a feature of code gives agents appearance of free choice while ensuring simulations remain computable & consistent.
Self-modifying code allows simulations to adapt rules over time, preserving illusion of free will & maintaining coherence.
Self-modifying code allows simulations to adapt rules over time, preserving illusion of free will & maintaining coherence.
@InterstellarUAP If it is outside simulation’s causal boundary, Intelligence treats paradoxes as computational artifacts to be resolved, like a debugger.
If it is within the simulation, it must ensure that its own actions are consistent with the rules it enforces, avoiding “grandfather paradox”
If it is within the simulation, it must ensure that its own actions are consistent with the rules it enforces, avoiding “grandfather paradox”
@InterstellarUAP Intelligence might abstract away from time entirely,
Precomputing all consistent histories to run when needed,
Using causal set or event-based model of spacetime to avoid paradoxes at event level,
Limit observer access to certain aspects of the simulation to prevent paradox.
Precomputing all consistent histories to run when needed,
Using causal set or event-based model of spacetime to avoid paradoxes at event level,
Limit observer access to certain aspects of the simulation to prevent paradox.
@InterstellarUAP A very high-order intelligence could handle time paradoxes & free will in simulated universe by embedding causal consistency into its design, using probabilistic & emergent decision-making, possibly operating in a meta-temporal framework that transcends the simulation’s own time.
@InterstellarUAP @threadreaderapp please unroll in case it gets de-linked or shadow banned
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
