1/ A rare Russian armoured assault on 22 June ended in disaster, with the loss of numerous vehicles and the reported deaths of scores of Russians. Russian warbloggers are scathing about the losses, seeing the attack as incompetent. ⬇️
https://x.com/bayraktar_1love/status/2080974342960062822?s=20
2/ FT military correspondent Andrey Filatov is highly critical, using a standard euphemism for the Russian army to evade censorship:
3/ "The enemy's video report is all standard fare: analog FPV, fiber optics, Mavics. The new thing is a strike wing approaching a stationary "shed" [turtle tank] All these threats can be worked on, but they're not for the brilliant commanders of the Laotian army...
4/ "And remember the "triumphant breakthrough" there? And how are things going?...
Basically, some unit received equipment, personnel, and decided to form... columns.
Basically, some unit received equipment, personnel, and decided to form... columns.
5/ "Was reconnaissance conducted? Engineering reconnaissance? Reconnaissance based on the number of crews the swine have? I'm pretty sure not. And what was the calculation based on? Mass? Like we have more people than they have drones?...
6/ "This is for conversations with idiots who are all for mass, but without reconnaissance.
Of course, the command staff is not held accountable for such a waste of personnel and equipment, so there's no need to think about it.
Of course, the command staff is not held accountable for such a waste of personnel and equipment, so there's no need to think about it.
7/ "[They say] 'The job is done,' beg for personnel and equipment until the next attempt. They don't even form columns themselves... valuable specialists, damn it...
8/ "Just to understand. South of this salient, in 2025, one unit suffered no losses from FPV drones and advanced more effectively than all the others.
9/ "In response, the enemy expanded fibre optics in that direction, made significant inroads into non-standard frequencies, and actively advanced in their "strike wings."
10/ "What kind of systemic response do we have? There isn't one... only cries of "Forward!" and piss in the ears at all levels."
Anatoly Radov is also critical:
Anatoly Radov is also critical:
11/ "A massive attack is, in principle, another attempt to make a quick splash, which seems odd in the fifth year of the war. And it's generally odd to spend months spamming fighters one or two at a time, then gather the men and advance in a column.
12/ "And the most absurd thing is that this attack didn't advance beyond the already liberated territories.
Also, the transfer of some of the 90th Division's fighters there perfectly explains the current mess in the Poddubne area and the surrounding area.
Also, the transfer of some of the 90th Division's fighters there perfectly explains the current mess in the Poddubne area and the surrounding area.
13/ "In other words, they considered taking Dobropillya a more important objective. And they most likely considered it a more important objective because on certain maps, it's been ours since that offensive. After all, the Ministry of Defence doesn't draw it [as enemy territory].
14/ "On the bright side, the Ukrainian Armed Forces, of course, greatly exaggerated the number of vehicles used and destroyed in the video. A total of 11 armoured fighting vehicles, including tanks, were used, 10 of which were destroyed." /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
