How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
 
     
        https://twitter.com/antweegonus/status/1960806280328540437
 Job, afflicted by Satan (Jb 1:12), longed for death: “Why did I not perish at birth, and die as I came from the womb? . . . Now I would be lying down and quiet; I would be asleep; then I would be at rest . . . Or why was I not buried like a stillborn child, like an infant that never sees the light? There the wicked cease from troubling, and there the weary are at rest.” (Jb 3:11-17)
          Job, afflicted by Satan (Jb 1:12), longed for death: “Why did I not perish at birth, and die as I came from the womb? . . . Now I would be lying down and quiet; I would be asleep; then I would be at rest . . . Or why was I not buried like a stillborn child, like an infant that never sees the light? There the wicked cease from troubling, and there the weary are at rest.” (Jb 3:11-17) 
       
         - Leo begins by connecting two ostensibly separate conflicts currently underway: the war against divine authority, and that against civil power. The two struggles are really one, the latter proceeding directly from the former. Having first rebelled against God, popular passions now reject every restraint.
          - Leo begins by connecting two ostensibly separate conflicts currently underway: the war against divine authority, and that against civil power. The two struggles are really one, the latter proceeding directly from the former. Having first rebelled against God, popular passions now reject every restraint.

 
      https://twitter.com/matthiasellis/status/1869246909585772883The Social Network is pretty obviously about the main character’s strained personal relationships. It has f*** all to do with “what was going on in 2010”—it doesn’t even take place in 2010!
 
        
 
          https://x.com/Antweegonus/status/1835449007839027691
 
        
 Like anything else in the study of history, context is everything. As we saw e.g. with Pearl Harbor, to understand the decisions of military planners we must know the information available at the time and their key operating assumptions.
          Like anything else in the study of history, context is everything. As we saw e.g. with Pearl Harbor, to understand the decisions of military planners we must know the information available at the time and their key operating assumptions.https://x.com/Antweegonus/status/1663311559723040769
https://twitter.com/drproudman/status/1710707717520703813
 
        https://twitter.com/helen_of_roy/status/1696605022430072993


 Machiavelli famously divides leaders into the two broad categories of Foxes, who rely on wit and subterfuge to achieve their goals; and Lions, who rely on strength, force, and stubbornness. It's obvious which type corresponds most closely to the modern American elite.
          Machiavelli famously divides leaders into the two broad categories of Foxes, who rely on wit and subterfuge to achieve their goals; and Lions, who rely on strength, force, and stubbornness. It's obvious which type corresponds most closely to the modern American elite. 
       
         Teresa was one day in prayer, and with no warning found herself transported. Highly advanced in prayer and already well-attuned to the divine voice, she understood immediately that it was God’s will that she “should see the place which the devils kept in readiness for [her].”
          Teresa was one day in prayer, and with no warning found herself transported. Highly advanced in prayer and already well-attuned to the divine voice, she understood immediately that it was God’s will that she “should see the place which the devils kept in readiness for [her].” 
       
        
 
       
         The common mythology of Pearl Harbor goes something like this:
          The common mythology of Pearl Harbor goes something like this: 
       
         I previously discussed the long and abiding influence of Unitarianism on American history as the primary religious progenitor of modern Progressivism (see threads linked here for an introduction to the topic, though they only scratch the surface)
          I previously discussed the long and abiding influence of Unitarianism on American history as the primary religious progenitor of modern Progressivism (see threads linked here for an introduction to the topic, though they only scratch the surface)https://twitter.com/antweegonus/status/1649975784881152002
 
        https://twitter.com/Antweegonus/status/1649975784881152002As Moldbug maintains, the generational victories of liberal protestantism are essentially adaptive rather than conscious processes. In other words, there are contingent societal forces placing selective pressure on ever-more liberal mutations of the same liberal gene.
 
       
         First, on Protestantism generally:
          First, on Protestantism generally: