I have noticed recently that people are finally starting to understand that a civil case before a criminal is still very much a thing.

Now that conversation has switched to 1669.5 (voided contract law)🤦‍♀️

Attached is an essay written around 2010. 12 years later there are still no cases cited. Exclusions of 1669.5 c)This section does not apply to a contract for the payment of money or other consideration made from a nonrevocable trust established for the benefit of the minor if the alleged perpetrator has no direct or

❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌
This right here👇🏼is why MJ had no choice to settle.What’s lacking on both sides of the debate,is true comprehension of our justice system

Google will almost always do more harm than good if that’s what you’re depending on to educate yourself on the laws What happened to MJ is considered unjust by today’s legal standards.
Johnnie Cock-In-His-Hands, couldn’t figure out the right legal argument to fight this and win. Eventually,someone’s attorney did their homework and now the precedent used,that JCIHH missed,proves it as unjust.

HERE IT IS MJ ADVOCATES, THE TRUTH with receipts!

How much did MJ pay the Chandlers in ‘93?

The docs alone prove Diane Diamond wrong.

If you just read what’s right in front of your faces it clearly proves DD to be a LIAR! Continue....