This is a sad Parsha in many ways. In this Torah portion, God instructs Moses and Aaron regarding the red heifer. Miriam, who is the sister of Moses and Aaron, dies. 1)
Moses hits a rock to bring forth water rather than speaking to it. At the end of the parsha, Aaron dies.
Of course, there is more to it.
After years of wandering through the desert, the people arrive in the wilderness of Zin. Miriam dies, and
2)
the people thirst for water. G‑d tells Moses to speak to a rock and command it to give water. Moses gets angry at the complaining people and strikes the stone. Water flows, but Moses is told by G‑d that neither he nor Aaron will enter the Promised Land.
3)
Aaron dies soon after and is followed in the high priesthood by his son Elazar who he trained.
Moses leads the people in war against the Emorite kings Sichon and Og (who seek to prevent Israel’s passage through their territory) and conquers their lands,
4)
which lie east of the Jordan River and today are parts of modern Jordan.
So what lessons can we learn from this Parsha?
As I see it, there is one big lesson. When faced with a real problem, whining about it is a waste of energy. Getting angry and
5)
responding irrationally to those that are whining is counterproductive. And, finally, responsible action to solve problems is the only thing that works.
6)
Our Sages said that Moshe was banned from entering the land because he disobeyed when he struck the rock in anger at the people. Though Moshe made a mistake to act out in anger, I think his not being allowed to enter the land had a more serious and more important reason.
7)
For 40 years, Moshe was sort of the father figure of the nation, the judge of last resort, the one to provide solutions to all problems, almost like an absolute monarch with final authority on everything and
8)
there is a dangerous tendency to start thinking of such important figures almost like gods that one cannot do without.
9)
But a people who have now been told not to have any other gods, not to be dependent on one hero, one leader, one person seen as closer to HaShem than others, the loss of such a leader with no preparation and alternatives appointed, before entering the land,
10)
could have led to tragedy. Consider what a tragedy it might have been had Moshe entered the land with the people and then died while they were going through the stressful process of getting their land and organizing their lives.
11)
The whole enterprise might have been seriously damaged.
Interestingly, Torah is so insistent on not making a man a hero or an idol to follow, that it never mentions any special status for Moshe’s children. Power would not be handed down based on blood.
12)
Before they entered the land, the new lines of authority had to be established, and they had to be established without expecting Moshe to be the final authority on everything or even as a figurehead or person making decisions as the last resort.
13)
What we are seeing is the wisdom of the Creator, understanding the creation, and doing what was needed.
One more interesting observation. At a time when wandering was nearing an end, we see Moshe reacting to a situation, in fact losing his temper, and
14)
striking a rock to bring forth water. The top guy, the infallible leader, the man closest to HaShem, acting in an irresponsible manner, showing a flaw in character.
15)
The lesson? Don’t worship leaders, do not make them into idols or picture them as infallible. No leader is to be followed unquestionably.
שבת שלום--"
16)
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Roger Froikin, @rlefraim wrote, "JUST A THOUGHT ABOUT THE USA ON ITS 250TH BIRTHDAY
The USA is still different than the rest of the world, and here are a few reasons:
1)
1. That has as its basic belief, that all men are created equal, and that no man is the subject of a leader, a government, a king, or any other human being.
2)
2. The only nation that has incorporated into its basic laws (the US Constitution) a list of rights that the individual citizen has that government cannot take away — 'The Bill of Rights.'
3)
Regime change in Iran would solve many of the most serious problems facing the Middle East. It would remove what many consider the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism, cutting off the regime's financial and military support for Hamas, 1)
Hezbol!ah, the Houthis, and other Iranian-backed proxy groups.
It would also fulfill the promise President Trump made to the Irqnian people when he expressed support for their struggle against the Islamic Republic.
2)
Many Iranians interpreted his message as encouragement to continue seeking freedom despite the risks. According to figures cited by commentators such as Goldie Ghamari and Mayar Tousi, between 40,000 and 50,000 Ir@nians—including protesters, women, children, and
3)
The JD Vance MOU, if carried through successfully, risks handing the Islamic Republic of Iran a strategic lifeline that directly undermines the expansion of the Abraham Accords.
1)
The likely end state is not regional stability, but a recalibration in which Iran regains economic and geopolitical breathing room and rebuilds while Gulf states grow more hesitant to align openly with Israel.
2)
Even under nominal compliance, Ir@n has a long track record of testing boundaries—probing how far “compliance” can be stretched while preserving its long-term strategic goals.
3)
Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf (born 1961) is a terrorist in a suit and is far from the moderate he is being painted at this time by the Trump administration. He was the IRGC brigadier general who has served as the Speaker of the Parliament of Ir@n since 2020.
1)
The United States designated the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) on April 15, 2019. The designation was made by the Trump administration under Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, citing the IRGC's support for proxy militias and
2)
destabilizing activities across the Middle East. The United States cannot make a deal with the IRGC because of this designation. However, as he is now the Speaker of the Parliament that evidently magically changes who he is according to the Trump administration.
3)
at Columbia University, she was recruited as a Middle East analyst after graduation. Her CIA service included:
Roles: She served as a political analyst (2003–2004) and intelligence briefer (2004–2005).
2)
Deployments: She completed three tours in Iraq (2006–2007), where she led a CIA assessment team and worked alongside U.S. military forces to counter violent militias.
She is fluent in Arabic and Swahili, which facilitated her work in the region.
3)
Roger Froikin @rlefraim wrote, "Senator Elizabeth Slotkin has introduced a bill banning sending US military to polling places
1)
This is exactly what I have been writing about — Senators and House members proposing laws that demonstrate their ignorance of US law and even of the US Constitution to which they made an oath.
2)
You see, there already is a law on the books. You see, in the United States, we already have the Federal Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. This statute severely restricts the use of the U.S. military—
3)