The Trump Administration just declared the EEOC’s disparate-impact regime unconstitutional.
Disparate impact forced employers to trade neutral standards for racial quotas.
This is a direct strike on one of the Left’s favorite tools for forcing racial outcomes through law.
For decades, disparate impact let our managerial elite treat neutral standards as suspect if they produced the “wrong” racial numbers.
It banned things like background checks, aptitude tests, knowledge exams, hiring screens, and merit-based selection.
That regime is over.
OLC’s conclusion is clear: EEOC’s Title VII guidelines are unconstitutional because they impose liability based on disparate outcomes alone and pressure employers into race-based decision making.
This gives force to President Trump’s April 23, 2025 Executive Order exposing disparate-impact liability as anti-merit at its core: a regime that treats differences in outcomes between identity groups as proof that neutral standards must be abandoned.
From that Executive Order:
"It is the policy of the United States to eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts to the maximum degree possible to avoid violating the Constitution, Federal civil rights laws, and basic American ideals."
This is what restoring equal protection looks like.
No racial quotas. No federal pressure campaign forcing employers to discriminate in the name of anti-discrimination law.
Civil rights law should mean what Americans were told it meant: equal treatment under law, meritocratic standards, and no racial balancing by bureaucrats.
The era of managerial elites laundering their left-wing nation-building project through disparate impact liability is over.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
According to the Public Interest Legal Foundation, its client is challenging the Illinois Voting Rights Act of 2011’s redistricting mandates under the Fifteenth Amendment and federal Voting Rights Act.
That is exactly the kind of litigation Callais invites.
Illinois did not hide the ball.
When Gov. Pritzker signed the maps, he invoked the Illinois Voting Rights Act and praised redistricting plans designed to preserve “clusters of minority voters” with “collective electoral power.”
Virginia's map just got struck down. Is California next?
California's "mapmaker" drew its new maps to "ensure" that racially gerrymandered "VRA seats are bolstered in order to make them most effective." That's illegal under Callais.
@AAGDhillon: Here's how we can do it. 🧵
California state law requires an "independent" Commission to draw its district maps.
But Newsom and state Legislature Dems overrode the Commission last year to gerrymander.
That meant hiring a "mapmaker"—Paul Mitchell—to do it.
But he drew an illegal racial gerrymander.
Before SCOTUS's recent Callais decision, courts interpreted the VRA to effectively *require* racial quotas in gerrymandering.
As Justice Thomas explained, that was “repugnant to any nation that strives for the ideal of a color-blind Constitution.”
Today—as Chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution—I urged @DAGToddBlanche and @AAGDhillon to act on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais.
DOJ has the power to enforce this decision nationwide and must use it to end illegal racially-gerrymandered districts.
My Subcommittee has oversight responsibility for constitutional rights, civil-rights enforcement, and DOJ's Civil Rights Division.
We are going to use it.
It's time to enforce our laws and our color-blind Constitution. We must undo prior race-based actions.
The Supreme Court has now made clear: "Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act . . . was designed to enforce the Constitution—not collide with it."
That means DOJ cannot keep treating Section 2 as a license to force States to sort Americans into districts by race.