Techno Fog Profile picture
May 12, 2018 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Just received the transcript for the May 9, 2018 hearing in the Special Counsel's Russian Troll case.

A few observations on this short hearing. Image
First, the Court goes over the purpose of the hearing:

to conduct an initial appearance and arraignment of defendant Concord Management and Consulting, LLC Image
The Judge brings up Concord Catering, saying the gov't alleges an association with Concord Mgmt.

Attorney for Concord Mgmt:

The gov't has "indicted the proverbial ham sandwich."

"That company didn't exist as a legal entity during the time period alleged by the gov't." Image
THe Judge goes through the typical arraignment process, asking if Concord
Mgmt understands it has been charged with conspiracy to defraud the US.

He also notes the potential $500K+ fine. No jail time for Concord.

Special Counsel could be embarrassed over such small stakes. ImageImage
Special Counsel Rhee gets up, saying the gov't understands that
Concord Mgmt's attorney was also to represent Concord Catering

Judge: "What would you me to do with that here today?" He says he's not
authorized to represent them

Rhee: Ok, we'll serve them with summons Image
Judge goes back to the lawyer for Concord.

Lawyer: "We know that the special counsel apparently has access to our confidential filings at the Office of Foreign Assets control, which in and of itself is a disturbing fact." Image
Done w/ the formalities, Concord's lawyer waives the reading of the indictment and enters a plea of not guilty.

"We exercise our right to a speedy trial." Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Techno Fog

Techno Fog Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Techno_Fog

Feb 8
Special Counsel Robert Hur's report has been released.

"Biden willfully retained" marked and unmarked classified documents at his home.

This "risked serious damage to America's national security"

Yet Biden will not be charged.

Here are the highlights 🧵 Image
There are tapes: in 2017, Biden told a writer he "found all the classified stuff downstairs" at his Delaware home.

These documents were later found by the FBI.

Hur: this evidence shows "Biden willfully retained the marked classified documents about Afghanistan."
Image
Image
There is also evidence that Biden:

- Unlawfully retained classified notebooks post-Vice Presidency.

- Disclosed classified info in his notebooks to his ghostwriter. Image
Read 9 tweets
Feb 2
Fulton County DA and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade admit to a "personal relationship"

It started in 2022 - long before Trump's 2023 indictment.

The travel paid by Wade? It was from "personal funds" - not the ~$700K he was paid by Fulton County. lol.
Image
Image
Wade's claim that Willis never received "funds or personal financial gain" from his position is misleading.

It dances around the truth - that Willis received extravagant gifts from her Special Prosecutor.

Gifts she never reported to Fulton County, as required by law.
Image
Image
Willis demands no evidentiary hearing - obviously concerned about herself and Wade (and members of their staff) from testifying. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 5
More Jeffrey Epstein documents have been unsealed -

Adriana Ross (John Doe) removed computers from Epstein's Palm Beach mansion before the FBI could search the premises.

Thread. Image
Lawyers for Virginia Giuffre were seeking Ghislaine Maxwell's communications with Bill Clinton and Hillary ClintonImage
2006 Notes from the Palm Beach PD's Jeffrey Epstein files:

"Abigail Wexner - wants to talk to you @ something private"

She's the wife of Epstein client Leslie Wexner. Image
Read 17 tweets
Jan 4
NEW:

More Jeffrey Epstein files have been unsealed.

Starting with the testimony of a minor who was abused by Epstein.

Thread. Image
Here we see the addition of other John Does and witnesses (some new) -

All with potential knowledge of "Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein's sexual trafficking"

Bill Clinton
Doug Band (Clinton advisor)
Prince Andrew
Sophie BiddleImage
Image
Image
Image
More on Bill Clinton - and his threats to a publisher to protect Epstein (and thus himself).

"B. Clinton walked into [Vanity Fair] and threatened them not to write sex-trafficing articles about his good friend" Jeffrey Epstein. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 3
The Jeffrey Epstein files have been unsealed. We have the documents

Here are the most important John Does.

We start with Bill Clinton - John Doe #36 - whose deposition was essential to provide info on his relationship with Maxwell and Epstein

Thread. Image
Testimony from one witness:

Q: "Did Jeffrey ever talk to you about Bill Clinton?"

A: "He said one time that Clinton likes them young, referring to girls."

👀 Image
Note - there are more batches of documents that haven't been uploaded by the Giuffre/Maxwell attorneys.

Pardon any delay; many documents relate to John Does who were merely witnesses or doctors.

(The influencers and media lied to you about many John Does.)

See photo below. Image
Read 10 tweets
Dec 19, 2023
A federal judge has ordered the unsealing of 167 Jeffrey Epstein “John Does” (from Ghislaine Maxwell’s civil case).

There’s a lot of confusion (and bad info from the media) surrounding this issue – here is some necessary context on the John Does.

Thread. Image
We previously charted and categorized each John Doe, and previously summarized this material back in Feb. 2023.

The majority (around 100 of 167) have been identified.

Approximately 11 of the unidentified John Does are victims.

Here are examples:
Image
Image
Furthermore -

Lawyers for Maxwell and Giuffre (the victim) informed the Court that quite a few of the John Does were only mentioned in passing or in a benign context.

Or that “the sealed material as to this individual is not salacious.”

Examples: Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(