🧵🪡Number 1

A Call for Reform: Patriotism and Accountability🚨

👉🏻 First off, let me make something absolutely clear: I am not anti-government. I am not an extremist. I do not hate our federal agencies or our federal government. However, I firmly believe that our government agencies can—and must—be reformed.

I believe that when we, the people, come together and make informed decisions—when we start voting in the right individuals (a topic for another thread), as we did with President Trump—we can initiate meaningful reforms in the agencies that are in desperate need of restructuring or, in some cases, potential abolishment.

Now, let me be clear about what I mean by that. Suggesting that some agencies may need to be abolished does not make me an extremist.

It does not make me a danger to my country. It makes me a patriot who cares deeply about identifying and solving the systemic problems within our nation.

I will not tolerate narratives that try to paint me as anything other than someone committed to the well-being of my country.

This is not about clicks, likes, or subscribers. I am not here to play games. These are real issues that we, as Americans, must confront.

We have to face these challenges head-on, identify the problems, and hold accountable those who are stakeholders in these issues.

Fear will not help us,

ignorance will only prolong the suffering.

We cannot afford to ignore the weaponization of our government against its people.

What happened on January 6th, the relentless lawfare against President Trump, the attempted assassinations we know of—and likely many more we don’t—along with incidents like the targeting of General Flynn since at least 2012, are symptoms of a deeper rot that must be addressed.

Reform starts with truth.

Truth requires brass (00)
(you know what I mean).

It begins with honesty and transparency—honesty with ourselves,

with our fellow countrymen,

and about the reality around us.

These principles are not just lofty ideals; they are the foundation of meaningful change.

Together, we must demand accountability, refuse to be silenced by fear, and commit to restoring our nation’s integrity.

This is our responsibility as patriots,

as citizens,

and as Americans.

🤜🏻Now let’s get real…

🚨Why isn’t anyone, aside from a very few, speaking out against the tyranny and overreach of our so-called premier model law-enforcement agency?

🚨WHY ARE SO CALLED “PATRIOTS” TRYING TO BLAIM REAL PATRIOTS!?😡

Not only was Pelosi responsible for providing oversight to the Capitol Police Board and the Sergeant at Arms—all of whom failed miserably, which I will detail in a moment—but the federal bureau of investigation’s role in the grand scheme of intelligence gathering and disseminating information is deeply troubling.

This is critically important as we move on:

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
Accountability cannot exist in a vacuum; it requires a clear framework of laws, policies, doctrine, and rules to measure actions against and enforce consequences.

Without understanding the process, accountability becomes meaningless—a hollow gesture lost to uncertainty and chaos.
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

Without further ado—and as much as I know some of you don’t like my long posts—@13thKai 😜you’re going to want to read this.

Let me show you this process. This process does not require special knowledge, nor am I extraordinary for bringing it to light.

However, it does require effort—effort dedicated to understanding and learning this process. At times, it can be confusing or even misleading, but persistence always pays off.

Our journey today will begin with:

Understanding Intellegence gathering framework related to federal agencies,

Intelligence Framework
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Constitution..
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Bill of Rights..
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Federal Statutes
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Acts
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Presidential Directives
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
National Policies
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Executive Orders
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
National Strategies
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Doctrine
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Operational Framework
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Standard Operating Procedure’s
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Coordination Frameworks
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Agency Policy’s

Let’s break this down, and yes, this absolutely applies to January 6th, observe… this is how @Jeremibullfrog2 and I research… in a nutshell….

If Trumps followers were deemed as Terrorists why did Pelosi not posture security to address her claims??
🤔🫣 Comparitive Analysis

Expected Outcome>>>Actual Outcome=Failure points

Failure Points>>>Statements Made>>Actions=Motive

Motive=Tactics........

Information>>>Intellegence=Specific Actionable Threats

Can the FBI (or any federal agency just roll up on the Capital's Police Jurisdiction?? No..

Can the National Guard just roll up unto Capital Police Jurisdiction? No.

Many failure points, either way, procedurally, policy wise, legally>>>>>Nancy Pelosi IS/WAS RESPONSIBLE! FACT!!

In my article, which I’ll post at the end of this, I explore the structure and history of non-governmental organizations, coined and institutionalized by the UN Charter in Chapter 71 in 1945.

When Jeremiah first told me about this, I didn’t fully understand the scope of what he was describing. He said,

“Bro, the term NGO was coined by the UN in 1945.”

I hadn’t realized that, beyond coining the term, the UN essentially legitimized and embedded NGOs into international operations that would bleed excessive influence on American politics. It’s time we change that. But we can’t change, but we don’t know.

The influence NGOs wield today is astonishing, especially given their pivotal role in shaping policies and public opinion. But now, we need to confront the darker side. Trillions of dollars have flowed to thousands of humanitarian NGOs, yet their track records are, quite frankly, dismal and demand the deepest scrutiny.

Let’s examine in detail how they serve various interests. This will be a long but essential and thorough exploration. To give some perspective, when I teach new bomb technicians about search techniques, I always tell them that when they spot an IED threat, they need to stop focusing on it and start looking for the next one. There’s never just one. Two is one, one is none..

NGOs operate in much the same way—you can’t think of them as a single entity. Instead, they’re more like an interconnected ecosystem of alliances, foundations, and advocacy groups that reinforce and benefit each other in a highly structured and intentional way.

You can find a good example of this in my article detailing the relationships NGOs have with each other. However, one thing people often overlook, even though we know it happens, is just how crucial NGOs are to various powerful entities. Let’s start with corporations—if NGOs didn’t exist, how much harder would it be for corporations to influence American politics?

This Thread will be quite long. But I think you all will want to read it. This thread comes from both @Jeremibullfrog2 and myself.

With elections just around the corner, I don’t want to distract from the critical work needed to save this nation. However, I feel compelled to bring up a topic that may have already been discussed, and perhaps I missed it: J6.

Many of you know that I’m not one to entertain conspiracy theories, a term coined by the CIA. I see things in more black-and-white terms — either something is a conspiracy, a theory or a fact.

Combining terms like conspiracy and theory only confuses the topic or incident and makes no logical sense. But that’s just me.

After reviewing hours of video footage from the January 6th so-called insurrection, I have some serious concerns. But before diving into those, I always like to look at history when researching events like this. Has there been historical precedent for incidents or actions similar to what we witnessed on January 6th?

Questions for this event that I asked myself is:

1. Has a government entity, agency, or institution in the past ever coordinated, conducted, or carried out civil unrest like what we saw on January 6th?

2. Have there been corporate or private entities that have conducted planned, coordinated actions similar to what we saw on January 6th?

3. Specifically, has there ever been a planned civil unrest or insurrectionist event designed to maintain political power or prevent a particular administration or entity from either gaining or sustaining power?

I want to emphasize the importance of understanding that I am approaching this thoughtfully and with a structured approach, using proven logic and methods I’ve successfully applied in the past.

When analyzing events like January 6, motive is an essential factor to consider. As a Master Explosive Ordnance Disposal Warfare Specialist, I’ve learned that understanding motive is key in predicting behaviors. In explosive terrorism, for example, knowing the motive behind an attack allows me to determine where devices will be placed, their complexity, and their magnitude. By identifying the motive, I can anticipate actions and outcomes with a higher degree of accuracy.

The same principle applies when assessing events that involve harm to society, groups, or individuals. Motive helps us determine who benefits, what the goal is, and how these factors align with the actions we observe on the ground. By analyzing these elements, we can understand why certain decisions were made and how events unfolded. With that approach in mind, here are the questions we need to consider:

Who Benefits?

The key to understanding any event like January 6 is identifying who truly benefitted from the chaos. We must ask: How did various individuals, groups, or institutions gain from the situation? If Trump and his supporters did not ultimately benefit—given the backlash and widespread condemnation—then it’s essential to explore whether other groups could have leveraged the unrest to discredit the movement or shift public perception.

What Was the Goal?

Looking at the tactical actions observed on January 6, it becomes clear that some individuals had more specific goals than simply protesting. The level of coordination, the use of certain tactics, and the organized nature of some actions suggest that there were objectives beyond spontaneous rioting.

If the goal was to disrupt the certification process or to create enough chaos to justify a broader crackdown, then it’s plausible that coordinated groups were involved in pushing the situation beyond what the average protester intended. This deeper goal would imply that the event was not simply a failed protest but rather part of a broader, more calculated strategy.

Predictability of Actions:

Understanding predictability through motive is critical. Groups motivated by chaos or political instability may not care about long-term outcomes, instead focusing on creating a violent spectacle that draws attention and provokes strong reactions. Their actions are typically erratic but designed to escalate violence or tension.

In contrast, groups motivated by long-term control or political discreditation would likely focus on orchestrating key elements (e.g., escalating violence, targeting law enforcement, breaching high-profile locations) in a way that influences public opinion and drives specific narratives. This predictability, driven by motive, helps us see patterns in their actions, making it possible to anticipate their next moves or understand their broader strategy.

And so our journey begins..

🚨 THREAD: From Foster Care to the Border—The Same Corrupt NGOs Are Failing Our Most Vulnerable Kids 🚨

🧵 It Doesn’t Stop at the Border.
These NGOs that are making millions off disaster relief and immigration shelters? They’re also deeply involved in domestic foster care systems, using government grants to partner with Child Protective Services (CPS). But the same issues—corruption, abuse, and mismanagement—are showing up in foster care as well. Let’s dig into it.
👇
#BrokenSystem 2/ Southwest Key Programs isn’t just housing migrant children at the border. They’ve received millions in government funding to operate in the foster care system too! And guess what? Just like at the border, there are reports of abuse, neglect, and poor oversight within their foster care programs.

😡 #FosterCareFail

🚨 THREAD: What They’re NOT Telling You About the U.S. Border Humanitarian Crisis 🚨

🧵 The Border Crisis Is Big Business for NGOs
Many of the same organizations managing disaster relief are ALSO running shelters and services for migrant children. 💰 These NGOs receive millions in federal contracts, but where’s the oversight? Case in point: Southwest Key Programs—raking in $1.7 billion since 2014, yet plagued with abuse scandals.

#BorderMoneyMachine 2/ Follow the Money 💵
Family Endeavors, a lesser-known NGO, was awarded $86M in a no-bid contract to provide services to migrant families. Shortly after, whistleblowers reported rampant mismanagement. And the CEO? He’s pocketing a six-figure salary while children are kept in horrible conditions. 🤯

This by far is the most networked shit show I’ve seen yet… there’s a lot!!

The BCFS Health and Human Services financials provided show significant interconnections with other entities under its umbrella, including FirstDay Foundation, which is the parent organization. Several related entities are mentioned, some of which are notable for receiving or transferring funds among them:

Key Related Entities:

1.FirstDay Foundation: The parent company of BCFS. It oversees and manages various other affiliated entities. Financial transfers and oversight are handled by FirstDay.

2.Compass Connections: A child-based service organization, another affiliated entity that is involved in emergency management and services for at-risk children.

3.Children’s Emergency Relief International: Focused on child-based services, likely in conjunction with BCFS’s focus on children in crisis situations.

4.Breckenridge Village: Provides adult care services, adding another layer of human services within the BCFS network.

5.Emergency Management and Response: A separate entity dealing with emergency services, mirroring the broader mission of BCFS to handle mass care and disaster response.

Financial Transfers:

•Intercompany transfers are noted between these entities, with significant sums moved between BCFS and FirstDay Foundation, along with Compass Connections and other subsidiaries. One example from the document shows a $28.3 million net transfer to a related party, indicating these entities may function as a coordinated financial ecosystem.

•FirstDay Foundation, as the parent company, likely plays a central role in financial management and strategic oversight across all BCFS-related entities, particularly in large-scale federal contracts.

Lobbying and Revenue Concerns:

Given BCFS’s extensive involvement in federal contracts and government programs, there have been historical concerns about the transparency of revenue flow, especially since some funds are funneled through these related entities.

As mentioned, FirstDay Foundation’s leadership oversees significant contracts, and the existence of multiple related entities may allow for financial cross-pollination, which complicates accountability and raises potential questions about how funds are utilized across nonprofit and for-profit lines.

ProPublica and USASpending document how BCFS and related entities receive millions in federal funding, particularly through contracts with the Department of Health and Human Services for managing UAC shelters. Let’s break down the specific numbers, names, and associations across the BCFS Health and Human Services network and its affiliates, as well as their financial interrelations and federal contracts. Here is a batch-by-batch analysis based on the provided data and documents:

1. BCFS Health and Human Services:

•Revenue: $871 million (from the latest available year).
•Parent Company: FirstDay Foundation.

Key Executives:
•Kevin Dinnin: Chairman of the Board (BCFS and FirstDay Foundation).

•Claudia Oliveira: Treasurer, overseeing financial operations across entities.

•Sonya Thompson: Executive Director.

Major Contracts:

•Krucial Staffing LLC (Contract Labor): $572,488.
•True Grit Parent Holdings Inc.: $28,403,705 (contract labor).

2. FirstDay Foundation (Parent Organization):

Key Affiliates:

•Compass Connections (affiliated with BCFS): $7,730,357 (book value listed).

•Breckenridge Village: $2,341,584 (listed under FirstDay’s financial structure).

•Transfers and Associations:

•Net Transfer to Related Party: $28.3 million (this could represent intercompany transfers between FirstDay and its related entities like BCFS).

•FirstDay Foundation handles administrative and financial oversight for all BCFS affiliates.

3. Compass Connections:

•Revenue: Significant funds passed through this entity, notably linked to services for UAC shelters and federal contract management.

Affiliations:
•Listed as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit under FirstDay Foundation.

•Receives funds from federal contracts allocated for migrant care and disaster services.

4. Additional Contract Labor:

•Coastal Cloud Holdings LLC: $2,163,360 (contract labor).

•Husch Blackwell LLP: $348,846 (legal services).

•BDO USA LLP: $325,197 (consulting services).

5. Key Directors with Overlapping Roles:

•George Cowden: Vice-Chair/Secretary (also receiving legal compensation from related organizations).

•Edward Lanier Hall: Director (involved in multiple BCFS-related entities).

•Janet Littlejohn: Director (affiliated with BCFS and related entities under FirstDay).

•David Sprouse: Director (connected to the overarching board of BCFS and FirstDay).

•Kenneth Kemp: Director (affiliated across multiple entities).

6. Financial and Organizational Relationships:

•BCFS and its affiliates show substantial intercompany transfers, including loans payable, which further integrate their finances.

•BCFS Emergency Management: Handles federal contracts related to emergency management, such as the large contracts awarded for UAC shelters.

Associations and Cross-Pollination:

•Executives like Kevin Dinnin and Claudia Oliveira hold overlapping roles in multiple entities, managing both nonprofit and contract-based operations. These shared roles suggest strong financial ties and intercompany resource allocation across nonprofit and for-profit entities.

Oh wait…. There’s more….

I implore and nearly beg you all to pay attention to this thread. I promise you this will be one of the most empowering pieces of information that you’ll ever learn.

Politics. Blah… right?

But what if I told you that politics is the very tool being used to subvert our country, right in front of our eyes?

What if I told you that through the very same political systems we’re told to trust, elections have been legally manipulated for decades, ensuring that power stays in the hands of a select few?

Still think politics sounds “blah”?

Now, imagine this: the elites—those with deep pockets, corporations, NGOs, and special interest groups—use politics not for the common good, but to further their own self-interests.

And the truth is, they heavily rely on one thing: your ignorance. They need you to tune out, to believe that politics is too complicated, too corrupt, or just too boring to care about. Because when you’re disengaged, they can act unchecked, behind the scenes, writing the rules to benefit themselves.

It’s eerily similar to medieval times, where widespread illiteracy kept the masses uninformed. Back then, religious institutions and the ruling class could manipulate and control entire populations simply because people couldn’t read or comprehend what was happening.

Today, instead of illiteracy, it’s political apathy and ignorance. The less you know, the easier it is for the powerful to maintain control, through legal loopholes, secret deals, and a system that seems designed to keep you from understanding how it really works.

The difference now is that the information is available. The challenge is cutting through the noise, learning to see through the spin, and realizing that the system benefits self interest groups and not the American People when you stay distracted or disinterested. Because when you’re not paying attention, they get away with it. I’m going to show you how this system works, and I’m confident that what I’ll reveal will be things you haven’t seen before—or maybe things you’ve heard whispers about but never fully understood.

My goal is simple: to either inform you or, at the very least, help you see the full picture of the American political ecosystem.

I’ll warn you upfront—it may seem vast and overwhelming at first, almost like a tangled web that’s difficult to unravel. But once you start to understand the mechanics of the system, you’ll begin to see how your freedom, your vote, your sovereignty, and your inalienable rights—rights that are supposed to be protected by the Constitution—are being systematically subverted.

And here’s the kicker: it’s all happening legally.

Now, just because something is legal doesn’t make it right. It doesn’t make it moral. But those in power know how to play by the letter of the law, using loopholes, technicalities, and intricate rules that most of us don’t even know exist.

They’re operating in a system that’s been carefully designed to keep the average citizen in the dark, while quietly consolidating power and eroding the very freedoms they claim to protect.

So, my objective here is to pull back the curtain, to reveal the machinery behind the scenes. It’s not just about pointing fingers at politicians or political parties—it’s about understanding the whole ecosystem.

From the corporate lobbyists to the nonprofit organizations, from the media narratives to the legislative loopholes—it all connects. Once you see how the pieces fit together, you’ll begin to understand how the game is rigged, and more importantly, how you’ve been kept from seeing it.

Yes, it may be legal. But that doesn’t mean it’s moral, and it certainly doesn’t mean it’s in your best interest. The time has come to understand the difference and to reclaim what is rightfully yours: your voice, your vote, your freedom.

I know many of us feel that our country is so broken that it’s irrecoverable without intervention from the military or some extraordinary event. But I want to remind those who feel this way of our history—this is not the first time Americans have faced such challenging circumstances. And I would argue the challenges that we are facing now don’t even come close to what generations in the past has endured.

To me, looking back at history is a stern reminder of what’s been sacrificed for our great nation. This nation is not perfect by any means. But it is the will of the American people that make this nation great. If we give up on it now, we only give up on ourselves and past generations that sacrificed so much.

Despite the odds, previous generations used the Constitution to secure their rights. In some cases, they regained rights that had been taken from them, and in other instances, they claimed the rights that were rightfully theirs from the start.

The first example that comes to mind, and the one I think of most often when I feel our government is failing to represent us justly, is the struggle of African Americans during the Civil Rights Movement.

This is a powerful example of this. Despite the overwhelming challenges, African Americans used the Constitution, particularly the 14th and 15th Amendments, as well as the legal system, to challenge segregation and discrimination.

Landmark cases like Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and the civil rights legislation of the 1960s were turning points that relied on the principles enshrined in the Constitution, even when those principles were not being upheld. The suffrage and trials and tribulations that they’ve endured is unimaginable and yet they were successful.

Post-Reconstruction Era Violence:
After the abolition of slavery, during the Jim Crow era, African Americans faced systemic violence and repression, including being murdered for attempting to exercise basic civil rights, such as voting. The total number of African Americans who died as a result of racial violence in the decades following slavery is likely in the tens of thousands.

Women’s Suffrage Movement is another example. For much of U.S. history, women were denied the right to vote and had very few legal rights. Despite this, suffragists used the Constitution as a foundation to argue for their rights, leading to the passage of the 19th Amendment in 1920. Women’s rights, particularly in the context of marriage and mental health, were severely limited well into the 20th century. Up until the 1970s, in some cases, husbands could have their wives committed to mental institutions for a variety of reasons, often with little or no evidence.

This was part of a broader pattern of systemic inequality where women’s autonomy was heavily restricted. Laws and social norms often placed women in a subordinate position, allowing men, particularly husbands, significant control over their lives.

The 1970s saw significant advancements in women’s rights, including reforms in mental health laws, marital rights, and the broader feminist movement that challenged these deeply entrenched inequalities. The passage of laws like the 1975 Equal Credit Opportunity Act, which allowed women to apply for credit in their own names, and the rise of the women’s liberation movement played crucial roles in these changes.

However, the fact that such practices persisted into the 1970s highlights how deeply rooted and systemic these issues were. Now facing a new threat where men just by just merely claiming to be a woman are invading their rights that, if not stopped now and soon, will not only get worse.

🚨Extremely Important Thread!🚨
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Understanding Local Government and Election Processes

For the past year and a half, a significant portion of my articles and posts has been dedicated to one central theme:

The importance of understanding your local government—its policies, processes, structure, and decision-making.

This focus isn’t just about civic awareness; it’s about empowerment. In a time when trust in institutions is wavering, knowing how your local government operates is the first step in holding it accountable.

When it comes to elections, this understanding becomes even more critical. Elections are the bedrock of democracy, and ensuring their integrity is paramount. I’ve emphasized the need to deeply understand your local election processes—how votes are counted, how decisions are made, and who is responsible at each stage.

This knowledge is essential to counter any potential nefarious or corrupt actions that could be taking place right under our noses.

In this thread, I’m going to connect the dots and show you how various elements—ranging from local government policies to grassroots mobilization—can and did influence elections.

We’ll explore the dynamics at play, from legal frameworks to the agility of grassroots networks, and examine how these factors can either safeguard or undermine our electoral process.

This isn’t just a theoretical exercise; it’s a practical guide to understanding and protecting our republic.

The following is how compounded layers can provide for devastating effects while not exposing the whole operation. Understanding Political Strategies: An Analysis

First it’s is extremely important to understand strategy. The key point of my article yesterday was to dig into the political strategies of both Republicans and Democrats.

By understanding their strengths and weaknesses, we can better navigate the political landscape, reinforcing our positions where we’re strong and exploiting our adversaries’ weaknesses.

Brief Political Strategy Breakdowns:

Republican Strategy:

Centralized Approach: The GOP’s strategy is top-down, focusing on strong national leadership, judicial appointments, and long-term goals. This gives them a cohesive message but can slow them down at the grassroots level.

Strengths: Long-term influence, clear national messaging, and policy consistency.

Weaknesses: Slower grassroots mobilization, less flexibility in fast-changing environments.

Democrat Strategy:

Decentralized, Grassroots Approach:

The Democrats excel in grassroots mobilization and digital engagement. Their bottom-up approach makes them adaptable, but it can also lead to mixed messaging at the national level.

Strengths: Agility, strong grassroots networks, and quick mobilization.

Weaknesses: Potential for disunity in messaging, less focus on long-term structural changes like judicial appointments.

OK, well I guess it’s about that time. We’ve been accused of running psychological operations so I’m just gonna lay out some things you guys decide who’s running the side up on who …

Let’s break down the details of Michael Flynn’s case, including his plea bargain, the DOJ’s decision to drop charges, Trump’s pardon, and the surrounding speculation. There seems to be a pattern here but, hey, who am I to say anything. Here are the facts… 

Michael Flynn’s Case

Plea Bargain

1Charges: Michael Flynn was charged with making false statements to the FBI about his contacts with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the presidential transition period in December 2016.
2Plea Agreement: In December 2017, Flynn pleaded guilty to one count of making false statements. As part of the plea agreement, he cooperated with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

One caveat that I wanna mention. The FBI’s investigation into Michael Flynn also involved his son, Michael Flynn Jr. During the investigation, there were reports that prosecutors were considering charges against Flynn Jr. related to his work with his father’s consulting firm, Flynn Intel Group. It is believed that concerns about his son influenced Flynn’s decision to plead guilty and cooperate with the Special Counsel’s investigation. Flynn’s legal team later argued that his plea was coerced in part due to pressure involving his son.

DOJ’s Decision to Drop Charges

Review and Decision: In May 2020, the DOJ moved to drop the charges against Flynn, stating that the FBI’s interview of Flynn was conducted without a legitimate investigative basis and that his statements were not material to any viable counterintelligence investigation.

Procedural Concerns: The DOJ cited concerns about the FBI’s handling of the case, including issues with the interview’s setup and the decision-making process behind it.

Judge’s Response: Judge Emmet Sullivan, overseeing Flynn’s case, did not immediately grant the DOJ’s motion to dismiss. Instead, he appointed a former judge, John Gleeson, to argue against the DOJ’s decision and to examine whether Flynn should be held in contempt for perjury due to his plea withdrawal.

Trump’s Pardon

Pardon Issued: On November 25, 2020, President Donald Trump issued a full pardon to Michael Flynn. This pardon covered all possible offenses arising from the Mueller investigation and Flynn’s interactions with federal authorities.

Speculation of Refusal: There is speculation that Flynn initially resisted accepting a pardon because he believed the DOJ’s motion to dismiss the charges would succeed. However, with the legal battle prolonged by the judge’s refusal to immediately dismiss the case, Trump stepped in to issue the pardon.

Broad Scope: The pardon was broad, covering not only the specific charges Flynn faced but also any potential related offenses.


Who is Danny Casolaro? 

Background

Full Name: Joseph Daniel Casolaro

Birth and Death: Casolaro was born on June 16, 1947, and died on August 10, 1991.

Career: He worked as a freelance writer and was involved in various investigative projects, but he gained particular attention for his work on “The Octopus.”

The Octopus

Concept: Casolaro believed in the existence of a secret network of intelligence operatives, government officials, and private sector individuals who were manipulating global events for their benefit. He referred to this network as “The Octopus” due to its alleged wide-reaching influence.

Key Topics: His investigation linked a series of seemingly unrelated events and scandals, including the Inslaw case (a legal battle over the PROMIS software), the Iran-Contra affair, and the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) scandal.

Inslaw Case: Central to Casolaro’s theory was the claim that the U.S. government had stolen PROMIS software developed by the company Inslaw and repurposed it for intelligence and surveillance purposes.

Mysterious Death

Death: Danny Casolaro was found dead in a hotel room in Martinsburg, West Virginia, in August 1991. His wrists were slashed multiple times, and his death was officially ruled a suicide.

Circumstances: The circumstances surrounding his death were suspicious to many. Casolaro had told friends and family that he was on the verge of breaking a major story. His papers and notes related to “The Octopus” were missing from the hotel room, leading to further speculation about foul play.

The “Octopus” Theory:

The concept of a secret network of intelligence veterans manipulating global events for their own power consolidation is speculative. While covert operations have been carried out by various agencies, the idea of a monolithic, coordinated group like the “Octopus” lacks definitive proof.

Involvement in the Kennedy Assassination:
•The Kennedy assassination has been the subject of many conspiracy theories. While there are various theories about who was involved, including intelligence agencies and covert operatives, none have been conclusively proven.

Global Covert Manipulations:
•The claim that this group was involved in political upheavals in numerous countries (e.g., Angola, Rhodesia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Nigeria, Chile, Iran, and Iraq) is speculative. While there is evidence of U.S. involvement in some of these areas, attributing all these events to a single coordinated group is unproven.

October Surprise and PROMIS Software:
•The “October Surprise” theory suggests a deliberate manipulation of the 1980 U.S. presidential election. While there are suspicions and some anecdotal evidence, it remains unproven.
•The idea that PROMIS software was widely used for global surveillance and covert operations is part of conspiracy narratives and lacks substantial evidence.

Facts that Joseph Daniel Casolaro wrote about: 

Inslaw Case and PROMIS Software:

Fact: The Inslaw case involved a legal dispute between Inslaw Inc., a software company, and the U.S. Department of Justice over the alleged theft of the PROMIS (Prosecutor’s Management Information System) software. Inslaw claimed that the DOJ had improperly used and distributed its software.

Legal Rulings: There were several court rulings in favor of Inslaw, which supported their claims to some extent, although the issue remains complex and contentious.

Iran-Contra Affair:

Fact: The Iran-Contra affair was a political scandal during the Reagan administration involving the secret sale of arms to Iran, which was then under an arms embargo, and using the proceeds to fund Contra rebels in Nicaragua.

Investigations and Hearings: This scandal was thoroughly investigated by Congress and is well-documented.

Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) Scandal:

This information comes from previous articles I have published....

PART 1 of many!!!!

Delving into the realm of U.S. immigration benefits reveals a complex landscape, especially when considering the plight of Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) and Unaccompanied Refugee Minors (URM), with Arizona serving as a significant case study.

The conversation begins by defining an immigrant according to the Immigration and Nationality Act: an individual seeking to become a Lawful Permanent Resident of the United States. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) delineates various immigration pathways, including the Adjustment of Status, allowing those already within the U.S. to pursue lawful permanent residency, colloquially known as obtaining a Green Card.

Focusing on Unaccompanied Alien Children, as outlined by 6 USC § 279(g)(2), these are minors without lawful U.S. immigration status, under 18, and lacking a parent or legal guardian in the U.S. to provide care.

The situation for Unaccompanied Refugee Minors (URM), however, unfolds into a more intricate narrative. The term "unaccompanied refugee minor" lacks a singular, clear-cut legal definition within U.S. federal statutes, instead drawing its meaning from a broader legislative and policy framework that includes the Refugee Act of 1980 and the Homeland Security Act of 2002.

These laws, alongside the guiding principles of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), form the policy for addressing URM needs.

However, whistleblowers and investigations have cast a shadow over the ORR's capacity to manage these responsibilities effectively, pointing to grave missteps and potential disasters in the care and oversight of these vulnerable groups.

The bifurcation of funding into two distinct streams—one for UACs and another for URMs—underscores the different legal standings and the support mechanisms designed for each group. While UACs fall under the Department of Homeland Security's purview before transitioning to ORR care, URMs are enveloped within the ORR's refugee assistance programs from the outset. The urgent call for clear, coherent policies in managing the financial mechanisms and classifications of unaccompanied minors shines a spotlight on the critical need for policies that are finely tuned to the unique requirements of these diverse groups. Ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently and equitably is paramount. This imperative for clarity and precision extends well beyond the formulation of policies to include a demand for enhanced transparency and oversight.

The challenges of transparency and oversight are markedly intensified by the lack of clearly defined laws and parameters. The ambiguity surrounding legal definitions, coupled with the deficiency in precise data for effective oversight, fosters conditions ripe for mismanagement and inefficiency.

These conditions pose dire risks not only to the welfare of Unaccompanied Refugee Minors (URMs) but also to the integrity of the programs designed to support them. A dedicated effort to sharpen legal definitions, bolster data collection and analysis, and improve the transparency of operational and decision-making processes is essential for the proper care of URMs.

In 2023, Arizona became a host to 1,229 unaccompanied refugee minors, with the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) reporting an additional 368 unaccompanied alien children, and the Department of State’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) accounting for 2,613 refugees.

The URM funding is managed under the 93.566 grant, while UAC funding operates through the 93.676 grant. Delving into the financial support provided to these groups in 2023 unveils the dynamics of grant allocation and the programs it supports.

The substantial assistance programs available in the United States for refugees and unaccompanied minors have ignited significant concerns among American citizens. The perception that these comprehensive benefits outshine the support accessible to U.S. citizens, including veterans and others in need, underscores a deep-seated frustration. This sentiment calls for a reassessment of priorities to ensure that the needs of American citizens are not overshadowed.

@Fight4Truths
If you believe the United States is a corporation, you've been misled.

Thinking our nation's capital is foreign land means you've lost touch with your national pride and sovereignty.

Freedom is a mindset that cannot be taken by anyone. If you're convinced our country is controlled by foreign powers, religions, or bankers, you've fallen for a deception from those same entities.

Ask yourself, who benefits from making you believe that your nation is a corporation, owned by outside interests, without our collective consent?

Our nation has never been a corporation, regardless of what anyone says. If you believe General Miley is on the patriotic side, the narrative has consumed you.
It's crucial to focus on the Constitution and the rule of law, understanding how our laws function within this great nation.

Whether or not you agree with them, or find them righteous, is secondary to comprehending how our government is structured and operates to make the required changes. Just as Trump is doing and showing us.

This misunderstanding reflects the shortcomings of our education system and a lack of moral fortitude needed to govern a country like the United States.
My intent is not to provoke for followers or clicks but to speak on American pride, nationalism, and the importance of upholding our Constitution while exposing government corruption, even if it limits my reach.

Our government, our country, our capital is not a corporation, nor is it controlled by foreign entities. It is controlled by you!! Do you have control or not?!
It belongs to the American people. Many have forgotten their identity as Americans.

Despite attacks on my character, my content stands firm in debunking the myth that the U.S. is a corporation. No one has attacked my content.

The Organic Act of 1871 did not transform our nation into a corporation; it established local governance within our capital, subordinate to our Constitution. There is no "second constitution.

Solving problems doesn't involve fabricating fantasies to justify inaction or excuses. I challenge anyone to provide legal, constitutional proof that we are a corporation. I've faced personal attacks for this stance, but I remain focused on the argument, having already debunked the "corporation theory" thoroughly.

I welcome scholarly debate without resorting to insults, which I'll take as a sign of ignorance and a lack of resolve to engage constructively in governance.

The narrative that our nation is fundamentally flawed by being "corporate" or "owned" fuels ignorance and detracts from our responsibility to understand and participate in our governance system.

We may face challenges, including corruption and financial woes, but we are not defeated. We are at a beginning, not an end. The real issue is the excuses made to avoid facing these challenges head-on.

To those who promote such ideologies, I offer a challenge: present your best arguments without resorting to insults. An attack on my person is inconsequential; an attack on my content, however, demands a response. Resorting to personal attacks only reveals a lack of understanding and an unwillingness to engage in meaningful dialogue.

Let's elevate the conversation and remember our collective responsibility to our nation and its foundational principles. ORIGIN AND GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

The name of the Seat of Government is the United States. “The District of Columbia”
AUTHORITY FOR ITS ESTABLISHMENT.

The District of Columbia was established under the authority and direction of Acts of Congress approved July 16, 1700, and March 3. 1791, which were passed to give effect to a clause in the;

Eighth section of the first article of the Constitution of the United States, giving Congress the power;

“To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by session of particular states and acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places, purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state, in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings.”

LACATION

It is located on the eastern bank of the Potomac river, about 106 miles from the junction of that river with Chesapeake Bay.

AREA AND DIMENSIONS
It originally embraced an area of about 10 mi.² but since the recession of the part derived from Virginia, contains only 9.245 mi.². The portion east of the Potomac river was succeeded to Congress by the state of Maryland. The portion west of that river was succeeded by the state of Virginia. a recent survey by the United States coast, and Geodetic survey shows that the original boundary lines of the district, very from 10 miles long, such as follows.

Southwestern side, 10 miles, 230.6 feet
Northeastern side 10 miles, 263.1 feet
Southeastern side 10 miles, 70.5 feet
Northwestern side 10 miles 63 feet.

The most northern point is 116 feet west of the Meridian, which runs through the southern corner.

STEPS TO GET STARTED WITH LOCAL INVOLVEMENT BEFORE CONTACTING YOUR PRECINCT

Phase 1: Online Research

The goals for Phase 1 are primarily focused on building a foundational understanding of your community and its governance. Here are the goals for each week:

Step 1: Understand Your Community

Task 1: Research your community's population size, age distribution, ethnic makeup, income levels, and education levels. This information, which can be found in the U.S. Census Bureau's website, can give you an idea of the resources and opportunities in your community.

Task 2: Identify Key Local Issues. Investigate the primary concerns in your community. These could range from public safety to education, healthcare, or environmental issues. Local news outlets, community meetings, and social media groups can be valuable sources of information.

Task 3: Understand Local Economy. Research the key industries and employers in your community. Understanding the economic landscape can provide insight into job opportunities, economic challenges, and areas for potential growth or investment.

Task 4: Identify Community Initiatives. Get familiar with local organizations, charities, or initiatives that align with your interests or concerns. Consider volunteering, not only does it contribute to your community but also allows you to understand its dynamics better.

Task 5: Explore Local History and Culture. Visit local museums, historical sites, or cultural centers. Understanding the history and culture of your community can provide valuable context for current issues and community dynamics. It can also foster a sense of connection and pride in your community. Step 2: Understand the Law

Task 1: Research the legal structure of you local government. This could involve understanding whether your community operates under a home rule charter or general law.

Task 2: Familiarize yourself with the key laws and regulations that govern your community. This could involve reviewing local ordinances, zoning regulations, and other local laws.

Task 3: Understand the roles and responsibilities of local government officials. This could involve researching the duties of city council members, county commissioners, or other elected officials in your community.

Task 4: Learn about the legal processes used in your community. This could involve understanding how laws are made at the local level, how public meetings are conducted, and how citizens can participate in these processes.

Task 5: Research any significant legal issues or controversies in your community. This could involve understanding ongoing debates about land use, taxation, public services, or other contentious issues.

Since I haven’t seen anyone mention this complete disaster of a problem in this movement, I guess I will.

There are major fundamental issues that IS dividing us. Facts…..

The first?

Doxxing - Doxxing refers to the malicious practice of gathering and publishing private or identifying information about an individual on the internet, typically without their consent, with the intent to intimidate, threaten, harass, or shame. This information can include home addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, places of employment, or other personal data. The term originates from "dropping dox" or documents, originally referring to the compilation and release of documents about a person.

So STOP FUCKING DOXXING PEOPLE!!

Next, and I can’t believe I have to bring this shit up….

👇🏻👇🏻

When someone threatens to dox you in exchange for something or payment, it’s referred to as “extortion.” In the context of doxxing, this means the perpetrator is threatening to release sensitive, private information about someone unless they receive what they’re demanding, which could be money, other forms of payment, or specific actions from the victim.

STOP FUCKING EXTORTING PEOPLE!!

Next, Blackmail? Yeah…. This is where we are at.

👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

Blackmail is a crime involving the act of threatening to reveal potentially damaging or embarrassing information about a person to the public, their family, or associates unless a demand made by the blackmailer is met. These demands typically involve the payment of money but can also include other forms of compliance or actions that benefit the blackmailer in some way.

STOP FUCKING BLACKMAILING PEOPLE!!

For the slimy assholes doing this type of shit to people..….. 🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻You are evil and scum of the earth!

These are the types of things that can cause someone to suffer…. Greatly!! …..

People take their own lives for this!!! This is no joke people!! This needs exposure!!

If you are in a situation like this, there is a way out….. Let’s talk about this, what can you do?

First, act now! Protect yourself!

Prevention:

1. Create a Safety Plan

A. Protecting Your Online Identity

• Use Strong Passwords: Create unique, strong passwords for each of your online accounts. Consider using a password manager to keep track of them.

• Enable Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Wherever possible, enable 2FA to add an extra layer of security to your accounts.

• Be Mindful of Shared Information: Limit the personal information you share online, especially on social media. Adjust privacy settings to restrict who can see your posts and personal details.

• Regularly Monitor Accounts: Keep an eye on your online accounts for any unusual activity or signs of unauthorized access.

• Secure Your Devices: Use antivirus software, keep your devices’ operating systems up to date, and secure your home network with a strong Wi-Fi password and, if possible, a VPN.

B. Securing Personal Safety Against Physical Threats

• Inform Trusted Contacts: Share your situation with trusted family members or friends so they can support you and help monitor for safety concerns.

• Safety Measures at Home: Consider changing locks if necessary, install security cameras, and ensure your home address is not easily available online.

• Stay Aware of Surroundings: Be cautious when sharing your location in real-time on social media, and vary your routines if you feel you are being watched or followed.

• Legal Protection Orders: If there’s a significant threat, inquire about obtaining a restraining order or other legal protections against the individual posing the threat.

C. Strategies for Financial Security

• Monitor Financial Accounts:

Regularly check your bank statements and credit reports for any unauthorized transactions or accounts opened in your name.

• Secure Communication with Financial Institutions:

Ensure that your financial institutions have up-to-date contact information for you and inquire about additional security measures for your accounts.

• Fraud Alerts and Credit Freezes:

Consider placing fraud alerts on your credit reports or a credit freeze if you suspect your financial information has been compromised.

• Financial Passwords:

Change passwords for online banking and financial services. Use unique, strong passwords for each service, and avoid using the same passwords across multiple sites.

• Be Cautious with Financial Transactions:

Be wary of unsolicited requests for financial information or payments, even if they appear to come from legitimate entities. Verify the authenticity of such requests through direct contact using official numbers or websites.

In all these aspects, the key is proactive management and regular monitoring of your security, privacy, and financial wellbeing. Engaging with professionals for advice tailored to your specific situation can also provide additional layers of protection and peace of mind.

I thought it might be interesting to try something new. This may be a hit or miss, but I’m presenting a challenge to everyone, especially as people are becoming more aware of the non-government organizations (NGOs) involved with unaccompanied alien children and refugee resettlement programs. Let’s embark on a digital, investigative adventure.

I’m going to provide you with two key resources: the websites of the Department of State here,



And here,



Here’s the essence of the challenge: I will post information about several NGOs, at least a few dozen. Your task is to use the websites I’ve mentioned to dig deeper. You need to identify the congressional districts where these NGOs are receiving funding and determine the amount of money they are getting. The rest of the investigation will be up to you.

Happy hunting!!wrapsnet.org/rp-agency-cont…
usaspending.gov
usaspending.gov/search/?hash=b…


Here’s another source to find funding, if anyone knows of any other sources, please post them here for people to use.

taggs.hhs.gov

Digital Battlegrounds: Unraveling Information Warfare and Its Impact on American Sovereignty

Part 1: Introduction to Information Warfare

Definition and Scope: Information warfare refers to the use and management of information to gain a competitive advantage over an adversary, often involving both offensive and defensive operations. This warfare type transcends traditional battlefields, encompassing digital and informational domains. It involves various strategies like cyber attacks, propaganda, and misinformation to influence public opinion, disrupt enemy operations, and gain political, economic, or military advantages.

The concept of information warfare is not new, but its significance and complexity have drastically increased with technological advancements. Historically, it began with simple propaganda techniques and misinformation strategies used to demoralize enemies or mislead during wartime. The advent of the internet and digital technology in the late 20th century marked a transformative era. Governments and non-state actors began harnessing digital platforms for cyber espionage, hacking, and influencing public narratives. This evolution reflects the changing nature of global conflicts where information is as crucial as physical weaponry.

Current Landscape: Today, the global landscape of information warfare is intricate and continuously evolving, significantly impacting American sovereignty. The U.S., like many nations, faces challenges in securing its digital infrastructure against cyber threats from state and non-state actors. Information warfare has become a tool for foreign interference in elections, industrial espionage, and spreading disinformation to manipulate public perception and policy-making. The digital space has turned into a battleground for controlling narratives, with social media platforms being particularly pivotal in this dynamic. Understanding and countering these threats are vital for maintaining national security, democratic integrity, and international standing. Part 2: Domains of Warfare

Traditional Domains (Land, Sea, Air, Space):

Overview for Context:

Warfare has historically been confined to four primary domains: land, sea, air, and, more recently, space. Each domain has unique characteristics that dictate the types of military strategies and technologies used. Land warfare involves ground troops and armored vehicles, sea warfare includes naval ships and submarines, air warfare encompasses aircraft and missiles, and space warfare, the newest domain, involves satellites and space technology. These traditional domains have been the mainstay of military strategy and conflict, shaping the global geopolitical landscape for centuries.

Information/Digital Domain:

In-depth Exploration of this Domain’s Impact: The information/digital domain has emerged as a crucial fifth domain of warfare, distinct yet interconnected with the traditional domains. It involves the use of digital networks, information technology, and cyber capabilities to conduct and counter warfare activities. This domain’s impact is profound and multifaceted:

Cyber Operations:

The ability to conduct cyber attacks against another nation’s infrastructure, such as power grids, financial systems, and government networks, represents a significant shift in warfare tactics. These operations can cause widespread disruption without the need for traditional physical military engagements.

Information Control:

Controlling information in the digital domain includes managing public perception through social media, propaganda, and misinformation. It’s a powerful tool for influencing domestic and foreign populations, shaping political opinions, and even swaying electoral outcomes.

Intelligence and Surveillance:

The digital domain is pivotal for intelligence gathering and surveillance. Advanced cyber espionage techniques allow for the covert collection of critical data from adversaries, providing a strategic advantage.

Integration with Traditional Domains:

The digital domain is deeply integrated with traditional warfare domains. Cyber capabilities enhance the efficacy of land, sea, air, and space operations through improved communication, reconnaissance, and remote control of systems.

Asymmetric Warfare:

Digital warfare levels the playing field for smaller nations or non-state actors, allowing them to challenge larger powers effectively. Cyber attacks can be launched remotely and anonymously, making it a preferred mode of engagement for asymmetric warfare.

The information/digital domain’s emergence as a critical aspect of modern warfare fundamentally changes the dynamics of global conflicts, demanding innovative defense strategies and new international norms to govern its use.

Dear Agencies, NGOs, Representatives, and Mr. Selected President,

Did you think we would simply forget? Do you believe that the cries and suffering of innocent children will just fade into silence? No, they won't. We refuse to let this tragedy become a forgotten chapter in our nation's history.

We remember, and we stand as the voice for those children whose lives are being torn apart by the ongoing calamities at our borders. Their plight is not just a fleeting concern; it's a stark reminder of the failure of our system, a system you are accountable for.

This letter is an indictment of the inaction and apathy that have allowed these atrocities to continue unchecked. It is a direct appeal to every agency involved and to you, Mr. President, for allowing such egregious human rights violations to persist under your watch. This is not just unacceptable; it is a moral failing of the highest order.

It's baffling, and indeed infuriating, that this crisis is still unfolding, with children being subjected to the horrors of neglect, abuse, and exploitation. How can we, as a nation, stand idly by? How can we claim to be champions of freedom and human rights when our actions, or rather inactions, speak otherwise? Our silence and passivity make us complicit.

Who among us is taking a stand? Where are our representatives on this issue? Their silence is deafening, and their absence in this fight is nothing short of a betrayal. This is not just a political issue; it's a human one. It's about the lives of children who look to us for protection and care, and we are failing them miserably.

This situation is beyond humiliating; it is a stain on the fabric of our nation. It undermines the very values we hold dear. It's time for a radical change. It's time for those in power to step up, take responsibility, and make tangible changes. We need leaders who will not just speak of justice and compassion but who will act on these principles.

We demand immediate and transparent actions to rectify this crisis. We call for comprehensive investigations into the agencies involved, for accountability for those who have perpetuated these horrors, and for the implementation of policies that genuinely safeguard the well-being of these vulnerable children.

Our country stands at a crossroads, and the path we choose will define us for generations to come. Will we continue to turn a blind eye, or will we rise to the challenge and enact the changes necessary to protect and honor the most vulnerable among us? The world is watching, the children are waiting, and history will remember our choice.
Sincerely,

WE THE FUCKING PEOPLE!!!!! DO SOMETHING NOW!! Let’s examine what our hard-earned money is actually funding, and then assess how much we are actually paying…

Financial Mismanagement and Profiteering:

Nonprofit Organizations (NGOs) funded by the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) have been accused of mismanaging funds and profiting from the care of defenseless UACs.

Security Breaches in UAC Transportation:

The transportation and handling of UACs by NGOs are plagued with secrecy, irregularities, and security breaches, leading to UACs' involvement in criminal activities.

Exploitation of Immigration System Loopholes:

NGOs have exploited immigration system loopholes, facilitating the entry of individuals with criminal intentions into the U.S.

Inadequate Verification and Background Checks:

NGOs have overlooked critical criminal histories and waived background checks, placing UACs in dangerous environments.

Compromised Safety Protocols:

ORR’s weakened safety protocols have increased risks to UACs, with ineffective sponsor screening and substandard case manager practices.

Exploitation and Abuse Under Sponsorship:

A pattern of exploitation has emerged, with sponsors receiving multiple UACs and reports of forced labor, sexual abuse, and threats against children.

Today, I've been giving out a lot of information.

I'm here to remind you of how this movement started.

I want you to focus on mission 1 and 3.

READ!!!!!! READ!!!!! READ!!!!!!

This is what I've been doing all day that people's been complaining about.

You may not agree with Q or not, but that's the mission I'm taking right now.

You've been distracted from your mission.

We need to rally up, regroup, and focus.

You have been selected to help serve your Country.

Never retreat from the battlefield [Twitter, FB, etc.].

Use other platforms as a form of centralized command and control.

Organize and connect [bridge through linking].
Source meme(s) material from battlefield and/or garage [highlight & share][take & drop]

MISSION 1: Dispute [reject] propaganda push through posting of research and facts

MISSION 2: Support role of other digital soldiers [one falls another stands (rises)]

MISSION 3: Guide [awaken] others through use of facts [DECLAS 1-99 material and other relevant facts] and memes [decouple MSDNC control of info stream]_ask 'counter' questions to initiate 'thought' vs repeat [echo] of MSDNC propaganda.

MISSION 4: Learn use of camouflage [digitally] _primary account suspended-terminated _use of secondary.

MISSION 5:Identify strengths / weaknesses [personal and designated target(s)] re: Twitter & FB [+other]
example re: meme(s) failure to read through use of ALGO [think Tron (MCP_master control program)]
_dependence on person-to-person capture [slow response time unidentified user(s)]

Game theory.

Information warfare. LFG!!!!!!!

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.

Together we win.

Q
I've observed a recurring pattern while researching this theory, and I'm ready to demonstrate it. My concern is that this pattern, which seems clear to me, is being missed by others. Perhaps many are too distracted to notice. Regardless of any potential backlash, I'm committed to presenting my findings. In the following segment, we will examine a series of statements from a video made by Derek. He makes numerous claims, and we intend to analyze them methodically, one by one, in a live breakdown.

Derek Claims,

“Trump is still Commander in Chief Via Laws and Orders.

“June 12, 2015, a law war manual was issued. Four days later, Donald John Trump rolls down the escalator to announce his candidacy for president. That was four days after, so June 16, 2015. Then in 2016, the United States Supreme Court, the first time in history they backed our founders, they wrote a thing called the Military Justice Act of 2016. It was not passed until 2017.”

Actually, there have been other Military Justice Acts in the past before the Military Justice Act of 2016. The history of significant amendments to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) includes several notable Military Justice Acts. Here are some of the key acts:

Military Justice Act of 1968:

This act, officially known as Public Law No. 90-632, became law on October 24, 1968. It was the first major amendment to the UCMJ, which itself was established in 1950. The Military Justice Act of 1968 made significant changes to the military justice system, marking a key moment in its legislative history​​.

Military Justice Act of 1983:

This act (Public Law No. 98-209) was signed into law on December 6, 1983, and took effect on August 1, 1984. Sponsored by Iowa Senator Roger W. Jepsen,it represented another major amendment to the UCMJ, indicating ongoing efforts to refine and update the military justice system​​.

Military Justice Act of 2016:

As part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, the Military Justice Act of 2016 was signed into law. It represented the most significant reforms to the UCMJ since its enactment, according to Senator John McCain​​​​.
These acts, alongside the establishment of the UCMJ in 1950 and its precursors like the Elston Act of 1948, reflect the evolving nature of military justice in the United States, adapting to changing needs and perspectives over time​​​​.

Just like with anything we research, depth and context matters.

Let’s look at the fundamental purpose of FEMA, DoD, DHS and Each Service Branch, define their mission statements and compare them for deeper understanding about directives and policies.

Why Military Uses Their own Doctrine and Directives.

Mission Statements

DoD Mission Statement

The mission statement of the United States Department of Defense (DoD) is as follows:

"The mission of the Department of Defense is to provide the military forces needed to deter war and ensure our nation’s security."
Department of the Navy Mission Statement

United States Navy:

"The United States is a maritime nation, and the U.S. Navy protects America at sea. Alongside our allies and partners, we defend freedom, preserve economic prosperity, and keep the seas open and free. Our nation is engaged in long-term competition. To defend American interests around the globe, the U.S. Navy must remain prepared to execute our timeless role, as directed by Congress and the President"​​.

United States Marine Corps Mission Statement

United States Marine Corps:

As outlined in 10 U.S.C. § 5063 and originally introduced under the National Security Act of 1947, the U.S. Marine Corps has three primary areas of responsibility:

· Seizure or defense of advanced naval bases and other land operations to support naval campaigns.

· Development of tactics, technique, and equipment used by amphibious landing forces in coordination with the Army and Air Force; and
· Such other duties as the President or Department of Defense may direct​​.

The truth about “COG”

The goal here first is to provide accurate information and clarify the role of continuity of government (COG), which is the core concept in both Derek Johnson’s and Patel Patriots theories.

Derek Johnson argues that COG was initiated, Trump took the role of CIC separate of the president and that we are in martial law utilizing the Law of War manual.

Patel Patriot has similar arguments, however both theories rest on the idea that COG was initiated and that is what triggers both misguided theory’s.

My focus will be on continuity of operations, continuity of government, and enduring constitutional government. Those three concepts work together as detailed in the national continuity policy. The aim is to define their purpose, identify who these programs depend upon, and clarify the concept of National Essential Functions, NEFs.

These three concepts are specifically designed to address national emergencies and crises, ensuring the preservation of essential functions within the framework of continuity of operations. It’s important to understand that Continuity of Operations (COOP) and Continuity of Government COG plans exist within every department of the federal, state, tribal, and local governments as part of the National Continuity Policy.

These concepts are not intended for "secret" missions or processes, as described in both Derek and Jon's theories. Although the plans within each department are classified depending on the nature of that department, the concepts of programs themselves are open source for the public to see.
What does the national continuity policy consist of?

As stated in the Continuity Guidance Circular:

"Continuity of operations, continuity of government and Enduring constitutional government are dependent upon the foundation of preparedness built by each and every individual and community. No level of government can perform essential functions and provide critical services without the support of the rest of the Nation. Private sector entities, critical infrastructure, non-governmental organizations, communities, individuals, families, and households play a vital role."

What is continuity of operations (COOP)?

As defined in the Continuity Guidance Circular:

"Continuity of operations (COOP) ensures an individual organization can continue to perform its essential functions, provide essential services, and deliver core capabilities during a disruption to normal operations. Effective continuity of operations activities provide a baseline capability and represent the minimum standard required by a comprehensive, integrated national continuity program."

What is Continuity of Government (COG)?

As defined in the Continuity Guidance Circular:

"Continuity of government (COG) is a coordinated effort within each of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches to ensure that essential functions continue to be performed before, during, and after an emergency or threat. COG is an outcome of a viable continuity capability, not a program. Continuity of government is intended to preserve the statutory and constitutional authority of elected officials at all levels of government across the United States."

And what is Enduring Constitutional Government?

As defined in the Continuity Guidance Circular:

"Enduring Constitutional Government (ECG) – A cooperative effort among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches to preserve the constitutional framework under which people are governed. Enduring constitutional government focuses on the ability of all three branches of government to execute constitutional responsibilities, provide for orderly succession and appropriate transition of leadership, and provide for interoperability and support of essential functions during a catastrophic emergency."