How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
https://twitter.com/iconnnorpop/status/1969412000787616147
Here are some of my lecture slides on the topic: 


https://twitter.com/AndrewRillera/status/1954986784884133944But there are some who get that *that* is what may be the silver bullet against PSA. Gathercole is going to be catching strays now b/c PSA defenders are having to reject Gathercole's careful def of “substitution” since they seem to agree that G’s substitution is not in the NT. 2/


https://twitter.com/PLeithart/status/1954879722669707473re the burnt offering see LotF, 30n11 & pg 90. (I also suggest reading Jonathan Klawans’ books on sacrifice.) Regardless, even if we say the burnt offering always atones, it’s still not atoning *people*, but rather the altar. (I’ll return to this point since PL contests this.)
https://twitter.com/freganmitts/status/1862909916739977411If God/Christ is "all things in all things" (1 Cor 15:28; Col 3:11) & "in him all things in heaven & on earth r recapitulated" (Eph 1:10) & his "Body is the fullness of the One who fills all things in all things" (1:23), then our relation to Christ guarantees our relation to all.
https://twitter.com/MikeSington/status/1854575891214479861all want to be the superior big brain credited w any "success" that happens & reject any responsibility for any mistake. They fear being "wrong" so much that their go-to blame deflecting finger pointing defence mechanism (usually pointed at "the Left") will be toward each other.+
https://twitter.com/AndrewRillera/status/1837165614290374785
These Sabbath disputes are intra-Jewish debates over proper *halakha* (torah-observance) by discerning which command overrides others when in conflict. Jesus isn't saying, “no more halakha.” Rather, these scenes establish the *halakhic legality* of Jesus's/his disciples' actions.
![The fundamental task of disciples of Jesus is the bear witness to his Kingdom to all nations (Matt 28:18–20). The Apostle Paul describes Christians as divine royal ambassadors (2 Cor 5:20). Most of the people we read about in Scripture did not get invited by the worldly powers to have a voice at their table. Jesus and Paul did not have an “official” voice. But some people did get invited by the worldly powers to have an official voice[...]and they used it as simply one more way to speak as ambassadors for the Kingdom of God — and crucially, they remained loyal to their Kingdom allegiance ev...](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GVMnjNvXYAAkErR.jpg)
https://twitter.com/adencotterill/status/1824070801999503423This all is obvs too much for a literal 3 yr old (esp. all at once). The way I recall talking w our kids when they were that young is basically just points 1–3: God loves all creation & nothing can stop God's love. Not our mistakes & not even death. We know this bc of Jesus.
https://twitter.com/AndrewRillera/status/1788047577612464438Since Gathercole has already set the definitions and agenda for the substitution discussion, we (at least "we" scholars and theologians in the guilds) need to have this discussion on these terms. Anything else and we'll be speaking past each other—speaking different dialects.+
https://twitter.com/dorhamidbar/status/1779590296537579811J was expected to return: Act 1:11 & 3:20–21. But I think these texts—Mt 26:64; 28:18; Lk 22:69; Acts 1:9–10; 2:31–35; 7:55–56—indicate that "coming on the clouds" corresponds exactly to Dn 7:13–14, which is an ascension/enthronement to receive "authority."
https://x.com/AndrewRillera/status/1779524128212722103
https://twitter.com/AndrewRillera/status/1778934848456957966it’s noteworthy that it does not appear 1) in any relation to the apostolic kerygma, 2) as the grounds for basic "ethic" of conforming to Jesus' death in any NT text, or 3) as the grounds for the gentile mission. But it's these v things that those who think imminence is "core”+
https://twitter.com/AndrewRillera/status/1691176578347339777If I say, "one man’s act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all" you'd know I'm clearly a universalist, but if I point out Paul said this in Rom 5:18, then it's suddenly "underdetermined/ambiguous."
https://twitter.com/AndrewRillera/status/1441773640547139585
https://twitter.com/AndrewRillera/status/1636060710445932546I conclude in my diss that this is the v schema Paul is directly opposing in Romans. This is the view of the person Paul addresses & corrects in Rom 2:1, 3, &17ff. *But even if u don't agree w that*, I want to show how Rom 2 is fundamentally incompatible w the rest of the letter.