How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/abdallah_fayyad/status/1900549396959215682
https://twitter.com/AdHaque110/status/18646813511792888642. Put the other way around, an applicant must show that it is unreasonable to infer from the evidence that the respondent acted *without* genocidal intent.
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1800352266244751394
https://twitter.com/USUN/status/1794107307397197994
https://twitter.com/CIJ_ICJ/status/17935561393445274792. In a more rational world, this finding alone would dominate the news, set off alarm bells throughout the international system, and trigger immediate action by the UN Security Council. Alas, that is not our world.
https://x.com/leloveluck/status/1793560099577106698
https://twitter.com/AdHaque110/status/17925209948772436302. This is important because, under the ICC Statute, the starvation war crime would only apply in the context of an international armed conflict.
https://twitter.com/AdHaque110/status/17903321491338899012. South Africa argues:
https://twitter.com/AdHaque110/status/1742584154410176759
https://twitter.com/opiniojuris/status/1732686635865698702
https://twitter.com/marinklevy/status/1521104271160324096
https://twitter.com/just_security/status/13983243155531612242. The *tower* was no long a military objective by its *use* if Hamas evacuated it.
https://twitter.com/AdHaque110/status/1395049099444072454?s=20
https://twitter.com/Articles_of_War/status/13947270758405120002. Military advantage is assessed *in the circumstances ruling at the time* of the attack.
https://twitter.com/issam_younis/status/13942565088552345662. The basic point here has been made by others, including by many Palestinians. This is just a more technical legal version. Honestly, any decent person with common sense will find this all obvious.
https://twitter.com/issam_younis/status/1394287567038779393?s=20
https://twitter.com/MexOnu/status/1364635884621074435Vietnam obviously agrees, but I didn't hear an unambiguous statement.