1/ Outgoing US DNI Tulsi Gabbard's release of "evidence of US biolabs" around the world, with Ukraine singled out in her statement, is being widely cited by Russian commentators as proof of Russia's propaganda conspiracy theories on the topic. ⬇️
2/ Many Russian warbloggers and commentators have reported the release. A number have taken the opportunity to highlight how, in their view, Gabbard has vindicated Russia's claims about "Ukrainian biolabs" which were supposedly being used to develop biological weapons.
3/ Among them is Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, whose department has been a key player in promoting those claims. She applauds Gabbard's actions:
4/ "This is all something we and the Russian Ministry of Defence have repeatedly reported, drawing the international community's attention to the dangerous and uncontrolled military biological activities of the United States outside its territory, including in Ukraine."
5/ Sergey Kolyasnikov asks:
"Why did the US create and fund 40 biolaboratories in Ukraine with such pathogens? And not only in Ukraine, by the way.
Surely everyone understands the 'why'?"
6/ Kiril Federov sees vindication for Russia:
"And remember how this was one of the topics at the beginning of the Special Military Operation, when our forces declared these labs a threat? And many laughed. Is it funny now?"
7/ 'BP online' hails the announcement: "This is amazing. Once again, Russian propaganda wasn't lying."
'Denazification UA' also says that Gabbard has confirmed Russia's narrative:
8/ "Once again, what has been criticised for many years and dismissed as a conspiracy theory has been confirmed. But what is the point? It is also unclear why they have suddenly become so candid over the past year."
9/ 'Obsessed with war' is sarcastic, describing the biolabs claim as now proven after being called "'Russian propaganda to justify the war', as the svidomites [pro-Ukrainians] have been saying for so many years."
10/ Warblogger Tatyana Montyan says that the release proves Russia's conspiracy theory that the biolabs were part of a Biden-Ukrainian plot to exterminate Russians with biological weapons:
11/ "As far as I can recall, this is the first statement from U.S. officials that work on enhancing pathogens—or, in other words, creating biological weapons—was being conducted in biolabs in Ukraine.
12/ "It's clear against whom these weapons were intended to be used, and one can only be astonished that the Ukrainian government allowed such research to take place on its territory.
13/ "It's quite clear that if a truly massive epidemic were to break out in Russia, Ukraine would also be affected. So, essentially, we're talking about research into biological weapons, which, if necessary, would also strike Ukraine itself.
14/ "What a kamikaze country this truly is!"
'Mishutki Palych' claims that Gabbard's release means that "what was just yesterday dismissed as "Russian disinformation" is now being calmly discussed by American officials and major Western publications."
15/ He says that Gabbard has undercut all of the US's allies and Russia's own domestic liberals who rejected the Russian goverment's claims:
"The most wonderful thing is how quickly the "truth" changes in the Western information machine."
16/ "Yesterday, they explained to you that there were no biolabs at all. Today, they say: well, yes, there were labs, but they were solely for security reasons, and even that was very bad.
17/ "Tomorrow, they'll say: yes, there were dangerous experiments, but individual officials are to blame.
The classic dialectic of bourgeois propaganda: not the denial of facts as such, but the constant rewriting of the acceptable version of reality...
18/ "Back [in 2022], a resolution to investigate the activities of American biolabs in Ukraine was predictably blocked by the US, Britain, and France, while the domestic liberal public gleefully embraced the Western playbook about "conspiracy theorists" and "Kremlin fakes."
19/ "Many of them then literally delighted in telling the public that no American biolabs existed, and that any talk of them was the preserve of crazy Kremlin bots.
20/ "Now, however, the situation is extremely awkward. Because acknowledging this reality means admitting that for several years they served foreign propaganda and were themselves disseminators of outright disinformation."
21/ "And not acknowledging this means pretending that today's statements by American intelligence and Western media publications simply don't exist." /end
1/ Ukraine's attacks on Russia's oil refineries are reportedly pushing them into a crisis, with a loss of control over fuel supplies and a lack of effective anti-drone defences. Russian oil giant Rosneft is reportedly pushing for nationalisation. ⬇️
2/ Russia's oil refinery ownership is dominated by a handful of large vertically integrated companies. State-controlled Rosneft and Gazprom Neft control the largest and most modern refineries, along with a number of private companies including Lukoil, Surgutneftegas, and Tatneft.
3/ All of these companies' refineries have come under repeated and highly costly attacks from Ukrainian drones, which have caused increasing shortages of fuel across western Russia. There is said to be a critical lack of coordinated efforts to defend the refineries.
1/ Many of the Russian soldiers seen daily being blown up by Ukrainian drones are there not because they're trained infantry, but are specialists or even officers who are being sent to their deaths as a punishment. A Russian colonel says he's never seen anything like it. ⬇️
2/ An 'old recruit' who has survived two years' service in the Russian army writes to warblogger and journalist Maxim Kalashnikov to relay his experience of how the army is routinely sending men to die in assaults for displeasing their superiors, regardless of their expertise:
3/ "About a month ago, I managed to meet with an officer from our artillery battalion. We started serving in it at the same time. I was dropped from the unit to the hospital earlier. He displeased his superiors and ended up in an assault unit. He wasn't alone, though.
1/ The Russian government claims that Ukraine's drone attacks against Russia are for political rather than military aims, given the supposed impossibility of a Ukrainian victory. A Russian warblogger warns that this is a dangerous illusion resulting from distorted information. ⬇️
2/ Svyatoslav Golikov, author of the 'Philologist in Ambush' Telegram channel, writes:
3/ "The official domestic information space is circulating the idea that enemy air strikes on critical infrastructure, primarily fuel and energy facilities and logistics,…
1/ Russian warbloggers are baffled and angry at the Kalashikov Group's announcement of a single-shot shotgun, chambered in a lower-powered calibre, for shooting down drones. One comments that "You can probably only shoot yourself with it". ⬇️
2/ In a Telegram post on 8 June, the Kalashnikov Group announced a new gun produced by specialists at the Central Research Institute of Precision Engineering (JSC TsNIITochMash, part of the Rostec State Corporation under the management of the Kalashnikov Group):
3/ "This compact, single-shot shotgun chambered for 12x70 mm cartridges is designed to defeat small, low-flying UAVs. The weapon's main advantage is its compact size and light weight—weighing only 1.8 kg."
1/ Why is Russia so vulnerable to Ukraine's mid-range drone attacks? Russian drone developer Alexey Chadayev says that it's due to an ongoing and unresolved series of Russian failures in developing new interceptor drones and anti-drone capabilities. ⬇️
The balance of the war has shifted significantly in the enemy's favour, not because of any problems on our part at the front—the same positional dragging continues there, essentially."
3/ "Problems have arisen in the rear—due to the exponential increase in the number and capabilities of deep strikes and middle strikes, as well as the focused pressure on our logistics, especially fuel and energy infrastructure.
1/ Russia faces "tectonic events" in the near future due to Ukraine's seizure of the initiative in the war, which presages an "impending disaster", according to a gloomy commentary by Russian journalist and warblogger Maxim Kalashnikov. ⬇️
2/ Kalashnikov draws attention to the convergence of several unfavourable trends for Russia – economic, military and industrial – which he says are seriously threatening a Russian war effort that is faltering and weakened by chronic corruption, inertia, and backward-thinking.
3/ He writes:
"We are on the eve of a new upheaval. Anyone who studied dialectical and historical materialism ... knows that the number of changes always leads to a qualitative leap. Or a collapse.
War in early summer 2026 is the threshold of the latter. What do we have?"