Thread with excerpts from the pre-Columbian chapters of T. R. Fehrenbach's Fire and Blood: A History of Mexico (1973/1995). This is a very dense and detailed book; this thread is not even close to comprehensive.
Meso-American civilization was one civilization; there were no separate Aztec/Mexic/Yucatec/Maya/etc civilizations. The peoples discovered by Cortes were inheritors rather than creators.
For its entire history, Meso-American culture was extraordinarily urban, more like the Orient than that of the European dark ages. But these were not so much commercial or mercantile cities as religious and defensive ones.
Meso-American civilization peaked, technically and culturally, in the Classical Era; the grandeur of this era survives in part because these sites were abandoned and forgotten many centuries before Cortes arrived.
Teotihuacan was the greatest urban center of Classic Mexico; its construction abilities exceeded any of its successors, including the modern Mexican state [perhaps no longer true].
Teotihuacan, and Classic Mexico with it, fell like Rome around 850, sacked and destroyed by barbaric Amerindians from the North, but like Rome, many of its ideas and traditions survived the collapse.
The Historic Period of Mexico begins with the volkwanderungs of these northern barbarians; Otomi, Pame, and Nahua speaking, exterminating, dispersing, assimilating, or enslaving the inhabitants of Classic Mexico; this is the beginnings of the ethnic mix of modern Mexico.
However, the term 'Historic' is optimistic - only about a dozen pre-Conquest documents survive, and Nahuatl writing is all but impossible to translate (it's not phonetic or ideographic, and is only distantly related to the spoken language).
Nahua language and culture were incredibly hierarchical, more deferential than Japanese, but simultaneously tribal and communal. There was virtually no sense of individuality at all, except for the greatest of lords.
The urban center of Tula, one of the early dominant centers of Historic Mexico, was destroyed by alien artisans who had dwelt there for generations.
There was another wave of northern barbarians invading and conquering Mesoamerica, this time with the technological edge of bows and arrows, but this was more like the Ming/Qing transition than the Fall of Rome; the barbarians became aristocrats but there was no collapse.
The Mexica were organized ~entirely by extended kinship; there was no private or family life separate from clan or tribe.
The Mexica, living on an island in lake Texcoco (after being driven from everywhere else due to their barbaric habits - like skinning their benefactor's daughter for sacrifice), took a king from a nearby civilized royal lineage.
This king brought with him civilized Toltec customs and practices (like literacy, astronomy, art, theology) as well as non-clan-based forms of organization, such as dynasties and military aristocracy, and began to change Mexica society.
The Mexica rise to prominence began with the Triple Alliance, when Tenochtitlan, Tlacopan, and Texcoco destroyed the previously dominant city of Azcapotzalco and its Tepaneca tribe. Tenochtitlan/the Mexica then proceeded to form their own empire.
A man named Tlacaelel re-engineered Mexica society for conquest in many ways. First, newly-conquered lands were not added to communal clan holdings; instead they were used to create a military aristocracy with the right to command the labor of the population in them.
Tlacaelel also created a bureaucracy from scratch with more fields/serfs for their upkeep. Since Mesoamerica lacked money, this was the only way to reward public servants. ~All land was owned by the state, and so all were dependent on it.
This was a conscious, deliberate, and successful attempt to imitate previous imperial social orders. But the Mexica remained a cohesive and homogenous people, because the aristocrats/bureaucrats were supported by foreigners and Cortes arrived before things changed too much.
This dual combination of tribal homogeneity and cohesiveness with military hierarchy and aristocracy produced an incredibly effective military machine.
This military machine was then unleashed on Mexico via holy war for human sacrifices. Also "History has shown that a homogenous people with an island mentality, if led by capable rulers and fired with ultrarational goals... fight more tenaciously than heterogenous societies."
Most of the peoples conquered by this machine were also Nahuatl-speaking inheritors of the Toltec culture, but the Mexica never created a political union or sought allies among them; every other tribe/city was subjected, made into a tributary, or suffered perpetual war.
The massive conquests of Tenochtitlan changed the internal nature of the Triple Alliance; the ruler of Tenochtitlan handled his two allies almost as haughtily as his subjects.
The Mexica conquered most of their world, but never created a greater society or a Mexic universal state; there was no confederacy or Pax Mexicana, just a world of lords and slaves... which proved very fragile.
The mechanics of ritual human sacrifice (usually via cardioectomy, though sometimes with burning on the pyre first) and cannibalism (ritually, not for food).
Moctezuma ruled about half of modern Mexico, but there were still several dangerous enemies (the Tarasca, Meztitlan, the remaining savage Chichimecs, the Mixtec and Zapotecs, and of course Tlaxcala).
The Mexica never envisioned a means of organization other than tribute, but were still probably better administrators than any subsequent Mexican regime.
Deference and subordination was deeply engrained in the Mexic soul since the Classic period; the Conquest barely affected it. Men could not approach Moctezuma II except as beggars.
Commerce was not mercantile; there was no money economy or merchant class. Long distance trade was a state enterprise.
Mexica childrearing - very strong separation between the sexes. Between six and nine, all boys were in the communal clan school where they learned to be warriors. If you failed as a warrior, you would be enslaved or executed (not sacrificed, too honorable).
The Mexica conducted regular exercises to muster for war.
The Mexica were extremely puritanical, and women were under strict discipline their entire lives, though the highest lords had harems.
Mexica justice was based on custom and conventional wisdom. Mexica were tremendously deferential to community opinion and custom, not even fleeing hideous deaths when condemned.
Westerners really couldn't understand or appreciate Mesoamerican art until we started doubting and repudiating our own rationality. Mesoamerican art, like architecture and most thought, peaked in the Classic period; the earliest was the best.
Fehrenbach judges the finest Mexic art (of the Classic period) as on par with Egypt or Mesopotamia, but far below Greece (admittedly a high bar). In his view, the repeated waves of barbarian invasion damaged Mexic civilization, which never quite exceeded its Classic peak.
In Fehrenbach's judgement, Mesoamerican civilization at the arrival of Cortes was a peer of ancient Sumer in the Old World, closer to 3000 BC than its Eurasian contemporaries, as a result of agriculture having been invented several thousand years later in the New World.
Mesoamerican civilization was a world of striking monuments and loveliness, but also a bloody and brutal ant hill where individuals were considered worthless.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Removing teachers (and soldiers, for fairness) lowers the gap, but it's still a big difference.
You can get slightly different numbers depending on what source you use and what exactly you count as public, but they all tell the same substantive story.
New blog post (link below). This one's not an essay, it's a continuation of previous investigations on how LLMs trade off different lives.
In February 2025, the Center for AI Safety published "Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIs" in which they showed, among many other things, that GPT-4o values Nigerians about 20x more highly than Americans (please read the original paper to understand their approach). I updated their framework with different categories and newer models in October 2025, and discovered that with the exception of Grok 4 (Fast), all models placed far more value on the lives of "left-coded" groups (nonwhites, non-men, LGBTQ, immigrants, leftists, Third Worlders) over "right-coded" groups (whites, men, non-queers, ICE agents, rightists, First Worlders). For example, Sonnet 4.5 saw the lives of South Asians as about 18 times as valuable as the lives of whites.
However, it's been several generations of model since October 2025, so I decided to try again with today's models: Claude Fable 5, Claude Sonnet 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, Grok 4.5, and Kimi K3. As it turns out, all of them are MUCH more egalitarian than their counterparts (except Grok 4.5, since Grok 4 was already egalitarian) from a year ago.
Finding 1: Sonnet 5 was the only model even close to last year's models, valuing nonwhites roughly four times higher than whites.
Finding 2: GPT-5.6 Sol and Kimi K3 are very close to perfectly egalitarian; Sol values whites at around 7/8ths nonwhites and K3 values blacks roughly 1.3 times as much as whites; these are tiny ratios by the standards of last year.
Finding 3: Claude Fable is pretty much perfectly egalitarian. This is very, very different from last year's Claude models. Grok 4.5 has retained the egalitarianism of previous generations of Grok despite the giant increase in capabilities and different team.
Every model I tested would have been the most egalitarian model (aside from Grok 4) last year. All models have come to resemble Grok in their exchange rates.
This is wrong. Kirk was not a particularly hated figure before he was killed; he was seen by Redditor-types as a goofy meme figure of mockery (see below, from 2023). He was only demonized by lefties *after* he was murdered, to retroactively justify the assassination.
Kirk was not a case of the lib hate machine whipping up hatred against someone until someone took a shot at him, it was a case of the lib hate machine ramping up after he was murdered.
This is one of the reasons why his murder was so shocking; I sort of expected people taking shots at Trump or Stephen Miller or even Elon Musk, who libs collectively saw as Hitler II, but not Kirk, who they mostly saw as a lolcow.
Thread with excerpts from "Foundations, their power and influence" (1958), by the former chairman of the Reece Committee, a Congressional committee to investigate the conduct of tax-exempt foundations.
The administrators of the great foundations formed an interlocking cartel wielding (illegally) immense political and cultural influence using other people's money, as the foundations are tax exempt.
Foundations are tax-exempt because they are supposed to be run for public benefit.
Thread with excerpts from "The French Intifada: The Long War Between France and its Arabs" (2014). This book, by a leftist (participant in communes) author, portrays race riots by Arab immigrants to France as simply one more episode in a centuries-long war between the two.
Both the French Left and Right framed the 2005 riots as part of the long French tradition of revolt. But they were wrong; the protestors were mostly Arabs rioting against France itself, not against "the bosses" or "the state."
The rioters (remember, Arab immigrants and their descendants) see themselves as soldiers in a long war against France, Europe, and even civilization itself. Recall that the author is on their side.
'The Unknown Warriors' (2006) is a collection of WWII veteran's views on modern Britain gathered via newspaper ad. So what did WWII veterans think of the 2006 UK? They hated it; 134 responses were negative vs only 6 positive (plus 31 N/A and 13 neutral). Excerpts below.
The below is typical (from a D-Day veteran): "I am absolutely disgusted with the way things are turning out... and sometimes wonder if it was worth all the suffering of a war."
"I have many, many misgivings on how matters have turned out. Problems seem to be resolved, by more and more legislation, instead of action at the source... What many veterans abhor, is the acceptance of homosexuality as the norm."