Tony Seruga Profile picture
Jun 12 2 tweets 4 min read Read on X
1/2 🧵

🔥 TULSI GABBARD JUST DROPPED THE HAMMER — AND KARY MULLIS WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG

The Man Who Saw It Coming

Was my friend Kary Mullis — Nobel laureate, inventor of PCR, and certified pain in Anthony Fauci's ass — spent his final years pointing his genius-level intellect at something most were too cowardly to touch. He called Fauci "Josef Mengele" to his face.

He warned about gain-of-function research at NIH's Rocky Mountain Laboratories. He connected the dots between Montana, Wuhan, and a network of academic collaborators playing God with coronaviruses thanks to GPS.

They called him crazy. They always do.
Now the receipts are public.

🦇 The Montana-Wuhan Pipeline: Follow the Bats

In 2018, under Fauci's NIAID watch, researchers at Rocky Mountain Laboratories infected 12 Egyptian fruit bats with WIV1 — a coronavirus sourced directly from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Let that sink in. A Wuhan coronavirus. Inside a U.S. government lab. Years before COVID-19.

The bats? Sourced from Catoctin Wildlife Preserve in Maryland. The zoo's director of animal health at the time? A former NIH employee. The revolving door spins so fast it's a damn centrifuge.
Ralph Baric of UNC — Wuhan's longtime research partner — was on the project. The same Ralph Baric whose lab has been at the center of gain-of-function controversy for years.

They published in 2018 claiming the bats didn't develop a "robust infection." Convenient. But the question isn't whether those particular bats got sick.

The question is:

Why the hell were U.S. tax dollars shipping Wuhan coronaviruses into American labs and injecting them into live animals years before a pandemic that shut down the planet?

🎯 Tulsi's Swan Song: The Declassified Report

Tulsi Gabbard just released a declassified intelligence document mapping out an extensive, secret U.S. network behind Ukrainian biolabs conducting gain-of-function research on the world's most dangerous pathogens.

The document lays out multiple TAPs (research projects) targeting:

—. 🦠 Highly pathogenic avian influenza (bird flu — the one with 50%+ human mortality)

— 🐷 African swine fever

—. 🧬 Pathogen genome sequencing inside U.S.-funded biocontainment labs

And here's where it gets really interesting.

🔗 THE SAME NAMES KEEP SHOWING UP

The American universities tied to the Ukrainian biolab network are the exact same institutions embedded in the domestic gain-of-function ecosystem:

View the table below.

That's not a coincidence. That's a network.

🏛️ The Full Cast of Characters

U.S. Government Agencies & Contractors:

•Black & Veatch (major contractor — name appears repeatedly)
•CDC
•USDA
•Metabiota (the same outfit that partnered with EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak)

Additional Partners:

•Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (Germany)
•Orion
•SATOSO
•OIC

Ukrainian Entities: A sprawling web of research institutes, veterinary labs, and universities — all handling pathogens that could end civilization if they escaped.

The document explicitly notes this is a small sampling. The full network is larger.

💀 The Scientific-Industrial Complex Exposed

This isn't a conspiracy. It's institutional architecture.

The pattern is unmistakable:

1. U.S. tax dollars fund the construction of biocontainment labs in foreign countries

2. U.S. universities and contractors staff and operate the research

3. Dangerous pathogens are collected, sequenced, and manipulated

4. Oversight is fragmented across multiple agencies with no single point of accountability

5. When something goes wrong, everyone points fingers at everyone else

It's the same playbook every time. Wuhan. Ukraine. Montana. The names change. The structure doesn't.

x.com/TonySeruga/sta…
x.com/TonySeruga/sta…
Image
2/2

🧠 What Kary Mullis Knew

Mullis didn't need declassified documents. He understood the incentive structure.

Gain-of-function research is scientifically seductive. It's also catastrophically dangerous. But when you combine:

•Tenure-track pressure
•Billions in grant money
•Zero criminal liability
•Revolving doors between regulators and the regulated

...you get exactly what we got: a global network of labs treating pandemic-capable pathogens like Legos, with the rest of humanity as unwilling test subjects.

Mullis called Fauci "Mengele" because he recognized the type. The scientist who believes his intellect places him above moral constraints. The bureaucrat who treats human beings as data points. The functionary who will lie to Congress without breaking a sweat because, in his mind, the mission justifies everything.
x.com/TonySeruga/sta…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tony Seruga

Tony Seruga Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TonySeruga

Jun 14
1/7 ☠️

🧵

I know the Simpsonwood meeting intimately. That video covers exactly what went down, and I can break down the whole sordid affair for you — what happened, who was in the room, what they found, and how they buried it.

Image
2/7

🏛 The Simpsonwood Retreat: June 7-8, 2000

The meeting was held at the Simpsonwood Conference Center in Norcross, Georgia — a quiet, secluded retreat owned by the United Methodist Church. Not exactly the kind of place you'd expect to host one of the most consequential cover-ups in public health history.

Who Was in the Room

- CDC — the National Immunization Program officials, including Dr. Roger Bernier, Dr. Robert Chen, and EIS officer Dr. Thomas Verstraeten
- FDA representatives
- Vaccine manufacturers — GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Wyeth, Aventis Pasteur, and others
- Consultants and epidemiologists from various universities
- World Health Organization reps

Conspicuously absent: no parents, no independent scientists, no public health advocates. Just the people with the most to lose.

What They Had Just Discovered

Dr. Thomas Verstraeten had been crunching data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) — a massive database of HMO medical records covering hundreds of thousands of children. He was specifically looking at thimerosal, the mercury-based preservative in childhood vaccines.

What he found was catastrophic:

- Statistically significant associations between thimerosal exposure and neurodevelopmental disorders
- Increased risks for autism, ADHD, speech delays, and tics
- A dose-response relationship — the more thimerosal a child received, the higher the risk

The VSD data showed relative risks for autism at 2.48 to 7.62, depending on exposure level. These weren't borderline results. They were screaming.
3/7

📜 What the Transcript Reveals

The full meeting was transcribed — 286 pages — and obtained years later via a FOIA request. The transcript is a masterclass in institutional self-preservation.

Key Moments from the Transcript

Dr. Verstraeten's presentation — He laid out the data showing clear signals of harm. At one point, he described the findings as showing a "statistically significant relationship" between thimerosal dose and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Dr. Robert Brent — a paid consultant for vaccine manufacturers — explicitly said:

"The medical-legal findings in this study, causal or not, are horrendous. If an allegation was made that a child's neurobehavioral findings were caused by thimerosal-containing vaccines, you have a very strong plaintiff case."

Translation: We know this data is damning, and the lawyers will eat us alive.

Dr. John Clements of the WHO dropped the mask entirely:

"Perhaps the greatest tragedy of all is that we have immunization programs which are preventing these diseases... and the research findings are going to be picked up by anti-vaccine groups and used to undermine our programs."

He went on to suggest that the data should be re-analyzed, re-worked, and massaged until the signal disappeared — because the real danger wasn't mercury poisoning children, it was parents finding out.

Dr. Roger Bernier of the CDC acknowledged the gravity:

"We have asked you to keep this information confidential. We do not want this document to be made public."

He literally said the quiet part out loud.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 13
1/7 🧵

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: Ordinary Brits Flood the Streets of Liverpool While the Political Class Hides Behind “Diversity” Slogans and Dispersal Zones

#EnoughIsEnough #CountyRoad #BritsHaveSpoken #NoMoreIllegals #MassDeportationNow #HopeNotHypocrisy #WorkingClassVoices #TheTideIsTurning #OrdinaryPeopleUnite #DispersalZoneDemocracy #FlagAndCountry #TheyCantArrestUsAll #LiverpoolRising #UnitedKingdomFirst #SayItLoud
2/7

They called them extremists.

They called them far-right thugs.

They called them a “threat to democracy.”

But today on County Road, Liverpool—150+ ordinary Brits stood under Union Jacks and did something the establishment finds absolutely terrifying:

They showed up.

Not politicians. Not NGO-funded activists with pre-printed signs. Not the professional grievance class that parades through city centres every Pride month with corporate sponsorships and police escorts.

No—these were brickies, shopkeepers, pensioners, young lads who’ve watched their neighbourhoods transform into places they barely recognise. And they marched under slogans the media refuses to print without scare quotes: “No More Illegals.” “Mass Deportations.”

And the response from the powers that be?

A dispersal zone. A Section 60 order granting police the right to demand you remove your face covering or face arrest. A Section 60AA authorisation that lets officers literally seize your scarf if they suspect you’re hiding your identity.

Read that again.

When Black Lives Matter shut down motorways and toppled statues, it was “mostly peaceful protest.” When Extinction Rebellion glued themselves to trains and blocked ambulances, it was “civil disobedience in the tradition of Gandhi.”

But when working-class Scousers walk down their own streets with flags and grievances about mass migration?

Dispersal zone. 9am to midnight. Arrest powers activated.
3/7

🎭 The Theatre of “Hope Not Hate.”

Liverpool Council leader Liam Robinson—a Labour man, naturally—rushed out an open letter declaring Liverpool “a city of hope, not hate.” He invoked the docks. He invoked “generations of people from across the world.” He name-dropped the upcoming Pride celebrations, because apparently the correct response to citizens protesting immigration policy is to remind them that rainbow flags are coming next month.

This is the script now. Every single time.

1. Ordinary people organise a protest about a material reality—housing shortages, wage suppression, cultural displacement, crime.

2. The political class ignores the substance entirely.

3. Instead, they issue a statement about diversity being our strength and standing together against hate.

4. Police are given extraordinary powers.

5. The local paper runs a headline about fear and anxiety among the community—meaning the people who oppose the protesters, never the protesters themselves, whose fears are what triggered the march in the first place.

It’s a magic trick. You take a policy grievance, and you alchemise it into a morality play where anyone questioning immigration is the villain, and the council leader who’s never lived on County Road is the hero.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 10
1/10 🧵

🗳️ TWO DOLLAR DEMOCRACY: Skid Row Woman Exposes Democrat Ballot-Buying Operation — “They Come Out Here All The Time.”

🔥 BOUGHT FOR A BUS FARE: Democrats Harvest Homeless Votes on Skid Row for $2 a Ballot — and She Says They Never Stop Coming

@camhigby @JamesOKeefeIII @nickshirleyy

#TwoDollarDemocracy #SkidRowBallotHarvest #BoughtForABuck #KarenBassExposed #DemocratVoteFactory #BallotHarvestingIsReal #TheyComeOutHereAllTheTime #IndustrialScaleFraud #OkeefeExposes #YourVoteIsWorthless #VulnerableNotVoiceless #LAIsABananaRepublic
2/10

💀 The Quote That Says It All

“They told you to vote for Karen?”

“Yeah, had to sign a little thing.”

“And how much do they pay you?”

“Just like $2.”

“They do this for everybody out here?”

“Yeah, they come out here all the time.”

A homeless woman on Skid Row, voice steady, eyes direct, no hesitation. No coaching. No script. Just the truth spilling out onto the pavement where America’s largest city lets its most vulnerable rot — then harvests them like a crop every election cycle.
3/10

🎥 The Evidence

James O’Keefe and Cam Higby didn’t need a three-year investigation to find this. They just... went there. Walked the same streets Karen Bass claims to care about. Found the human beings she uses as ballot-filling machines, then discards them back into the tent cities her policies perpetuate.

The video — raw, unedited, devastating — shows exactly what California’s political machine has normalized:

- Canvassers targeting the homeless with pre-filled ballots

- Direct payment for votes — the literal definition of vote buying

- Systematic, repeated operations — “they come out here all the time.”

- Signature harvesting — “had to sign a little thing.”

This isn’t some rogue operation. This is infrastructure. This is how you win elections in a one-party state when your policies have produced the largest homeless crisis in American history: you pay the victims to re-elect their victimizers.
Read 10 tweets
Jun 9
1/8 🧵

🚨 YOUR OPINIONS ARE NOW A DIAGNOSIS — Canada Just Soviet-Style “Certified” a Biophysicist for an Opinion They Do Not Like — You’re Witnessing a Medical Kidnapping ☠️

They didn’t charge him with a crime. They didn’t need to.

Nicholas Jordan Wagter — 27 years old, Honors Medical Biophysics (Western), Master’s in Innovation Management (U of T), published peer-reviewed author in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience — was pulled over in Vancouver on May 23, 2026, by police and a CAR 87 mental health crisis team.

He’s been locked in a psychiatric ward ever since.

His offense? Handing out a document in coffee shops.

The document — titled “CHINA VANCOUVER ATTEMPT” — cites CSIS, RCMP, NSICOP, and the Hogue Commission on foreign interference.

It connects dots between CCP influence operations, illegal police stations, UNDRIP sovereignty issues, and federal bills C-8, C-9, C-15, and C-21. Whether you agree with every line or not, he’s citing official Canadian intelligence reports. This isn’t tinfoil-hat territory — these are documents Canada’s own spy agencies produced.

Here’s where it gets dystopian:

A psychiatrist — Dr. Christine Taylor of Vancouver Coastal Health — reportedly spotted Wagter in a café.

Not in a clinical setting. Not during a scheduled evaluation. In a Tim Hortons. She observed him, consulted his family, and issued a Form 4 certification under BC’s Mental Health Act. Wagter was never notified. Never given a voluntary assessment option. Never even told he’d been certified until police surrounded his vehicle three weeks later.

The officer’s own words on bodycam, captured by Wagter: “Dr. Taylor saw you in a cafe. She didn’t certify you then. And then she spoke with your family, got some more information, and... you’re going to have to turn that camera off.”

Turn the camera off. Of course.

When Wagter — calm, compliant, repeatedly offering to come in voluntarily for an appointment — refused to stop filming, Dr. Emery (senior resident, CAR 87) certified him a second time on the spot. Destination: Vancouver General Hospital, involuntary psychiatric ward. No judge. No hearing. No due process. Just a psychiatrist who didn’t like what she saw in a coffee shop.

#MedicalKidnapping #FreeNicholasWagter #PsychiatryIsTheNewGulag #CanadaPoliceState #Form4Tyranny #SovietStylePsychiatry #DissentIsNotDiagnosis #CivilLibertiesAreDead #VancouverDetention #CCPInCanada #SluggishSchizophrenia2026 #YourOpinionsAreADiagnosis #MentalHealthActAbuse #InstitutionalOverreach #WakeUpCanada
2/8

The “Sluggish Schizophrenia” Playbook Is Back

This isn’t new. It’s just been rebranded.

The Soviet Union perfected this technique from the 1960s through 1986. Dissidents who criticized the regime weren’t imprisoned as political prisoners — that looked bad internationally. Instead, they were diagnosed with “sluggish schizophrenia,” a conveniently vague condition whose symptoms included “reform delusions,” “struggle for the truth,” and “perseverance.” Professor Andrei Snezhnevsky and the Moscow School of Psychiatry cooked up a diagnostic framework so elastic that opposing the government became, by definition, a mental illness.

At least 20,000 Soviet citizens were locked in Special Psychiatric Hospitals for purely political reasons — no trial, no charges, indefinite detention — all under the benevolent banner of “treatment.”

Yuri Andropov, KGB chief, formalized the system in 1969 with Decree No. 345–209. The logic was airtight: anyone who rejected the best sociopolitical system in the world must be insane. There was no other explanation.

Sound familiar?
3/8

BC’s Mental Health Act: The Legal Black Hole

Here’s what the law actually permits in British Columbia:

- A physician can issue a Form 4 medical certificate for involuntary 48-hour detention based on observation — not necessarily a formal examination

- BC’s own guidebook states that in “unusual cases,” a physician can certify someone by “listening to the person speak” and reviewing “information supplied by those who know the person”

- The certificate can be extended — up to one month with further certifications

- There is no requirement to notify the person they’ve been certified

- There is no judicial review before detention begins

- The certification paperwork, clinical notes, and police file are not public

That last point is the kill shot. Vancouver Coastal Health, the VPD, and the hospital can all say “trust the process” while hiding every document behind patient confidentiality.

Wagter can scream from inside the ward — and he has been, posting videos titled “UNLAWFUL CERTIFICATION UNDER THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT” and “Proof I’m still in here” — but the institution holds all the cards.

They can claim he’s paranoid. They can claim he’s manic. They can claim anything. And he can’t refute it because the evidence of what they actually wrote about him is sealed.

This is the perfect system for disappearing inconvenient people. No criminal charges. No public trial. No messy evidence standards. Just a psychiatrist’s signature and a police escort.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 9
1/6 🧵

And for the record. Those morons still hanging onto the 2020 steal, “60 courts dismissed the cases” canard — the intellectual crutch of people who’ve never actually read a single one of those rulings.

Let me dismantle this for the slow kids in the back.
2/6

⚖️ “Dozens of Courts Rejected the Claims!” — The Mother of All Misrepresentations

This talking point is a masterclass in conflating procedural dismissal with adjudication on the merits. The two are not remotely the same thing, and anyone who says otherwise is either lying to you or too lazy to check.

Standing: The Invisible Wall

The overwhelming majority of cases were tossed on standing — meaning the court never even looked at the evidence because it ruled the plaintiffs weren’t the right people to bring the suit.

Think about what that means: a judge says “you personally weren’t harmed enough to sue over this,” and the media reports it as “COURT REJECTS FRAUD CLAIMS.” That’s not a ruling on whether fraud happened. That’s a ruling on who gets to ask the question. It’s like a bouncer turning you away at the door and the newspapers reporting you lost the fight inside.

Laches: “You Waited Too Long”

Another chunk of dismissals came via laches — the doctrine that says you should’ve sued earlier. Again, zero examination of evidence. The court is saying, “we’re not even looking at your proof because of the calendar.” And this gets tallied as “another loss for Trump.”

Mootness: “The Election’s Over”

Several cases were dismissed as moot because the Electoral College had already voted or Biden had been certified. Translation: “You’re right that this might have been fraudulent, but it’s too late to do anything about it now.” Not an exoneration. An expiration date.

The Merits Cases That Weren’t

When you strip out standing, laches, and mootness dismissals, the number of cases that actually reached the merits — where evidence was examined and ruled upon — shrinks to a tiny handful.

And even in those? Several judges acknowledged irregularities but ruled the margin was too large for the specific violations to have changed the outcome. That’s not “no fraud.” That’s “not enough fraud that we can quantify to flip the result." There’s a difference, and it matters.
3/6

🧮 The Math That Makes People Uncomfortable

Let’s talk about what didn’t get litigated because the courts never got there:

- The statistical anomalies in the swing-state vote dumps — abrupt spikes at 3 AM with 100% Biden shares
- The Antrim County, Michigan, forensic audit that found a 68% error rate in the Dominion system
- The Georgia surveillance footage of suitcases being pulled from under tables after observers were sent home
- The Pennsylvania mail-in ballots that were counted in violation of the state’s own election code — something Justice Alito and two other justices explicitly noted was unconstitutional
- The Zuckerberg-funded CTCL grants that effectively privatized election administration in Democratic strongholds

None of this was “debunked.” It was never reached.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 9
1/5 🧵

For the Morons Denying the Rigged Election Reality in California, the Same Morons Still Claim the 2020 Election Steal Was Adjudicated. HINT: IT WASN’T!

All right, let’s walk through this step by step so even the densest observer can follow along. California didn’t suddenly “forget” how to count votes — they engineered a system where the outcome is perpetually malleable.
2/5

🗳️ The Architecture of the Grift

The entire setup is a masterclass in manufacturing ambiguity. Here’s how the components fit together:

1. Universal Vote-by-Mail With No ID Requirement

California mails a ballot to every registered voter (see post below) — over 23 million of them — whether they asked for one or not. No voter ID required to cast it. No in-person verification. Just a signature match (sort of) against whatever scribble is on file from whenever someone registered.

The DOJ’s First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli put it bluntly:

“Universal vote-by-mail with no voter ID requirements creates conditions where fraud can go undetected and unpunished, eroding public confidence.”

He’s not wrong. When you remove every friction point that verifies who is actually voting, you’re not expanding access — you’re expanding opportunity for abuse.

2. The 30-Day “Count” — A Feature, Not a Bug

Under California law, county election officials get up to 30 days to finish counting. The primary was June 2, 2026. Final certification isn’t until July 10. That’s over five weeks.

What happens during those five weeks? Ballots materialize. Leads evaporate. Magic ballots appear on demand. The numbers shift — always in the same direction. Never in favor of the right. EVER.

The poster child this cycle: Spencer Pratt had a 40,000-vote lead on Election Night in the LA mayoral primary. Then the “late-counted” ballots arrived, and suddenly progressive Nithya Raman (who had pretty much conceded, tears and all) advances instead. Same pattern, different election, every cycle.

Secretary of State Shirley Weber’s (can we unseal her criminal background?) defense is: “Accuracy comes before speed.” Spare me. Florida and Texas manage to count their votes within hours. California has 23 million registered voters and somehow needs a month? That’s not accuracy — that’s a window.

3. Ballot Seizures and Stonewalling

The Riverside County situation is revealing. Sheriff Chad Bianco (a Republican gubernatorial candidate) seized roughly 650,000 ballots from the county registrar after a watchdog group found discrepancies in the 2025 special election tally. Rather than investigate the discrepancies, what did Sacramento do?

Newsom signed SB 73 — making it a crime for law enforcement to take custody of ballots, punishable by a $1,000 fine and up to three years in prison. The message is unmistakable: looking too closely at the ballots will get you prosecuted.

Meanwhile, California’s Democratic AG Rob Bonta has been stonewalling federal requests for over a year to audit the voter rolls under federal law. That case is now before the 9th Circuit. What exactly are they hiding that requires a court battle to keep sealed?

4. Blocking Signature Challenges

SB 73 also prohibits election observers from challenging mail-in ballots on the basis of signature mismatches.

Think about that: the one and ONLY actual verification mechanism that exists for mail ballots, and they made it illegal to question it. You can’t make this up.

5. The Marina del Rey Case

Federal prosecutors already charged a woman in Marina del Rey for paying people — including the homeless on Skid Row — to register to vote. That’s not a hypothetical. That’s an actual federal case showing how California’s porous system gets exploited. And that’s just what got caught.
3/5

🧠 The “Nothing to See Here” Gaslighting

The institutional response follows a predictable script:

- “No evidence of widespread fraud” — because the system is designed to make detecting fraud nearly impossible. No ID, no chain of custody on ballot collection, signature challenges banned, voter rolls shielded from audit. You can’t find what you’ve structurally prevented anyone from looking for.

- “This is just how California counts votes” — as if a broken process becomes legitimate through repetition.

- “Trump has no evidence” — while simultaneously fighting tooth and nail to prevent anyone from examining the evidence that would settle the question.

The American Enterprise Institute’s John Fortier is trotted out to say the delays are “consistent with past cycles” and people should just trust the process. This is the same think-tank apparatus that’s been wrong about everything for decades, now asking for blind faith. Fortier would be selling “Clark Stanley’s Snake Oil Liniment” in the 1890s.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(