arctotherium Profile picture
Jun 22 15 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Thread with excerpts from the Mexican-American War section of TR Fehrenbach's "Fire and Blood: A History of Mexico" (1973). Since independence, Mexico had seemingly gone backwards in all respects; in 1840 Mexico was less civilized than it had been. Image
An incident where French warships blockaded Veracruz over nonpayment of debts from unstable and perpetually-bankrupt Mexican governments. The Mexican response: show "Death to the Anglo-Saxons and Jews" and bring back Santa Anna. Image
After the secession of Texas, Mexico appeared to be disintegrating, with the Pacific areas effectively independent, much of the North run by bandits chiefs, and Yucatan seceding. Image
Somehow, Santa Anna returned (after yet another coup). Image
Inevitably, Santa Anna ran out of money again and was ran out of Mexico in yet another coup. Meanwhile, Texas and Mexico were fighting an undeclared war, with Mexican atrocities against Texan prisoners. Image
Polk was happy to bargain with the Mexican Government, offering to pay them desperately needed cash in exchange for depopulated land, but didn't understand the Mexican need to preserve appearances. Image
Image
After the war began (over Mexicans attacking the US Army in land between the Rio Grande and Rio Nueces, claimed by both Mexico and Texas), the US strategy was to seize the despoblada (US Southwest), which was defenseless (which they did trivially), then invade Mexico proper. Image
The US military establishment had never fought a war and was consistently greatly outnumbered in Mexico proper (rarely more than 10K troops), but won anyways due to superior morale and technique. The distance, terrain, and climate was more dangerous than the Mexicans. Image
Early US victories in the North toppled the Mexican government, various caciques in the provinces started an insurgency against the Mexican government, and Santa Anna tricked the Yankees into letting him back into Mexican, where he was given power yet again. Image
In the meantime, the Democratic Polk administration fell out with the Whig army leaders (mostly Taylor); this led to an amphibious invasion across the Gulf of Mexico through Veracruz under Winfield Scott. Image
Santa Anna, who was actually a decent general, surprised Taylor with a force outnumbering them 3:1, but superior American artillery decided the issue. Image
When Winfield Scott, launching an amphibious invasion from Veracruz across the Gulf of Mexico, landed to attack the Mexican heartland with a greatly outnumbered force, almost all contemporary military opinion regarded him as lost. He took inspiration from Cortes. Image
Santa Anna's generalship was good, but his junior officers were terrible. Scott beat the Mexicans in several battles and took Mexico City without resistance; the Americans neither looted nor raped the city. Image
Image
The Americans did not have a great counter to Mexican guerilla war, but the Mexican elite did not want to spark a general insurgency, fearing it would devour them as well. The North was once again threatening secession and a whites vs Indians race war began in the Yucatan. Image
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was basically fair; it took territories only nominally Mexican for a realistic price. Neither the income nor usable resources of Mexico were reduced. But it devastated Mexican pride, as they had not won even a single battle. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with arctotherium

arctotherium Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @arctotherium42

Jun 22
Excerpts from TR Fehrenbach's "Fire and Blood: A History of Mexico" (1973). The Porfiriato gave Mexico a generation of stability and development for the first time since independence. This left Mexico overdue for another civil war: the Mexican Revolution.
One problem was that the Porfirian school system had created a large, literate middle structure (not class). These educated mestizos became dissatisfied due to lack of opportunity; growth was rapid but not rapid enough to absorb them all. Image
The Revolution kicked off in 1910, when Diaz announced he'd won reelection with 99% of the vote. This kicked off an insurgency in Chihuahua, in the mestizo, frontier north. Image
Image
Read 26 tweets
Jun 22
Thread with excerpts from the 'Porfiriato' section of TR Fehrenbach's "Fire and Blood: A History of Mexico" (1973). This was the first era of stability and economic growth in post-independence Mexico, summed up with the slogan "Order and Progress." Image
Independent Mexico's problem was that Mexicans were incapable of setting aside personalisms for truly national institutions; congress, for example, was a joke. Image
Benito Juarez greatly expanded secular education; but this turned out to be more of a curse than a boon, because the vast majority of people with schooling insisted on government or legal jobs; very few became doctors or engineers or technicians. Image
Read 18 tweets
Jun 22
Thread with excerpts from TR Fehrenbach's "Fire and Blood: A History of Mexico" (1973), late 19th century. Like before the war, Mexico after the Mex/Am War was a mess, with many regions sinking into barbarism. Yucatan was the worst, with half the population dying in a race war. Image
Every Mexican president was a Freemason, but Catholicism was still universal and the position of the Church, which retained its royal privileges even in republican Mexico, was a flashpoint. Image
The Mexican Church was immensely wealthy thanks to its tax-advantaged status, and the clergy retained legal privileges. It also collected extremely high fees; one effect of this was to ~abolish marriage among the lower classes. Image
Read 14 tweets
Jun 21
Thread with excerpts from the 'Pretorians' section of TR Fehrenbach's "Fire and Blood: A History of Mexico" (1973). In 1821, postcolonial nation-building seemed easy; the only example was the USA. But the US was homogenous, well-led, free, and already had an identity. Image
Mexico was the reverse, with no history of self-rule, the criollo/casta/indio split, and no great leadership. The two major factions were the 'continuistas' (conservatives) and the 'reformistas' (liberals). Image
Image
Mexico was the reverse, with no history of self-rule, the criollo/casta/indio split, and no great leadership. The two major factions were the 'continuistas' (conservatives) and the 'reformistas' (liberals). Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Jun 21
Excerpts from TR Fehrenbach's "Fire and Blood: A History of Mexico" (1973) on the Mexican War of Independence. The Mexican criollos were far less impressive than their South American counterparts, and produced no leaders equal to Bolivar or San Martin. Image
Where the South American criollos quickly declared independence upon the French conquest of Spain, the Mexican ones dithered. Acting quickly, the local peninsulares coup'd the government and the criollos accepted it. Image
Image
With the criollos basically accepting Spanish domination, leadership of the independence struggle passed to men like Miguel Hidalgo, who turned it from a (hopefully) bloodless coup to a social and race war. Image
Read 12 tweets
Jun 21
Thread with excerpts from the Colonial New Spain portion of TR Fehrenbach's 'Fire and Blood: A History of Mexico' (1973). His view is that New Spain would have remained permanent divided and stagnant if not for the northern frontier. Image
The true frontier of New Spain was not the thinly-populated and stagnant (almost identical when the Anglos showed up as in the 17th century) New Mexico, but much further to the south, in the arid regions only a little north of the Valley of Mexico. Image
Image
The frontier lacked civilized Indians who could be reduced to slaves, and was instead populated by energetic mestizos and criollos, working owned ranchos for a market rather than owning huge estates for prestige. Image
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(