Abdulmumini Profile picture
Nov 20 7 tweets 2 min read
L2 SECURITY VERDICT: Who fixes centralization?
​Scroll relies on Math (ZK Proofs). Metis relies on People (DSeq).
​The ultimate winner for billions in capital is the chain that fixes Identity. If you had to choose a security model, which one earns your trust? Full thread. Image 1/4.ZK/Math Model (Scroll)
Strength: Instant finality via ZK-Proofs. Math guarantees correctness.
Flaw: Relies on a centralized seq. SPOF risks censorship, contradicting decent. ethos.
Verdict: Strong core security, but
sequencing is the main bottleneck for true decentralization.
Nov 19 8 tweets 2 min read
METIS vs. SCROLL: WHICH L2 SECURITY MODEL WINS? ⚔️
​Scroll relies on Math (ZK Proofs) for security. Metis relies on People (Decentralized Sequencers).
​Metis argues ZK-Rollups still have a single point of failure (centralized sequencers). Its answer is the DSEQ Reboot. 👇 1/5. 🧠 The Decentralized Sequencer (DSeq)
Metis pioneers the first distributed sequencer pool.
🔹 Goal: Eliminate the Single Point of Failure (SPOF)—the centralized sequencer used by all other L2s.
🔹 Benefit: Prevents censorship and increases liveness (24/7 uptime).