The Shaykh Taught us:
Wahhabis aren’t from the people Sunnah.
As their main enemy is the Sunnah it self. Wahhabism is indeed a means to give a creature divine attributes so they may worship the antichrist.
They await their master.

قال في المنهاج: وَلَوْ دَخَلَ دَارَهُ وَأَزْعَجَهُ عَنْهَا، أَوْ أَزْعَجَهُ وَقَهَرَهُ عَلَى الدَّارِ وَلَمْ يَدْخُلْ فَغَاصِبٌ، وَفِي الثَّانِيَةِ وَجْهٌ وَاهٍ . هذه مسألة غصب العقار

وصورها الإمام النووي بصورتين

الأولى : دخل دار لآخر ، وأزعجه يعني أخرجه منها . فهذا غاصب .

ثم قال في الصورة الثانية : ولو ازعجه يعني أخرجه وقهره على الدار ، ولكن لم يدخل هو ؛ فهو غاصب أيضًا .

لأن الغصب عبارة عن الاستيلاء على حق الغير .

Do Asharis support Putin, Bashar, sisi…etc. ?!
No.
But even if we were to say yes.
Don’t we all know for a fact that many others on the opposing side literally support US, UK & the European bloc & Israel!
This type of approach is sick! No Muslim supports a kafir.
However, there are in each situation a cause to lean towards a direction.
You can’t actually point the finger and say See!
Each individual in each situation plans what they perceive as safe.

The Jahmyyah & Mu’tazilah said that the 2nd verse of Surah al Anbya is evidence that the Quran is created.
Imam Ahmad said: No, it is referring to the Most recent we have received. Ibn Kathir also narrated this:

قال ابن كثير أيضا في " البداية " (10 / 327):
عن أحمد بن حنبل أنه أجاب الجهمية حين احتجوا عليه بقوله تعالى: )من ربهم محدث إلا استمعوه وهم يلعبون) قال: يحتمل أن يكون تنزيله إلينا هو المحدث، لا الذكر نفسه هو المحدث.

Silence of God is an Idea development by the Jahmis.
Even in the tampered books waved around by certain people still shows that this concept of God going silent goes against Him actually being God. Yet, it has been said:

الفتاوى(6/179)
(...... فثبت بالسنة والإجماع أن الله يوصف بالسكوت)
That Silence is an attribute of God by those who have went astray!

Reminder of the class schedules:
Monday Night 10 pm EST Bulugh al Maram
Tuesday 9-12: Bayqunyyah, Waraqat & Al Mukhtasar AsSagher. 12-1 : Mahalli on Minhaj. Wednesday 9-12: Nuzhah, Luma & Muqaddimah Hadrumyyah. 12-1: we will be adding Sharh al Manhaj InshaAllah

We have stated in the past and will continue to do so; that Assim in an Imam in Quran.
We narrate from him and are proud of it!
Our chain goes through legendary scholars of Quran! Assims weakness in Hadith doesn’t mean weakness on Quran.
Those of the atheists that try to use this only expose their own ignorance!
We shall not fall in their webs and twist facts to refute the ignorant!
A firefighter might know how to hold a pistol, but he is no officer!

I never said this was my Ijazah.
And yes, Farid and his fans only brought up qualification when they were exposed. It was a deflection method; yet Alhamedullah we have continually exposing them. From their most knowledgeable to Farid. As for this small piece pf paper I never said Ijazah.
I said: It never hurts to share something from my past.
How did the blur happen? Seriously I think it was load quality meaning you need to select high quality. Other suggest other possibilities.

Claims ليس بحافظ means not on the level of the Huffadh Yet ; this isn’t correct
ليس بحافظ وصالح الحديث وليس بقوي all refer to used with others not alone
اي للاعتبار فقط
Ibn Abi Hatim points out

It is sad that I have to repeat Elementry issues over and over and over and over!
But when you hear their arguments ;
1. They recognize the khilaf!
Well that’s it!

https://twitter.com/alminhaji/status/1493241534053036037

2. Subay’i said he was a good in Quran that doesn’t entail a rejection, nor does it an acceptance.
Seriously this is pathetic!
3. They gathered along list of things All of it is nonsense! Waste of time and energy!
I gave them a shot they blew it and exposed their lvl!

وقال أبو حاتم الرازي : ليس بالحافظ، وهو لين، تعرف حفظه وتُنكر قال ابن القطان الفاسي : "هذا قد يقال لمن غيره أحفظ منه"

Ivn Khuzaymah was heavily influenced by Ibn Karram , they were close pals!
As you can see Ibn Hajar affirming that which al hakim said. During this time Ibn Khuzaymah started fighting with his students calling them Kullabis!
Which is known as a term used by Ibn Karram, as he called those refuting him Kullabi!

They say: Why don’t you say about Knowledge what you say about Yad?!
We say: we say the same exact thing!
You see Allahs knowledge means to us He knows.
But by definition that is not what knowledge is, it is a byproduct of knowledge! We get what was meant by it, but we don’t know it.
Same with Yad, same with Ilm.

No Imam is above the laws of Islam. If we do stumble upon something that seems off, we do not slander, rather we accuse our intellect first.
Second we wait for clarification. Third we know all humans make mistakes and errors. So when we come upon something let’s say Ibn Khuzaymah error;
And Ibn Abi Hatim literally saying: Why in the world would Ibn Khuzaymah get into something we have not studied!
Or Ibn Khuzaymah him self saying: Oh how I wished that I would have listened to Rabee

قال في (المنهاج) في كتاب الاعكتاف : لِطَلَبِ لَيْلَةِ الْقَدْرِ، وَمَيْلُ الشَّافِعِيِّ رَحِمَهُ اللهُ إِلَى أَنَّهَا لَيْلَةُ الحَادِي أَوِ الثَّالِثِ وَالْعِشْرِينَ. ففي (العجالة): لِطَلَبِ لَيْلَةِ الْقَدْرِ،أي ليقومها،قال الله تعالى:{لَيْلَةُ الْقَدْرِ خَيْرٌ مِنْ أَلْفِ شَهْرٍ} (1012) أي خير من العمل في ألف شهر ليس فيها ليلة القدر، وفي الصحيح: [مَنْ قَامَ لَيْلَةَ الْقَدْرِ إِيْمَانًا وَاحْتِسَابًا غُفِرَ لَهُ مَا تَقَدَّمَ مِنْ ذَنْبِهِ]

والثالثة: كون الخلاف فيه قوليًا؛ أي: من قول (الإمام الشافعي) أو من أقواله، لا من الأوجه التي ذكرها أصحابه.
والرابعة: ظهور المقابل؛ يعني أن المقابل ظاهر في نفسه، وإن كان المعتمد في الفتوى والحكم على الأظهر. قالوا: وجملة ما في (المنهاج) من التعبير بـ(الأظهر) أربعمائة إلا خمسة:
منها: التعبير بـ(أظهرها) في موضعين: أحدهما في الرهن، والآخر في الوصايا.
ومنها: التعبير بـ(أظهرهما) في كتاب العتق في فصل أعتق في مرض موته.

اتفق أصحاب الحديث أن أبا الحسن علي بن إسماعيل الأشعري رضي الله عنه كان إماما من أئمة أصحاب الحديث ومذهبه مذهب أصحاب الحديث، تكلم في أصول الديانات على طريقة أهل السنة، ورد على المخالفين من أهل الزيغ والبدعة وكان على المعتزلة والروافض والمبتدعين من أهل القبلة والخارجين من الملة، سيفا مسلولا، ومن طعن فيه أو قدح أو لعنه أو سبه.. فقد بسط لسان السوء في جميع أهل السنة.

Did you know: Heretics of our time believe the Quran is Created!
They say: His Kalam is not created but the Quran is Muhdath!
Yet the salaf said who ever says this is a Kafir! They try to loop around an say: Well we redefine Muhdath!
Odd right?!
It’s like 1+1=3
When we say wrong, they say: we changed the value of 1!

Why I say to my son Malik: “go to bed”
I am now writing to you that I say/said to my son: “go to bed”
When I said “go to bed” the second time, it wasn’t the exact words I used for the first time.
They look alike but they are two different sentences. The second expresses the first.
And the first expresses the verbal command I gave.

InshaAllah After Iftar I will write a thorough thread on Kalam.
Many speaking on the matter are all over the map!
This issue honestly is very very simple!
It is the over thinking and reading of random quotes is what causes this confusion. Many times it is the random quotes with out understanding the mind set and contexts of those very quotes.
These statements are usually used as propaganda tool for deviants.
Those unaware usually fall victim! Because they assume they are following the SALAF

FYI: the word كيفية in the quotes of the Salaf does not mean the HOW he with his being does it! No no no!
This is the lie you been fed.
As for the truth, well it simply means they know nothing more beyond that.
Take Bukhari for example saying Allah Has Hadath… wait What does he mean? He says: His hadath is his creation.
This would help us understand alot!