I am not grasping at straws to make this connection. It must be understood that ecology, is the relationship and interdependence of everything. The human economy isn't separate from it, it is a part of it.
2/
Some of the connections are obvious. Food prices have sharply risen, often because of "extreme weather", which is a euphemism for climate change, as there is no weather, independent of the climate, which is just the accumulation of weather patterns over time.
3/
I'm not really sure how the media and politicians get away with talking about extreme weather events, without mentioning climate change, other than it is obvious they are trying to gaslight the public and fear the public demanding climate action.
4/
Ecological impacts, manifest themselves through long causal chains, where the causes of the impacts is not at all obvious. I will give a simple explanation, although it is unbelievably complex.
5/
Natural ecosystems take thousands of years to develop, with myriad feedback loops evolving. The capitalist industrial system has only existed for 250 or so years, and much of it is far more recent. It was implemented with little thought for the long term consequences.
6/
The capitalist industrial system relies on constant, unnatural economic growth. If economic growth just falters slightly, not stops, it seriously disrupts the whole economy and financial system.
7/
But no natural ecosystem has a perpetual inbuilt growth system. If an ecosystem or living system has a continuous growing component, such as a cancer, or invasive species out of control, the whole system is thrown out of kilter.
8/
In natural systems, sustained growth is always followed by collapse, the most simply and easy to understand feedback loop, which maintains homeostasis. Ecosystems have a type of homeostasis, not just individual organisms.
In the industrialist, capitalist system, collapse is averted by constantly expanding into ecological niches, occupied by other species. Self-evidently, this can't be sustained as you can't have infinite growth in a finite system.
10/
Initially, the free market system, has a tendency to bring prices and costs down, but this is time-limited. If food, or any other natural commodity, becomes limited, supply and demand dictates that prices start to rise as demand increases and supply is restricted.
11/
The free market, capitalist-industrial system, increases demand for natural commodities that are limited. Our whole economy is totally sustained by natural ecosystems, which we are systematically destroying to create more and faster growth.
12/
A cost of living crisis is an inevitable consequence, of trying to maintain eternal, maximum growth, in a finite system. Where the free market system, no longer brings prices and costs down, and it increases prices.
13/
As climate impacts get more severe, it will cause increasing difficulties with food production, causing food shortages, and food inflation. It is not theoretical, it is actually happening, now.
The lack of joined up thinking is incredible, in not just the new UK government, now headed by Andy Burnham, but around the world, where politicians naively think they can address the cost of living crisis, without addressing the climate and ecological crisis.
16/
It is generally agreed, that the climate and ecological emergency, will lead to future food shortages, not in the distant future, but in the forthcoming years. In a free market system, shortages of a commodity, lead to rapidly increasing prices i.e. a cost of living crisis.
17/
I come back to my original proposition, that the cost of living crisis = the climate and ecological crisis. It is the UK's intelligence services, warning of future food shortages, which means food hyperinflation, not @ExtinctionR.
18/
It is smoke and mirrors for politicians and economists to pretend that they can address the cost of living crisis, without addressing the climate and ecological crisis, and major system change, to the system driving the climate and ecological crisis.
19/
Trump, MAGA, and the other right wing populist idiocy, is magical thinking, to try and overcome this fundamental flaw in the current business as usual model. Trump et al, are an ecological consequence.
20/
"Burnham to say UK must be honest about its challenges as he prepares to become PM"
The why isn't Andy Burnham being honest about the climate and ecological emergency, and the serious challenges it poses to the UK?
"as he prepares to introduce measures to ease the cost of living and allow more North Sea fossil fuel drilling." theguardian.com/politics/2026/…
1/5🧵
After all this report is by the UK Intelligence Services and is on the UK Govt website.
"Global ecosystem degradation and collapse threaten UK national security and prosperity. The world is already experiencing impacts including crop failures, intensified natural disasters and infectious disease outbreaks."
Look at the dates given, this is not some far off future threat.
"The resilience of human systems to ecosystem degradation is moderately uncertain and the wider geopolitical context out to 2030 and 2050 is highly uncertain." gov.uk/government/pub…
2/5
Then there is potential AMOC collapse, driven by climate change, which would make agriculture in Northern Europe, including the UK, all but impossible. Along with other major climate impacts.
"May and June heatwaves killed about 2,700 people in England and Wales, data suggests"
There is profound misunderstanding about the climate crisis, because we have seen nothing yet, if politicians had taken the action they promised 33 years ago, we would not be in this situation.
Let's get this clear, our political leaders are wholly responsible for the climate emergency. They were the only people with the power to take action, and they repeatedly promised to take action, and then failed to take that action.
The public are not to blame.
2/
I hear lots of people blaming the public. This is entirely misguided. The majority of the public have been in favour of climate action since the late 1980s. This is a verifiable fact, and it is why our scheming politicians promised action.
Sometimes I think I'm the only person who can remember what was said and happened a few years ago. As I said in the post I linked to, I attended a seminar about the then recent 1992 Rio Earth Summit, just months after it.
The senior scientist who was the chair, and how wrote the standard text book at the time on air pollution and climate change, said "now we know what the problem is, we can solve it"
In the last 50+ years, mainstream politicians, obsessed with economic growth use the same dishonest trick to defeat taking action on the environment. They pledge to take action, and when they think everyone has forgotten about what they pledged, they renege on their pledges.
1/🧵
All climate activists/environmentalists need to be aware of this, because mainstream economic growth obsessed politicians, have consistently used the same deceitful dishonesty, over and again. I'm not aware of any political pledge on the environment, that has been honoured.
3/
There's almost a 100% record, of politicians and governments, never honouring their pledges on the environment. In every instance, politicians and governments, subsequently renege on pledges they make, on climate change, biodiversity loss, and environmental protection.
4/
The crucial issue is where, that is not a managed grouse moor, has there been an example, where culling Foxes and Crows, alone, resulted in a clear difference to Curlew breeding success?
I mean, it has been tried, so where has it worked?
At the very best @TonyJuniper is ecologically naive, and is being manipulated by grouse shooting interests, into believing that the breeding success of Curlews on grouse moors, can be replicated elsewhere, with predator control.
1/🧵
I have provided a comprehensive explanation as to why it is false and naive to believe that the breeding successes of Curlews and other ground nesting waders, on managed grouse moors, can be replicated elsewhere, for a number of factors.
Part of the reason, this can't be replicated, as I explain, is because upland grouse moors naturally support far lower numbers of Crows and Foxes, as sheep are generally excluded from them, and there would be very little to support, their populations all year round.
3/