Reminder: the SPLC raises money by claiming it exists to "dismantle white supremacy," but DOJ says the SPLC was actually propping up the hate it told donors it aimed to destroy. SPLC paid "field sources," whom SPLC says were merely informants.
🧵2/20
Yet the field sources used the SPLC's $ to:
1⃣Attend extremist rallies
2⃣Host rallies
3⃣Grow existing chapters
4⃣Create new chapters
5⃣Recruit individuals
6⃣Donate to extremist leaders
7⃣Purchase cross-burning material
8⃣Create racist paraphernalia
9⃣Pay living expenses
🧵3/20
The SPLC set up ficitious entities to fund these "field sources."
🧵4/20
1⃣NATIONAL ALLIANCE
SPLC paid over $1.2M to "F-9," who was in a romantic relationship with an SPLC employee😲
While receiving SPLC donors' money, F-9 also raised funds for the National Alliance.
🧵5/20
2⃣NAZI-KKK LEADER
SPLC paid more than $70K to F-30, a NAZI, KKK, and Aryan Nations leader. F-30 asked SPLC to help him/her leave the movement. SPLC gave F-30 a salary to stay. F-30 used the $ to host extremist rallies, recruit members, publish material.
🧵6/20
3⃣KKK GETS COLD FEET
F-30 wasn't the only one. F-31 & F-32, KKK members, wanted out in 2010.
The SPLC bribed them to stay in the movement. These Fs used the $ to attend extremist rallies and to gain a leadership role.
SPLC reimbursed them for cross-burning materials.
🧵7/20
4⃣NEO-NAZI FEATURED
SPLC gave $155K+ to F-42, former chairman of the Neo-Nazi National Alliance. At the same time, SPLC featured this field source on its "Extremist File" webpage.
🧵8/20
5⃣UNITE THE RIGHT
F-37, a member of the leadership chat for the Charlottesville rally in 2017, made racist posts under an SPLC employee's supervision and arranged transport for others to attend the rally. SPLC paid this person $300K.
🧵9/20
6⃣NAZI
The SPLC paid $350K to an officer of the National Socialist Movement and Aryan Nations-affiliated Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club.
🧵10/20
7⃣AMERICAN FRONT
The SPLC paid F-43 $19K. This person was national president of American Front, and is a convicted felon for participating in a cross burning.
🧵11/20
8⃣UNITED KLANS OF AMERICA
The SPLC paid F-18, who led "a millennial reboot of what was once a serious domestic threat."
🧵12/20
WIRE FRAUD
The indictment mentions specific payments SPLC allegedly made under false pretenses. The indictment claims SPLC aimed "to obtain money via donations through materially false representations and omissions about what the donated funds would be used for."
🧵13/20
The indictment also brings bank fraud charges, mentioning specific statements an SPLC employee made to a bank that later conflicted with the SPLC CEO's statements to the bank.
🧵14/20
Finally, the indictment claims the SPLC conspired to commit concealement money laundering, aiming to conceal "the true nature, source, ownership, and control of fraudulently obtained donated money the SPLC paid to the Fs."
🧵15/20
The indictment states that, upon conviction of the wire fraud counts, the SPLC "shall forfeit to the United States... any property, real or personal, which represents or istraceable to the gross receipts obtained" in violation of the law.
🧵16/20
Upon conviction of the conspiracy to conceal money laundering charge, the SPLC shall also forfeit any property involved in that offense.
🧵17/20
I've repeatedly explained why the charges in the indictment make sense. The SPLC built its reputation by suing the KKK into bankruptcy, but now it smears mainstream conservatives and Christians, juicing the numbers on the "hate" it claims to oppose.
🧵18/20
Here's my testimony on the issue before @JudiciaryGOP last month.
After pressure from @IWPCapital & @ADFLegal, DoorDash has taken steps to allow employees to contribute to conservatives unfairly smeared as "hate groups."
ADF's Noah Nash told me that it "sets an excellent example for other companies to follow."
🧵2/10
How does it work? DoorDash uses a platform called Deed to help connect DoorDash employees to nonprofits. Deed, like the company Benevity, facilitates employee giving and volunteering—an important service. Unfortunately, Deed uses the SPLC to "screen" nonprofits.
The SPLC moved to dismiss the DOJ indictment for "vindictive prosecution," claiming that the Trump admin was targeting the leftist group for its free speech.
Here's why that doesn't work, according to the DOJ.
First, a motion to dismiss for vindictive prosecution often occurs when the government files a new indictment in an existing legal case. That's not the case here. "At bottom, this is a standard white collar fraud prosecution."
🧵2/12
The cases the SPLC cites in its own defense actually cut against its argument.
"The defendant does not even allege facts that would fit a recognized claim of vindictive prosecution."
How does corporate America blacklist conservatives? Companies don't do it outright. Instead, they outsource it: to the very same leftist "hate watchdog" that allegedly paid for KKK hoods and cross burnings😲
Meet Benevity. This software companies connects nearly 1K companies to 513K nonprofits, managing $16B in grants and 99M employee volunteer hours. It's the middleman between companies and the charities they voluntarily support.
🧵2/16
But Benevity also systematically excludes mainstream conservative and Christian nonprofits. Its former CO bragged about using the Southern Poverty Law Center's "hate list" to "vet" nonprofits.
Today, Society for the Rule of Law moved to file an amicus brief in U.S. v. SPLC, suggesting the DOJ engaged in vindictive prosecution. I can't help but wonder, what sort of conservative group takes the SPLC's side?
🧵1/15
The society claims it wants to protect prosecution from "political influence." The group says it "has not always concurred with" the SPLC's rhetoric, action, or tactics, but "opposes vindictive prosecution of any target."
🧵2/15
The society notes: @FBIDirectorKash condemned the SPLC as a "partisan smear machine" (it is), @Jim_Jordan asked the AG to examine the SPLC's influence under Biden, Pam Bondi was fired reportedly in part for not being aggressive enough, and Trump attacked SPLC.
What if I told you an EPA lawyer who is also a union leader signed a document explicitly stating that she is "opposing this administration’s policies," but still seems to have kept her job?
On June 30, 2025, Cantello signed a "Declaration of Dissent," condemning the Trump "administration’s focus on harmful deregulation, mischaracterization of previous EPA actions, and disregard for scientific expertise."
🧵2/5
As a citizen, she has every right to take this stand. But as an executive branch employee, she needs to follow lawful orders from the president on down.
This mentality captures the essence of the deep state—opposition to the president's agenda from within the gov't.
The SPLC, which now faces a federal indictment for allegedly funding members of the hate groups it claims it exists to oppose, is once again attacking @donoharm for the sin of disagreeing with the SPLC's transgender and CRT agenda.
🧵1/6
SPLC is trying to shame Google into blacklisting Do No Harm from its grants program (available to most 501(c)(3) nonprofits). The SPLC demonizes "'detransitioner' rehtoric" as if people like @ChloeCole are not real victims of "gender-affirming care."
🧵2/6
But it gets worse! @DoNoHarm rightly opposes CRT in medicine, but the SPLC claims its efforts are rooted in "white supremacist conspiracy theories." Do No Harm is concerned about high standards in medicine, but the SPLC claims it's only about "white people's health."