ANOTHER IVERMECTIN DOESNT WORK FALSE FLAG.
Being used to dismantle the drug further.

The study by Reis et al is setup to fail.
FLAW ONE:
The treated group had oxygen saturation 85-93%. Such people have been sick for 7days. May be getting drug day 8! OUT OF TREAT WINDOW 1/3 FLAW TWO: "When we began this trial, we randomized patients to 1-day dosing of ivermectin, as
that is the dose most commonly used for parasitic diseases." (appendix) nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1…
MANY PRIOR TRIALS SHOW HIGHER DOSAGE. 2/3

SEEK ACCOUNT FROM ALL COVID INFLUENCERS: Harari WEF front-man says mass biometric surveillance for Covid.
Covid influencers are under WEF/WHO, they must justify/account for entire narrative. They can't sell vax alone. RETWEET. Aggressively seek answers in threads. A-list? 1/4 US influencers: @PeterHotez @MonicaGandhi9 @ashishkjha @MonicaGandhi9 @DrPaulOffit @EricTopol @ZDoggMD @daniel_kraft @ScottGottliebMD @sailorrooscout @HelenBranswell @michaelmine_lab a short list. We've tried to talk science no dice. Are you for WEF/WHO biometrics too? 2/4

BIGGEST SURVIVORSHIP BIAS SCAM IN HISTORY: If you want to boost a product littered with bulletholes to keep it flying on the market, you must lie. The vax stats are lies. When we were last fighting the Nazi's in WWII the planes that came back had holes. 1/6 Many wanted to reinforce places with red dots. Statistician Abraham Wald didn't, he wanted to reinforce where there were no indications of damage. The fog of war is confusing all again. Survivorship bias is showing up in vax stats. Millions of scientists don't see it. 2/6

FIRST DOCTORS IN THE WORLD CALL FOR END TO VACCINE ROLLOUT: The gauntlet of the obvious has been thrown down. We concur. These products cannot be on the market. Because they harm people. @CCCAlliance is literally saving their profession, and perhaps many from tyranny 1/10 Let's be honest. Industry capture is everywhere in the media, @GOOG @US_FDA @CDCgov @Twitter @LinkedIn @Meta @Microsoft @CBCToronto @CNN @nytimes rumble.com/voz64j-brought… Central agents create reality frames for the public, red pill, it really is a matrix. Titanic sank too. 2/10

MYOCARDITIS IN YOUNG BOYS: Our current model, happy to amend (it's science not state secrets). Hong Kong data is 1 in 2331. That's very high and increasing. Soon every high school will have a myo-casuality. And tens more with undetected 'milder' heart damage. WE MUST.. 1/5 STOP NOW. NO MORE KID VAX. Because of science. The myo rate post-Covid is 5/mi, maybe 10/mi but it's not 450/mi. This Singer study is used by the Covid influencer docs & media to suggest it is 100x higher. So PostCovid 5/mi vs PostVax 428/mi that's 95X..WORSE 2/5

CHILD STROKES ON DECK WORLDWIDE: London, Ontario Hospital @lhsccanada prepares for strokes Oct 15th email reveals. The question? Is this preparation for the vax or coincidence? One on our team designed stroke perfusion imaging used worldwide. The truth? (retweet save lives!) 1/8 1st WHAT IS A CLOT? Kids coerced so we must educate to save lives. See pic from our upcoming course! When vessel walls are destroyed by gene therapy--via immune system attack spike proteins-- clots form to fill in the gaps. A clot=red blood cells, platelets, fibrin mesh. 2/8

1/6 VAX GROUP THINK: Academia bias runs deep and the bias is IMPACTING FREEDOM! In this 20s clip @VirusesImmunity posits 4 vax facts a) the ONLY safe way to immunity b) the most reliable way c) superior long term and ) superior robust [vs natural infection]. TRUE? 2/6 a) V is ONLY SAFE way? VAERS+Europe data we have 25k deaths. Back out correlations and add under-reporting its prob 75k+. Early treatments have been blocked so a true "taste test" of vax vs natural in elderly not done. In KIDS, good data to say nat inf is/will be SAFER!

1/8 HUGE INFLUENCER PUSH AGAINST SCIENCE. Goal? To have FDA approve vaccine without data.
How: The mass ongoing Experimental trial would end (mercy.school/posts/experime…). The FDA's mandate that 24 months of adverse event evidence be collected for approval would be dropped. WORSE.. 2/8 Life-altering adverse events like auto-immune disorders, fertility issues ramping up now or medium-short term (1y) wouldn't be detected. Removing a control group (the unvaccinated) is dangerous for the vaccinated. Did they think of this? No mentions..ITS OPINION..

BREAKTHROUGH LEGAL DOCUMENT BETWEEN UNC + MODERNA + NIAID MAY CHANGE HISTORY 1/4 retweet | follow essential DECEPTION: World's leading Coronavirus researcher was preparing in december. This isn't basic resaerch, this is an animal model challenge study. IF THE PROBLEM VIRUS TRACES TO THE UNC+WUHAN LABS, THEN THEY WERE ALSO INVOLVED IN CREATING THE FIX. WAS IT IN. GOOD FAITH? 2/4

(1/12) Our science team looked and we have big questions. How can PCR Testing be used unscientifically? Or even to commit fraud? To preface we are in exploration. We need help from other scientists. Let's count the ways things PCR can go wrong. (2/12) 1) OTHER DNA PROBLEM. Bacteria, Virus, other human could match. Evidence exists that PCR primers are NOT SPECIFIC to Sars-Cov2. Sometimes multiple primers aren't used so test is less specific! Are we amplifying other DNA? (100% likely)