Generic “support our troops” emails go straight to the trash. Be surgical:
Call, don’t email. Staffers log calls. Emails get auto-replied. A flood of calls on one issue gets flagged to the member within hours.
What to demand:
- Full funding for the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Forces. These are the teams that ran the Kansas-California op. They’re not DEI seminars. They’re not “community outreach.” They’re armed agents and analysts hunting actual terrorists. Fund them.
- No weakening of FISA Section 702. This is the authority that lets the FBI monitor foreign terrorist communications with domestic contacts. Without it, the anonymous tip in this case goes nowhere. Every reauthorization fight, the civil liberties absolutists try to gut it. Tell your reps: protect the tool that protects us.
- Ask your member directly: “Do you support the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division maintaining its current operational tempo under Director Patel? Can I get a yes or no?”
Who to target: Your own reps first — they care about their own constituents. Then the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, the Intelligence Committees, and the Homeland Security Committees. Those members control the purse strings and the oversight.
3/12
🕵️ 2. KNOW YOUR LOCAL FBI FIELD OFFICE
Every FBI field office has a Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) and a tip line. Save the number for yours. Not to play amateur spy — to actually report if you see something.
What to report:
- Pro-ISIS or pro-jihadist content on public social media, Discord servers, Telegram channels
- Individuals expressing a desire to travel overseas to fight
- Anyone attempting to purchase weapons components, drone parts, or explosives precursors with no legitimate explanation
- Sudden radical shifts in behavior, especially combined with isolation and obsessive online activity
What NOT to do: Don’t confront the person. Don’t play hero. Don’t post about it on social media. Call the tip line, give the facts, let the professionals work.
The Kansas case started with one anonymous tip in March 2025. One person saw something online and reported it. That tip led to three arrests, a dismantled ISIS funding pipeline, and potentially dozens of American lives saved. One call.
4/12
👁️ 3. AUDIT YOUR OWN COMMUNITY
You don’t need a badge to pay attention:
- What mosques or Islamic centers are in your area? Who runs them? What’s their leadership’s public record on terrorism, sharia law, or jihadist ideology? Most are perfectly fine. Some aren’t. Know which is which.
- What’s being preached? Sermons in Arabic or Urdu that the congregation doesn’t understand are a known vector for radical messaging. If the imam says one thing in English and something else entirely in Arabic, that’s a problem.
- Are there new arrivals — refugees, asylum claimants, visa holders — from known conflict zones integrating normally, or forming insular clusters with no apparent employment, schooling, or community engagement? Isolation breeds radicalization.
- What’s happening in your local schools? Are students being exposed to “decolonial” or “resistance” curricula that frame America as an irredeemable oppressor? That’s not the same as ISIS recruitment, but it’s the ideological topsoil in which anti-American sentiment grows.
You’re not surveilling your neighbors. You’re being situationally aware of your own community instead of outsourcing that awareness to institutions that may or may not be paying attention.
5/12
🛡️ 4. HARDEN YOUR SOFT TARGETS
ISIS and its copycats don’t hit Fort Bragg. They hit concerts, malls, marathons, nightclubs, and churches. Soft targets. Crowded places. Symbolic dates.
Practical steps:
- Get medical training. Stop the Bleed courses are free or cheap and take a few hours. Tourniquets, wound packing, chest seals. If a bomb goes off or a truck plows through a crowd, the people who save lives in the first three minutes aren’t paramedics — they’re bystanders with training.
- Carry an IFAK (Individual First Aid Kit) in your car. Not a boo-boo kit. A real trauma kit with a CAT tourniquet, hemostatic gauze, and a chest seal. Learn how to use it.
- Know your exits. When you walk into a crowded venue, find two exits. It takes five seconds. Most people freeze in an emergency because they never did this basic mental prep.
- If you carry, train. A concealed firearm you shoot twice a year at a static paper target isn’t a self-defense tool — it’s a liability. Dynamic training, stress inoculation, shoot/no-shoot scenarios. If you’re not training, you’re LARPing.
6/12
💻 5. LEARN THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD
These three were radicalized on Discord, encrypted messaging apps, and social media groups. The digital ecosystem is the recruitment pipeline:
- Understand how algorithms radicalize. YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram recommendation engines push users toward increasingly extreme content because engagement spikes at the fringes. A kid watching military history videos can be algorithmically funneled to jihadist propaganda within weeks. Know the pipeline so you can recognize it.
- Monitor what your kids are on. Not spying. Parenting. Discord servers, Telegram groups, gaming chat channels. If your teenager is suddenly using encrypted apps you’ve never heard of, find out why.
- Learn basic OSINT (Open Source Intelligence). You don’t need a security clearance to find publicly posted extremist content. Reverse image search, username cross-referencing, and platform metadata are all freely available tools. There are free OSINT courses online. Take one.
7/12
🗳️ 6. VOTE LIKE NATIONAL SECURITY DEPENDS ON IT — BECAUSE IT DOES
Not just presidential elections. Midterms. Primaries. Local races for sheriff and prosecutor.
Questions to ask every candidate:
- “What’s your position on FISA Section 702 reauthorization?”
- “Do you support maintaining or increasing funding for the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division?”
- “Should border security funding be tied to counterterrorism appropriations?”
- “What’s your plan for addressing homegrown radicalization on social media platforms?”
If they can’t answer these coherently, they’re not serious about national security. Vote accordingly.
Primary the weak ones. The soft-on-terror caucus I laid out earlier doesn’t lose general elections in safe districts — they lose primaries. Or they would, if people showed up. Midterm primary turnout is abysmal. A few thousand motivated voters can unseat a decade-long incumbent. Be one of them.
8/12
👥 7. BUILD REAL COMMUNITY
This sounds soft. It’s not. The single best defense against radicalization is belonging.
Young men in their 20s — exactly the demographic of these three — are the most vulnerable to extremist recruitment when they’re isolated, purposeless, and disconnected. The ISIS recruiter offers them identity, mission, and brotherhood. The solution isn’t just FBI surveillance. It’s giving young men something better to belong to.
Concrete moves:
- Mentor a young man. Formal programs like Big Brothers or informal. Doesn’t matter. A 21-year-old with a mentor and a purpose doesn’t pledge allegiance to ISIS.
- Support veterans’ organizations that actually reintegrate service members — not the ones that just throw barbecues and slap bumper stickers on trucks. Groups that provide employment, mental health support, and a continued mission.
- Build local networks. Church groups, sports leagues, hunting clubs, martial arts gyms, and volunteer fire departments. The intermediary institutions that once bound communities together before everyone retreated into screens. These aren’t nostalgic throwbacks — they’re inoculation against the atomization that makes radicalization possible.
- Check on the quiet ones. The guy at work who never talks. The neighbor who’s always alone. The kid in your extended family who’s retreated into his room and his computer. Isolation is the pre-existing condition. Community is the treatment.
9/12
📢 8. CONTROL THE NARRATIVE
The media will memory-hole this story within a week. They’ll pivot back to whatever culture-war nonsense keeps the outrage machine running. Don’t let them.
- Share the facts. Not conspiracy theories. The actual DOJ complaint. The actual quotes. “I wish I could kill 300,000,000 Americans” is not a dog whistle — it’s a bullhorn. Make people hear it.
- Challenge the “Islamophobia” deflection. Every time a jihadist plot is busted, the same voices rush to say “don’t stigmatize the community.” The community’s problem isn’t stigma — it’s that three of its young men were wiring money to ISIS. Responsible Muslim leaders should be the loudest voices condemning this. Amplify the ones who do. Ignore the ones who don’t.
- Connect the dots. Border security, counterterrorism funding, surveillance authorities, military readiness — these aren’t separate issues. They’re one integrated system. When politicians weaken any piece of it, they weaken the whole thing. Make that connection explicit in every conversation.
10/12
🔥 9. THE UNCOMFORTABLE CONVERSATION
This one’s for the dinner table, not the ballot box:
If you have family or friends who reflexively oppose every national security measure as “fascist,” who call ICE “Gestapo,” who frame every terrorist attack as blowback for American foreign policy — have the argument. Not the screaming match. The argument.
Ask them:
- “What should the FBI have done differently with these three? Wait until the RPGs were actually fired?”
- “If border security is racist, how do you propose we stop foreign terrorists from entering the country?”
- “You say surveillance authorities are Orwellian. How do you catch a Discord jihadist cell without them?”
Most people who hold these positions have never been forced to articulate an alternative. They just know what they’re against. Make them say what they’re for. The silence is usually instructive.
11/12
🧬 10. THE LONG GAME: RAISE KIDS WHO WOULDN'T DO THIS
These three were someone’s sons. Shamsaldeen’s mother, according to the complaint, encouraged her children to grow up and kill Americans. That’s not a law enforcement failure. That’s a civilization-level parental failure.
- Raise your kids with loyalty to something higher than themselves. Country. Faith. Family. Something that makes “I pledge allegiance to ISIS” unthinkable because they already have an allegiance that fills that space.
- Teach them what America actually is. Not the sanitized textbook version or the “America is irredeemably evil” version — the real, complicated, extraordinary thing. The Constitution. The Bill of Rights. The men who died at Gettysburg, Normandy, and Fallujah. If they don’t know what they’d be betraying, betrayal costs nothing.
- Limit screen time. Radicalization happens through screens. Period. The less time your kid spends in algorithm-driven digital spaces, the less surface area there is for recruitment.
- Give them responsibility early. Work. Service. Competence. A 21-year-old who’s never been given real responsibility is a 21-year-old searching for meaning in all the wrong places.
12/12
🎯 THE BOTTOM LINE
The FBI can’t do this alone. The DOJ can’t prosecute its way out of ideological rot. The military can’t kill an idea with drones.
The defense of this country against jihadist terrorism — and against any ideology that wants to destroy it — requires a layered defense: intelligence agencies on the front end, law enforcement on the interdiction, and a population that’s aware, prepared, and unwilling to be gaslit into complacency.
The three guys in Kansas and California got caught because one person saw something and said something, and the institutions actually worked. Next time, the institutions might not. The question is whether regular Americans are ready to be the next line of defense.
Are you? 🇺🇸
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The video is pure political theater, and yet it’s also the most honest exchange between a president and the press in living memory.
Donald Trump, mid-interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker, decides he’s done. Not with a polite handshake and a “thank you for your time.” Done the way a man walks out of a restaurant when he spots a rat in the kitchen.
The exchange, frame by frame:
Trump locks eyes with Welker. No looking away. No diplomatic deflections. He tells her directly — you’re a liar. Not the network. Not “some people say.” Her. To her face. On HER set. 👏
“The elections are like a third-world country. YOU’RE CROOKED... let’s call it quits. I’ve HAD ENOUGH.”
Welker protests. She traveled all the way to Wisconsin, she pleads. As if geography entitles her to endless deference.
Trump’s response is the kill shot:
“I’ve sat in the rain with you for an hour. I’ve given you enough time. You ought to straighten out your press. A country can never be great with a dishonest press. Let’s GO.”
3/6
Why This Resonates Beyond the Base
This isn’t just another Trump vs. media spat. This is something rarer: a president publicly naming the structural rot instead of playing the access-journalism game.
The press corps operates on a simple principle — they ask the questions, you answer them, and they decide what the narrative is. That’s the unspoken contract of every White House press briefing, every sit-down interview, every “exclusive.” The politician defers to the journalist’s framing and, in exchange, gets a semi-fair edit.
Trump just tore up that contract on camera.
What he’s articulating — however bluntly — is the central insight of media criticism from Chomsky’s Manufacturing Consent to the present: the press doesn’t merely report on power; it is power. And that power is wielded through selective framing, narrative gatekeeping, and the pretense of objectivity while advancing a very specific agenda.
When he says “a country can never be great with a dishonest press,” he’s making an argument that would have been uncontroversial in Thomas Jefferson’s day. Jefferson wrote to John Norvell in 1807: “The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
Three American citizens in their 20s. Not poor. Not refugees. Not imported from a war zone. One apparently served in the U.S. Navy. How do you go from being a kid in Leawood, Kansas, or Lakeside, California, to wiring money to ISIS and wanting your name on an RPG?
- What were they consuming online? Discord servers, Telegram channels, specific imams or influencers? Any connection to Five Eyes (FVEY)?
- What role did isolation, pornography addiction, video game addiction, or other psychological vulnerabilities play in making them susceptible?
- Did any of them pass through the mental health system? Were any of them on psychiatric medications? We know SSRIs can produce emotional blunting and detachment from reality — was that a factor?
- What was the actual content of the “pro-ISIS social media group” that brought them together? Who ran it? Is it still up?
The DOJ complaint gives us the what. It doesn’t give us the why. And if you don’t understand the why, you’re not stopping the next three.
3/12
💰 2. WHY ONLY $2,000?
This is the detail that should be raising eyebrows. The FBI says these guys collectively sent “over $2,000” over more than a year of plotting. That’s nothing. That’s a used Honda Civic. That’s less than the average American’s monthly rent.
- Were these guys broke, incompetent, or both?
- Or is the $2,000 figure only what the FBI can prove — and the real question is what else was flowing through channels they didn’t catch?
- Ghafoor handed $250 cash in a wax-sealed envelope. Shamsaldeen drove 90 miles to a crypto ATM. These are comically amateur operational security moves. Is ISIS recruiting idiots now, or were these low-level foot soldiers while bigger fish swim free?
- Who was the real money supposed to go to? The FBI undercover intercepted it — but where was the actual ISIS pipeline these guys thought they were funding?
If the FBI’s counterterrorism operation netted three dudes and $2,000 while the actual networks remain intact, that’s not a victory — that’s a press release.
Should have listened to Mike Rowe or Charlie Kirk...
🔬 The STEM Employment Paradox: 12 Million Degree-Holders Without Work
This is one of the great bait-and-switches of the modern economy. Let’s unpack what’s actually happening.
2/6
📊 The Scale of the Problem
12 million unemployed or underemployed STEM graduates isn’t just a statistic—it's an indictment. We were told for decades: “Get a STEM degree, the jobs are endless, you’ll be set for life.” Students took on massive debt, grinded through brutal coursework, and emerged into... nothing.
The conventional narrative blames a “skills gap.” That’s a convenient fiction.
3/6
🎯 What’s Actually Going On
1. The H-1B Visa Firehose
The tech industry’s preferred labor strategy isn’t developing domestic talent—it’s importing it cheaper. H-1B visa holders are tied to their sponsoring employer, meaning they can’t easily leave for better pay. This creates a captive workforce that suppresses wages across the board. Companies lobby for more visas while simultaneously conducting mass layoffs. The contradiction is only a contradiction if you believe their stated reasons rather than their revealed preferences.
The mechanism is straightforward: flood the labor supply, depress wages, increase dependency. A domestic STEM graduate with market-rate salary expectations and geographic preferences is a problem. An H-1B holder who’ll work for 30% less and can’t leave without risking deportation is a solution—for the employer.
2. Offshoring & Remote Arbitrage
Why hire an American engineer at $120k when you can hire three in Bangalore at $40k each? The pandemic “proved” remote work works, and corporations took notes. The jobs aren’t just going to immigrants here—they’re going to workers who never set foot in the country.
3. The Credential Inflation Trap
A bachelor’s in computer science was once enough. Then you needed a master’s. Now, entry-level positions demand 3-5 years of experience, plus a portfolio of side projects, plus LeetCode grinding that has nothing to do with the actual job. The goalposts keep moving because the labor surplus lets employers be arbitrarily selective.
4. The “STEM Shortage” Was Always a Lobbying Construct
The alleged STEM labor shortage was manufactured by industry groups—most notably the tech lobby—to justify expanding guest worker programs. Multiple analyses have shown that the U.S. produces more STEM graduates than there are STEM job openings each year. The “shortage” is a shortage of workers willing to accept suppressed wages, not a shortage of qualified people.
Let’s get into it. This is a sprawling topic, and the Henry Nowak case is the flashpoint that’s finally forcing the conversation into the open. I’ll trace the ideological lineage, name the architects, walk through what happened to that kid in Southampton, and lay out what actually stops this.
📜 The Ideological Architecture: Where Anti-White Rhetoric Comes From
Anti-white rhetoric isn’t some organic grassroots sentiment that bubbled up from the streets. It was built. Deliberately. In law schools and humanities departments, over decades, by specific people with a specific framework.
The intellectual genealogy runs through three fused traditions:
3/17
🏛️ The Frankfurt School and Critical Theory
The root system starts with the Frankfurt School in 1920s Germany — Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, and others at the Institute for Social Research. They took Marx’s class analysis and, realizing the proletarian revolution wasn’t coming to the West, pivoted. Instead of economics, they targeted culture. The oppression narrative shifted from bourgeoisie vs. proletariat to a more flexible framework: society is structured by dominant groups oppressing marginalized groups through cultural hegemony.
This is the crucial mutation. Marxism 1.0 said, “Workers of the world unite.” Critical Theory said, “the entire Western cultural apparatus — language, law, art, family structure, science — is a system of domination.” And the dominant group in the West? White people. Europeans. The inheritors of the Enlightenment.
GPS—I know exactly who Spielberg has been meeting with since 2017, think Five Eyes (FVEY), after a New York Times article on the Pentagon’s UFO program (“Glowing Auras and ‘Black Money’”). Including trips to Germany, Brussels, Italy, the UK, and France.
The story was written by Spielberg, and the screenplay was written by longtime collaborator David Koepp.
🎬 The Spielberg Psyop: Deconstructing Disclosure Day
Let’s cut through the marketing fog. Disclosure Day, releasing June 12, 2026, isn’t some innocent return to Close Encounters nostalgia. This is a $115 million narrative weapon, and the target is far more specific than “entertainment.”
2/7
🔭 The Setup: What We’re Actually Watching
The plot skeleton is straightforward enough: Emily Blunt plays a Kansas City meteorologist whose live broadcast is hijacked—she becomes an involuntary conduit, speaking in tongues on air, relaying messages from something non-human. Josh O’Connor plays a whistleblower named Daniel Kellner who’s stolen classified data proving extraterrestrial contact. Colin Firth is the corporate/government antagonist trying to suppress disclosure. The central conflict: does the truth get released to all eight billion people simultaneously, or does it stay controlled by institutions?
Spielberg himself said it at CinemaCon: this film is “more truth than fiction.” Not speculation. He told audiences to bring a seatbelt. The screenwriter, David Koepp, went through 42 drafts—the most of his entire career, including Jurassic Park and War of the Worlds. You don’t do 42 drafts for a popcorn flick.
3/7
🎯 The Psychological Operation: Soft Disclosure and Ontological Conditioning
This is the core of what’s happening. The film functions on multiple levels simultaneously.
Level 1: Predictive Programming
Hollywood has always been the CIA’s preferred delivery mechanism for acclimating the public to paradigm shifts. Before the public accepts a new reality, they need to have already imagined it through fiction. This is basic psychological operations doctrine—reduce the shock of revelation by pre-exposing the population to the concept in a controlled, emotionally-managed format.
The timing is not subtle. The film arrives after:
- Congressional UAP hearings with whistleblowers testifying about “non-human biologics”
- Pentagon officials using the word “disclosure” in official briefings
- The documentary Age of Disclosure (directed by Dan Farah, who worked with Spielberg on Ready Player One) breaking streaming records on Amazon Prime within 48 hours
As X user @MarioNawfal noted: “Is this entertainment, or the first step in preparing the public for ontological shock?” It’s both. That’s the point.
Level 2: The Agnosticism Trap
Koepp explicitly laid out the theological agenda in his MovieMaker interview. He compared belief in aliens directly to belief in God, then declared: “the only reasonable position is agnostic.”
This isn’t casual musing. This is the philosophical payload. The film positions uncertainty as virtue and conviction as arrogance. By equating extraterrestrial intelligence with divine intelligence, the movie creates a framework where:
- Belief in God becomes equivalent to belief in aliens—both are “unseen entities”
- Religious faith is reframed as one possible interpretation among many
- The “reasonable” position is to admit you don’t know anything for certain
This is epistemological sabotage dressed as open-mindedness.
THREAD: My wife, Yolanda, is fighting for her life. We need your help. 🧵
Over five years. Stage 4 colon cancer. Metastasized to her liver. Now her lungs.
Over 100 rounds of chemotherapy. Five surgeries — including a brutal 10-hour operation and a 3 am emergency surgery at 3 am (last September), where a trauma surgeon gave her a 70% chance of never leaving the table.
She proved them wrong.
But the chemo stopped working. Tumors progressed. So now she's on immunotherapy — nivolumab + ipilimumab, every three weeks. Fourth and final induction round hits June 4th.
The lung lesions are small. They should respond. We're holding onto that.
Here's what they don't tell you about cancer: the financial destruction.
Four vehicles gone. Two watercraft. The RV. Our beach house.
Banks slashed our lines of credit by over $800,000 the moment they caught wind of our situation. 820 credit score.