It's part of a far-right extremist lobbying pipeline that's been going on for at least 15+ years, and is now seeing the 'fruits' of its labor.
3/10
Major far-right lobbying groups will spend a large sums of money on what they call 'community outreach and advocacy programs'
This has meant things like running ads & paying people to post 'opinion pieces' on sites like 4chan to 'seed ideology'
4/10
It's also meant providing funding to conservative clubs at high schools and colleges across the country.
The lobbyists then these networks to identify smart, right-leaning, but vulnerable individuals they can push extremist ideology on.
5/10
They give them scholarships, internships, references and all kinds of support to help up their pedigree while exposing them to their specific school of thought.
Then through donor networks, they call in favors to get these individuals placed as staffers on the hill.
6/10
Young Republican staffers have a higher concentration of extremist views tied to lobbying groups and thinktanks than ever before.
You can see it in office decorations and comms accounts, countless subtle callouts to white nationalist movements.
7/10
And many times, this is all entirely unknown to the Congressional representative.
These staffers don't really report in to the Congress person. They answer to a now indoctrinated ideology from their lobbying group - often with their own handler.
8/10
The reason the Patriot Front wears masks isn't because they fear losing their jobs.
It's because lobbying groups know if you knew what percentage of them were staffers, you'd realize just how deeply compromised the government is.
9/10
These are the people shaping policy, and advising your members of Congress, and managing internal ops at the White House
These are often the people being groomed for the next run at an open Congressional seat.
Often all while pretending to be a moderate in front of their boss.
10/10
They 'disappeared' after the last election, because many of them had new jobs in Congress or at the White House and they had achieved their objective.
But the reason you can assemble 400 of them at the drop of a hat in DC, is because they are already there, and it's a short ride on the train lines they already commute, to get to the hill.
Realized a MASSIVE hole in Thomas' reasoning that would create a chaotic loophole:
* A child born here to non-US parents could end up Stateless but present in the US.
BUT that's an issue:
-Under INA § 101(a)(42), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42) an asylum claim regarding being 'stateless' is not enough for asylum to be granted.
2/7
BUT, if they are stateless because they were denied registration of their birth or citizenship in the country they were born because of ethnicity, social group, or nationality, that is a valid asylum case.
The child must be allowed to stay.
3/7
Even prior to that standards on holding of withdrawal (INA § 241(b)(3), 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3).) mean that we cannot remove someone to a country other than:
* Their country of citizenship
* Their country of last entry
The child has neither a country of citizenship or of last entry and cannot be removed - and you cannot detain them if removal is not foreseeable (Zadvydas v. Davis.)
Trump has ERODED the US' global footprint in a way that will likely shape the world for the next century:
-Ending US aide
-Failing to stand up for Ukraine
-Violating sovereignty in Venezuela
-Weak statements on Taiwan
-Folding on Iran
-Having China push Iran to the table
-Ending US development investment in Africa and Latin America
-Trade wars with South East Asia
-Pushing Canada and the EU into deeper trade relations with China
These have all rapidly diminished the US global sphere of influence, to the smallest its EVER been in the modern era.
2/10
The US spent a century building a sphere of influence that was broad and unchallenged.
It triumphed through cultural export that came on the backs of economic development and unwavering defense agreements.
America was a country you could trust, and it's help was of value.
4/10
Under that doctrine, the US had it's peak global influence around the 2000s, especially as this aligned with EU peak influence and the EU was an unwavering US ally against the China-Russia axis.
Some Pakistani sources close to the negotiations think the current Iran trips are part of plan to *TRICK* American negotiators into a bias peace deal.
Aimed at *appearing* to appease the US until AFTER the midterms, and then continuing a hardline agenda.
2/7
* Multiple sources have told me that Iran’s discussion of any potential concessions are oddly fixated on the first 8-12 months.
* One source said they’ve been told that’s because Iran believes after the mid-terms Trump will be a “lame duck” not authorized for aggression
3/7
* The trips to Oman and Russia seem to be focused on having allies implement short term programs, that “take 6-8 months to implement” and have the “appearance of concessions”
* For Oman this would mean a “joint responsibility” in the Strait in a “transition phase”
And 7 others had JPL connections via NASA/JPL, Los Almos or MIT partnerships…
3/3
One concern, just like with the CIA overseas deaths, was if Trump had sold off classified information of top credentialed scientists to foreign adversaries.
Because 11 JPL/NASA/Los Alamos top scientists had all died or disappeared under mysterious circumstances while working on alternative energy research.
This is a *VERY* weird overlap giving that story has been in the press the past few weeks.