Three languages could be considered as candidates for the national language of India: 1) English: Pros: language of science/technology. Publishing your paper on your next greates discovery in Hindi or Tamil is not going to get you far. Becoming language of world system. Cons: not
many understand it well in India; language of erstwhile enemy of the Indian people; doesnot capture certain aspects of Indian experience. 2) Hindi; pros: it is the modern successor of the pan-Indian vulgar registers of Aryan speech: modern version of apabhramsha which was once
understood as a pan-Indian language and the prAkR^ita-s at even earlier period. It is a grammatically simpler than most other Indian languages once its logic is correctly taught. Vocabulary mostly pan-Indian. Cons:unfair advantage to northern speakers who are close to it natively
Not language of knowledge, education or having independent technical flourish. schwa deletion is aurally vulgar. 3) Sanskrit; Pros: language of religion, India science, and education. Intimately linked to the identity &unity of the Hindu nation. Sounds good to the ear. Given no
undue advantage to any one group in the country. Learning it can be a character-building experience that helps those with lower mental capacity to at least acquire some sense of educational worth. cons: Difficult grammar, especially when there is a drive to adhere closely to
pANini& his successors in entirity. Good schemes for curricular delivery have not been done for schools though paracurricular systems like SBh might be somewhat better. So I'd say that Skt is the best choice though it will not be without difficulty. I think it needs some course
correction such as willingness to impart in both nAgarI and romanized or other scripts.Willingness to jetision the idiotic fetish for long conjunct words in writing. Deemphasizing kAvya and focussing on prose in practical education. Being lax with more vulgar register of grammar
at least to start with. Of course some who forth in mouth on the TL would suggest the 4th alternative of a cluster of regional tongues. This thread is not about that. The regional tongues should not be imposed left to those who want to preserve them
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In some parts of the world aDNA studies have become a matter of fact tool for reconstructing lost history like this massive study of the Avar Khaghanate individuals from Hungary. Like the earlier study it shows the tale of "Mongols" before the Chingizids nature.com/articles/s4158…
It seems the East Asian component of the Avars in the west can be modeled best with Late Xiongnu& certain Xianbei (Serbi) individuals. We take the Xiongnu to be early members of the Mongolic branch, while as Shimunek demonstrated Xianbei to be early members of the Serbi branch of
Serbi-Mongolian (Serbi = para-Mongolic). When the Serib Khaghanate rose it incorporated several elements of the Xiongnu Hun Shanyuate into it. The Rouran Khaghanate that arose upon the disintegration of the Serbi, it was likely led by a Mongolic group. Even the name Mongol might
The early Arya-s imagined the tumulus (kurgan) as a shelter with the "mother" - i.e. earth. This is clarified in the tR^icha deployed for the funerary rite of the piling of the kurgan, i.e. shmashAna:
uch Chva~nchasva pR^ithivi mA ni bAdhathAH sUpAyanAsmai bhava sUpava~nchanA |
uchChva~nchamAnA pR^ithivI su tiShThatu sahasram mita upa hi shrayantAm |
gR^ihAso ghR^itashchuto bhavantu vishvAhAsmai sharaNAH santv atra ||
~May the earth stand piled high above him; verily upheld by a 1000 props. May it be
the house dripping with ghee; Through eternity may he be sheltered here! Truly that shelter on the steppe has been a great mechanism to understand our pitaraH.
The Israeli program to make best use of the high cognitive capacity of their people
Such a plan might work to some degree even among peoples with much lower pop. density of cognitive capacity but what they may lack is the necessary cohesion
via @Rjrasvapalladiummag.com/2024/01/26/the…
Many of the cognitive elite& their descendants who played a key role in the Soviet Rus programs moved Isr & added mental muscle to their capacity in the 1990s.
I'll mention one admittedly anecdotal case: met an individual who had served in the above. He was politically a mild guy: was ready to concede 2-state solution, wanted to sign treaties with the Mohds, was quite critical of his own politicians etc. An equivalent H guy would be
A 🧵on interdigitation in IE branches. 1 of the offshoots of the recent archaeogenetic work is the developing view that Greek- (Greco-Armenian) sprang directly out of Yamnaya, with Greeks sojourning in the upper Balkans before reaching the peninsula& islands. This is consistent
with certain linguistic (word) trees that favor an early branching of Greek (Greco-Armenian) after the basal most branches Anatolian & Tocharian. But until not long ago there was an alternative or partly overlapping linguistic hypothesis of Greco-Armeno-Aryan. Was that signal
entirely illusory or was there something to it that is still relevant. It has 3 dimensions: 1. Certain isoglosses; 2. Certain literary usages; 3. Certain seemingly apomorphic mythological elements. The linguists who see it as illusory generally take these shared features as
🧵Some "great books" for H educational reading with some comments 1. Excerpts from the 4 shruti-s & their a~Nga-s (I know many would go apoplectic with this suggestion: I see your point) 2. vedA~Nga-jyotiSha with numerical examples& practical observations of the sky
3. kaNAda's sUtra-s w commentarial material 4. excerpts from jaimini' sUtra-s with glosses 5. pata~njali's yogasUtra-s w vyAs-abhAShya 6. excerpts from itihAsa-s & harivaMsha 7. excerpts from proto-skandapurANa 8. readings from mAlinIvijaya, nishvAsa, netra, lakShmI, pauShkara
9. kumArasaMbhava 10. kAmasUtra of vAtsyAyana (I understand some people might object) 11. kauTilIya arthashAstra 12. readings from charaka, sushruta, vAgbhaTa & kAshyapa saMhitA. 13. e.g.s from the AryabhaTIya -- at least work out of kuTTaka & sine tables.
The ancient world, unlike many neo-occidentally conditioned folks, recognized that leadership of men was related to something special -- it could be seen as a the charisma seen only in a true leader. That's why we have approximately equivalent words: Skt: shrI; Iranic: Xvarena,
Turkic: kut, Mongolic: suu, Chinese: yun, Arabic: dawlat. That it cuts across religions and ethnicities in Eurasia indicates that it is something primal.Even the Austronesia Maoris had something called mana. At times of stress nation can only be led by men with that special thing
Despite the neo-occidental conditioning, one can see that the pull of this special charisma exists to date in the west. It is something an oligarchy deep state greatly fears for it would transfer the mandate from their shadow government to the "ekavIra". The word ekavIra is an