Dennis Noel Kavanagh Profile picture
Jun 9 18 tweets 7 min read Read on X
1/ I went to Parliament to watch the Women and Equalities Committee. The chair of the EHRC Mary-Ann Stephenson (MAS) and CEO John Kirkpatrick were giving evidence, the other adults in the room were Rosie Duffield and Rebecca Paul MP. Other than that it was the slow kid's table. Image
2/ This is the committee chair Sarah Owen MP, she is EXTREMELY fair unless you're Rosie or Sarah when she'll look at Nadia Whittome and mutter. She also thinks intersex means people are neither male or female and didn't like it much when the chair of the EHRC corrected that. Image
3/ So the committee kicks off with about half an hour of the kids table saying it is COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE to ever tell if a bloke is a bloke if he puts a dress on. MAS has to patiently explain people have eyes and seem to be able to work it out. MPs think this is genocide. Image
4/ So this bloke is up first. He is INDIGNANT that women sometimes bring male children/babies into the ladies and implies this shows the Law Lords are a bunch of idiots. MAS is too polite to explain that babies do not represent the same threat level as massive hairy transvestites Image
5/ Then get a GENUIS intervention from Sarah Owen. She says blokes who want to get into the ladies will now claim they are "trans men" (and therefore female in law). This obviously happens all the time and no one has eyes able to correctly sex people so it's a real gotcha. Image
6/ Sensing a killer point, Nadia Whittome questions whether a minister was right to say that people have eyes and will use commons sense to ask blokes to leave the ladies. She says this enforces stereotypes and comes down with a massive case of RAPID ONSET BUTCH LESBIAN CONCERN Image
7/ MAS sneaks in a remark about women and women's rights. This is considered absolutely fucking outrageous by the kid's table at the Women and Equalities Select Committee who quickly return the discussion to sad transvestites and their theory that no one has eyes. Image
8/ This professional Naomi Cunningham impersonator then speaks. She says the fact that women didn't have the vote was once considered common sense and therefore that means no one can ever exercise common sense or use their eyeballs to ask Dave to get the hell out the ladies. Image
9/ So then this weird little gremlin bloke tries his hand at some amateur hour article 8 point. MAS patiently explains the High Court, Supreme Court have considered this and it's a no goer for his side. She also dares to say other people (women) have article 8 rights. Image
10/ This bloke then pipes up saying it's impossible to ever enforce single sex spaces in medicine. Later on in the hearing he complains that the written code of practice is "just words" which is a fair analysis of a written document and a powerful point lol. Image
11/ We then get a comedy interlude from Rachel Taylor who reads out an email from a transvestite truck driver who is worried about showers and is now going to seek a new life in Ireland. This email is MOVING and EMOTIONAL and a fair reason why women should lose all their rights Image
12/ It's a committee of all the talents this one, so who better than Kim "reaper" Leadbetter to moan about the fact the women's institute and girl guiding now, horrifically, do not cater for transvestites. Women have been mentioned about 3 times if that by this point. Image
13/ Rosie Duffield MP then completely kills the vibe and says maybe the Women's and Equality Ctte should consider women. This is outrageous. She doesn't ask a single question focused on the needs of transvestites and appears to suggest the EHRC should educate the kids table. Image
14/ Also ruining the vibe is Rebecca Paul MP, she disgracefully says there are massive blokes in female prisons and then even invites the EHRC to take an interest in it! That Kirkpatrick guy acts like he's only just heard of it but says they will take a look maybe. Image
15/ Then some low energy lib dem says wouldn't it be great if we had associations for two protected characteristics so girlguiding now becomes girls and transvestite guiding. Women barely get a mention as is the tradition of this committee. Image
16/ There's then an assortment of back and forth on various subjects but MAS has warmed to her task and is casually batting off stupid stuff about "policing toilets" and sad transvestites in the fashion of a slightly exhausted by very patient infant school teacher. Image
17/ Overall MAS did a good job and joined Rosie and Rebecca as an adult in the room. She did say something a bit dodgy about the EHRC supporting conversation legislation but basically only if it complies with Cass. We'll be watching that development but overall a good show by her
18/ My abiding impression was that I leave Parliament with many more LOLs in my heart but many more fears about the standard of our MPs. This was silly student politics but it had a half hearted feel. They know they've lost this one and are now whinging on the kid's table.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dennis Noel Kavanagh

Dennis Noel Kavanagh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jebadoo2

Jun 7
1/ When trans activists aren't harassing lesbians, one of their preferred tactics is to silence gay men

One such gay man, Associate Professor Dr. Foran of Keble College, Oxford has just had to cancel a lecture series because some people go to university to shout and not to learn
2/ Associate Professor Foran is one of our foremost legal minds on the subject of sex and gender as it relates to equality law. He has a nationally significant mind and his work has been referenced in the UK Supreme Court by the Law Lords.

3/ He does genuine public good by contributing to legal debates on sex/gender, moreover, you might take the view that him offering free public lectures on the subject in addition to the hours he puts in to public debates on this is an overall good thing

Read 10 tweets
May 29
1/ Yet again, the BBC frame this issue as an emotive plea for personal liberty and understanding. This is legally illiterate and glosses over the fact that trans activists seek the complete destruction of the category of sex in law with all the implications that has. Such as...
2/ Women's prisons. Women's sports. Women's private spaces for the purposes of dignity, safety and security.

This has a knock on effect on gay and lesbian rights. If there's no coherent sex category in law, you can't have the same sex orientation protected characteristic.
3/ It is presently unlawful in Australia for lesbians to meet in taxpayer funded public buildings and many lesbians have gone back to underground secretive arrangements. That is the prospectus Nick is pushing here with his ill informed approach centred on personal liberty.
Read 6 tweets
May 21
1/ Transvestites have finally been told "no" today, and it's at least 10 year overdue. It's no surprise to any of us that the middle class sensibilities of the media want to focus on sad transvestites rather than raped women in shelters or autistic kids given puberty blockers.
2/ This extraordinary movement of men in dresses literally went to the supreme court and tried to render the gay/lesbian protected characteristic "meaningless" in the words of the law lords and ladies. They literally tried to get their rights by taking ours. Image
3/ And that's just the gay right's angle. If they had won, there would be no such thing as female sports, the female prison estate, female only political association, they would have destroyed the legal concept of female. Because, let's be honest, male was never their goal.
Read 11 tweets
May 15
1/ Well, I've skimmed Giggle v Tickle and my conclusion is that the judgment is firmly in the category of being "a bit bloody silly". It is not normal to have Judges using activist language, but this judgment talks about cisgender and sex assigned at birth and the rest of it.... Image
Image
2/ What this case shows is that once you put "gender identity" into legislation you make it unlawful for people not to believe everyone has magic gender souls. That is a pretty extreme outcome and it's clear the case Forstater would have failed in Australia. Image
3/ This is a frankly Orwellian position for the law to be in, here we have Judges ruling that everyone has a magic gender soul and drafting judgments on the basis such a contested fiction is a verifiable fact. That is extremely close to a religious blasphemy ruling. Image
Read 14 tweets
Apr 15
1/ Up until today it was unlawful for lesbians to have a lesbian only meeting in a publicly funded "pride centre" in Oz. That hasn't technically changed today as a matter of law, but the Federal Court has basically just said it bloody better change soon. By way of explainer...
2/ The LAG are up against Australia's EHRC, the Australian Human Rights Commission. What you need to know about the AHRC is that they are gender loons who always prefer the interests of transvestites over the rights of lesbians. All you need to know about LAG is they're tough.
3/ So the story begins with the LAG applying to the AHRC for an "exemption" to an obnoxious piece of law that says lesbians meeting without men is discrimination against transvestites. LAG want such a meeting. AHRC unsurprisingly say no and are judge and jury for that application
Read 18 tweets
Apr 12
1/ I'm getting a bit sick of "anonymous government sources" (ie Bridget Phillipson's SPADs) writing off For Women Scotland as "culture wars". Let us remember the Scottish Government in FWS literally tried to abolish the legal category of sex and sexual orientation.
2/ Had they prevailed, gays and lesbians would have lost the right to single sex associations under the Equality Act, furthermore, gay and lesbian as categories would effectively be rendered "meaningless" in law (to quote the law lords).

3/ That in turn would have seriously adversely affected any protected characteristic claim we might want to bring effectively turning any direct discrimination case into a much more complex indirect discrimination case. That's a pretty bold assault on gay and lesbian rights.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(