Seth Abramson Profile picture
Jan 8, 2018 24 tweets 5 min read Read on X
(THREAD) So Mueller wants to question Trump. Here are 20 questions he'd likely ask about the possibility of a pre-inauguration conspiracy involving Trump and Russia—one of many topics he'd inquire about. (Other topics, like Obstruction or Money Laundering, are a separate matter.)
NOTE #1: Each of these questions stands in for a sequence of 25 to 50 questions on the topic described. We'd expect Mueller to have over 1,000 questions—literally—he wants to ask the president across all topics. That's why Trump's lawyers will try to limit—or *avoid*—questioning.
NOTE #2: Note that these questions would all be phrased differently than they are here, depending upon Mueller's prior knowledge of the topic at issue. Cross-examination-style questioning involves making statements "at" a witness that force from him or her a "yes" or "no" answer.
1. Did you have any conversations with Russian nationals about the selection process for the 2002 Miss Universe pageant—either before or after that pageant—and if so, when were those conversations, and with whom, and on what specific subtopics?
2. In the year before or after after Mr. Sater entered your business circle—following the 2002 pageant, at which a woman linked romantically to Putin was crowned Miss Universe—did he make any reference to the pageant, or to any Russian national you'd ever previously spoken with?
3. Pursuant to your involvement with the 2002 Miss Universe pageant, did you *attempt* to make contact with Vladimir Putin, any agent of the Kremlin, or any Russian national—besides Oxana Fedorova—before or after the pageant? (Note: the 2002 pageant was held in Puerto Rico.)
4. At any point during your long business relationship with Sater, did he a) make promises of being able to introduce you to Putin or Putin allies, or b) make promises of being able to help you establish new business deals in Russia, not merely with Russian oligarchs in America?
5. Did you ever pass messages to, or receive messages from, Vladimir Putin, or any Kremlin agent, as a result of business dealings you had with Mr. Sater between 2002 and the present, or as a result of any business dealings with Russians you sought out of your own accord?
6. Have you ever used any family member or Trump Organization employee to pass messages to a third party that you intended to reach Vladimir Putin or Kremlin agents, whether these messages were related to business transactions or not?
7. Have you yourself *ever* had any direct or indirect contact with Vladimir Putin, either through text, email, phone, speakerphone, fax, third-party intermediary, or any other form of communication that would enable you to send and/or receive messages from the Russian president?
8. (A similar series of questions related specifically to Trump's real estate dealings in Panama, his sales of Florida properties to Russian oligarchs, his involvement with Russian partners in MMA venture M-1 Global, and Trump SoHo—as well as any other Russian-partner ventures.)
9. Did you discuss with either of the Agalarovs, or any of their agents, any aspect of a potential Trump Tower Moscow deal prior to arriving in Moscow in November 2013, and if so where and when did these conversations occur, who was involved, and what details did they entail?
10. While in Moscow in 2013, did you meet with any person—Russian national or otherwise—who indicated to you that they were acting on Vladimir Putin's behalf, carrying a message or gift from Mr. Putin, or were in any way dealing with you with the intention of pleasing Mr. Putin?
11. Did you sign a letter-of-intent to build Trump Tower Moscow at any point in 2013, and if so, when and where, and with whom, and using what prior Russian funding and permits authorizations? (Note: one would, of course, also want to know the names of all Trump agents involved.)
12. Have you ever had an extra-marital encounter in either Moscow or St. Petersburg, Russia, or been engaged in any encounter—sexual or otherwise—involving prostitutes, escorts, or other women "provided" (in any sense) by a Russian national, in those two locations or any others?
13. Who accompanied you to each event or location—whether morning or evening, official or unofficial, Russian or American or another nationality—you were at, however briefly, during your November 2013 trip to Moscow?
14. Have you ever had any interaction, direct or indirect, with any of the following individuals—Artem Klyushin, Konstantin Rykov, Dmitry Peskov, Oleg Deripaska, Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, [20 to 50 additional persons]—at any point in the last five years, on any subject?
15. In meeting Sergey Lavrov and Sergey Kislyak in the Oval, did you discuss any of these: Trump Tower Moscow; other past or potential business deals the Trump Organization has sought/had in Russia; the Rosneft oil sale; energy profit-sharing; or nuclear tech in the Middle East?
16. What role—in terms of meetings, memos and other contacts, as well as the quantity and quality of same—did the following individuals play in your campaign, with what start and end dates: Erik Prince, Roger Stone, Mike Flynn, Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, [20 to 50 others].
17. What was the nature of your involvement—dates and times of contact, length of contact, documents reviewed or signed, meetings held or briefed on—regarding the 2015 Sater/Cohen effort to close a Trump Tower Moscow deal, or their 2017 transmission of the Artemenko "peace" deal?
18. Did you order—directly or indirectly—Sessions, Page, Papadopoulos, Stone, Bannon, Clovis, Schmitz, Flynn, Prince, Kushner, Gordon, Don Jr., McFarland, Burt, MacFarlane, or anyone associated with your campaign to negotiate *any* issue with a Russian national pre-inauguration?
19. Did any of the aforementioned individuals, or any person connected to your campaign prior to, at, or after the time such contact occurred, indicate to you that—with or without your consent—they'd engaged in negotiations on *any* issue with a Russian national pre-inauguration?
20. Did you authorize—by word or deed, directly or indirectly—any of these: Kislyak's invitation to the Mayflower; Papadopoulos' invite to edit your Mayflower speech; Page's Moscow trip; Papadopoulos' trip to Greece; Kushner's pursuit of a Kremlin backchannel via a Russian SCIF?
BONUS. At any point pre-inauguration, did you receive any oral, written, or other notice that any member of your campaign or family had had contact with a Russian national—whether on a business, personal, or political topic—that has not already been disclosed in public testimony?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

Apr 25
(THREAD) I’m a Trump biographer and presidential historian who’s also a NYT-bestselling journalist covering the criminal trial of Donald Trump on 34 felonies in New York.

This thread explains why I’m warning people to be careful about assuming David Pecker’s testimony is true. Image
1/ For the full PROOF report, see below. The first two sections are free, the remainder free with the trial offer at the link. The report title: “What Longtime Trump Associate Pecker Doesn’t Want to Discuss Involves a Plot to Steal the 2016 Election.”

🔗: sethabramson.substack.com/p/what-longtim…
Image
2/ I’ll start with the CNN summary below. It covers the part of the Pecker testimony today involving topics neither Pecker *nor Trump* want the public to properly understand. The Pecker testimony on Stormy Daniels is actually much *less* charged, because Pecker was less involved. Image
Read 43 tweets
Apr 25
The Supreme Court of the United States is literally deciding today whether Donald Trump can legally have them all executed on January 20, 2025, and the upshot I get from major media updates from inside the courtroom is that they are taking a serious look at it

America is over
One justice said—apparently without breaking out in maniacal laughter and requiring a straitjacket—that it may not be fair to a POTUS to judge his motive when he engages in an act

“Mens rea” has only been one half the analysis of whether a crime has been committed for 500 years
This country has descended into absolute madness and I think it is really important that journalists do absolutely nothing to normalize it

What is happening at the Supreme Court today is not normal or okay or consistent with American traditions in any respect
Read 5 tweets
Apr 23
You’re getting *very warm*, James.

I said that this criminal trial is very much about illegal election interference, and I meant it. Per usual, the good guys are only telling about 10% of the story in order to not ruffle feathers. But America deserves the full truth about this.
Keep in mind Cohen didn't front the money to AMI for these ops. Not only did AMI outlay cash on the front end as Trump was ramping up his whirlwind introduction of Pecker to his Saudi pals, but there were times the cost was so high AMI balked. Then... suddenly they had the money.
The Saudis went almost directly from their meeting with Donald Trump Jr. in Trump Tower—where they asked the Trump family exactly how they could help illegally steal the election for Trump—to AMI, with whom they immediately developed a highly lucrative relationship (...for AMI).
Read 13 tweets
Apr 21
(🔐) PROOF EXCLUSIVE: The Top 25 Issues With Trump’s $175M Bond—All Listed Here—Don’t Include the Two New Ones That Have Arisen Just Hours Before a Hearing That Could Determine the Future of His Empire

🔗:

It is so much worse than you thought. Please RT. sethabramson.substack.com/p/proof-exclus…
Image
1/ Most people have no idea how many problems there are with this bond.
2/ Most people do not realize that, even with Trump’s criminal trial starting in earnest tomorrow, the hearing with longer-term consequences happening in New York may well be Trump’s *civil* hearing (which he will not be able to attend). And there’s a very good reason for this.
Read 27 tweets
Apr 18
BREAKING NEWS: Kremlin Asset Paul Manafort Confirms He is Already Working on Donald Trump’s 2024 Campaign, Meaning Vladimir Putin Again Has a Direct Line to Trump As Trump’s Allies in Congress Pull Out Every Stop Conceivable to Aid the Kremlin in Its Monstrous Invasion of Europe
Read 4 tweets
Apr 18
Many Americans don’t know that, in legal shorthand, a criminal defendant is represented by the “Delta” symbol, a triangle (∆).

(Yes—really.)

Less well known—but now, due to the Trump trial, just as relevant—is the “sleeping defendant” symbol: a faded, sideways triangle (▷).
When a criminal defendant is awake but angry at having to face consequences for his crimes, it’s OK to use the Red Delta (🔺).

If a defendant is—like Trump—livid at facing consequences *and* “sundowning” during afternoon court sessions, use the *inverted* Red Delta instead (🔻).
What about a criminal defendant who’s at once feeling “sad,” “tired,” and “boxed in” by virtue of having to deal with the same criminal procedures as the average American citizen, whom he considers himself far better than? For this we use the rare Recumbent Boxed Blue Delta (▶️).
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(