What we believe shapes our science more than our science shapes what we believe.
If media, academia and celebrity/popular-culture now exercise the foremost shaping effect on our collective beliefs, this essentially means these forces are orienting our scientific ‘path’.
The question then becomes, is media, academia, celebrity/popular culture composed of a representative sample of ideologies, mindsets, orientations?
Or does it seem as if gatekeeping methods have served to monopolize these spheres, granting undeserved influence to a small subset?
And if we accept that these spheres now seem unnaturally composed of almost exclusively one *type*, does this not mean that even what we today call ‘science’ is being largely piloted/driven by the same hidden (monied) hands responsible for this gatekeeper-induced monopolization?
powerfully - unchecked - to the far left.. as communist/stasi elements all over the world became further empowered: the ‘good guys’.
*International bankers won the war*, these ‘intelligence agencies’ have since been their greatest weapons, and we’re all now paying the price.
I (sincerely) don’t care if this idea is unpopular in certain circles.. these aren’t circles I wish to be a part of anymore. The hour is too late, the situation too dire.. delusions are now an existential threat.
The OSS/CIA is a corrupt, subversive, loathsome institution.
Movies and television programming require a suspension of judgment to be enjoyed - we immerse and lose ourselves in the unfolding story.
Because our habits so shape us, is this process not *training* the mind to suspend judgment and independent thinking, and embrace stagecraft?
One of the most disturbing trends I've noticed accelerating over recent years is a *profound* decrease in our ability to discern real from fake, or truthful from deceptive.. I'm not referring to the words being said, but rather intonation, body language, 'micro-expressions'...
and how could one hope to master this type of discernment, when the majority of the sensory input they're taking in involves actors and actresses, writers and directors.. whose very role is to convincingly mimic genuineness and sincerity, and thus blur that line?
Obsession with 'racism' represents the fruits of a new quasi-religion, developed by/for the Godless.
It's tenets allow only positive things to be said about certain races, only negative things to be said of another, and the end goal is total inversion of the power structure.
It's not just the race they want dead and gone forever, but it's history, culture, belief structures - it's very *nature*.
This is happening across all western nations, and might be thought of as 'colonialism' of int'l finance, with minority groups used as foot soldiers.
The difficulty is that a significant percentage of this indoctrinated army are not 'evil', but rather being taken advantage of, in the manner of useful idiots.. like troops fighting for a corrupt and deceitful general, whose true intentions they don't understand.
When the purchased-press covers any ‘conspiracy theory’, almost without exception it’s a mischaracterization of an exaggeration of a mischaracterized exaggeration.. leading to an end-product headline so absurd that the public becomes ashamed to be associated with it.
‘the most powerful banking families now have such unchecked power and control that even much of the military-industrial complex, including new space-based weaponry, is directly or indirectly under their sway,’
‘Jewish space lasers!!’
.. opening the door to mockery
‘The owners and operators of this business seem to have unique/extensive ties to both child predators and traffickers, and an undeniable overlap with their ‘culture’, demanding investigation’
‘Hillary Clinton eats and sells children from a basement in a pizza shop’
Jan Ott, the capable man behind the upcoming translation of the Oera Linda book, is one of those impressive people that so often go ‘unsung’ due to a quiet modesty..
He’s been handling all things OLB practically on his own, in preparing the book for publication, and
ensuring relevant and reliable research material is available online.
I often receive outreach from skilled individuals looking for ways to help, in the broadest sense - this would be a great opportunity to do so, in a meaningful way:
Web design, layout, content display
and organization isn’t his specialty, and because he has so much else on his plate, I thought I’d put the word out - in hopes that someone with the skill set and willingness to help might reach out to him.
I’d personally appreciate it.
As our world crumbles, and a handful of parasitic jackals (and their errand-boys and useful idiots) set the world on fire in attempt to retain undeserved power, life can become profoundly *draining*.
For what it’s worth - remember that *you* are in control of your inputs.
Remember that, at any time, you can simply shut out these informational inputs designed to grind the human spirit to dust.
Am I suggesting that not paying any attention to the world is the ideal?
Absolutely not. As with so much else, a balance seems best:
Take in enough
to have some firm understanding of what’s going on, while making certain you don’t lose yourself in hundreds of redundant examples of the darkness we’re facing. There’s nothing to be gained from swimming in infuriating and demoralizing material -
The ascendancy of men like Saul Alinsky as foundational political philosophers marked the beginning of the end of all hopes of truthfulness or decency in politics because his particular brand of shrewd intelligence chose to frame all politics as a by-any-means-necessary
power struggle, in the manner of an alien people or culture seeking to subvert an enemy population.
Devoid of any strong love for nation, or culture, or a belief in God - or any fundamental reason or desire to *better* the world - his ‘rules for radicals’ playbook so heavily
employed since publication taught his acolytes to get all they could, when and where they could, by hook or by crook.. and that some vaguely positive-sounding ends justified the means.
He recognized that to succeed, in a technical sense, the fundamental healthy orientation
For anyone that hasn't followed the election happenings closely, a summary:
Biden starts out with an early lead across the board, due to (as the networks mention over and over again) the counting of the mail-in votes early.
After roughly half of the non mail-in votes are
tallied in most key states, Biden's lead has evaporated completely, and many states flip to Trump.
It's clear who's going to win. I call it, many others call it, betting markets call it (Trump becomes an 8 to 1 favorite, from his starting point as a 3 to 1 underdog).
Things then begin to get very strange.
Vote counting essentially stops in most key states, and CNN and others begin to suddenly claim the mail-in vote WASN'T actually tallied yet, but rather remains to be counted.
From this point forward, nearly every vote tallied in
Pull back and consider the conception of television, broadly:
Most people now have one as the looming dominant centerpiece of their living area, much like an altar, where people spend much of their day taking in programming (such a key word).. which they actually *pay* for.
Not a collection of disparate voices, opinions, people and ideas.. but a relatively unified and singular culture and ideology being pushed across every major network.
It’d be all but impossible to dream up a more effective and efficient indoctrination mechanism.
When you begin to watch shows like John Oliver (or any of the clones) and connect the dots that comedy wasn’t the purpose or intent, but merely the *mask* and vehicle, the spoonful of sugar to help the medicine go down, the insidiousness of it all begins to fully register.
An illustration of just how far we've shifted in recent decades:
Several decades ago, if someone were to create an institution devoted to racial and gender equality, and a 'colorblind' environment designed to ensure no people received preferential treatment over another,
this would've been viewed as a strongly left-leaning construct, aimed at dismantling the perceived white-male patriarchy.. and a social-justice mechanism.
If someone were to such an institution today, and it pursued exactly these aims, it'd quickly be deemed the most racist,
sexist, transphobic institution in the nation.
It'd have to fight to end race-based organizations, which solely advocate for their own self-interest and power gains at the expense of other groups, and organizations like 'BLM' and 'La Raza' would need to be early targets.
The marionettes responsible for cultivating this new grievance ideology/industry, and the conception of endless-protest without tangible goal or end-point, laid the foundation by first framing all power as *privilege*, not responsibility..
*projection*, to the highest degree, from a people whose holy book speaks of other peoples as cattle and celebrates slavery.. a people that have historically exercised power not as benevolent father, but as a means of parasitically extracting value from those under their sway
This new ideology created a new power hierarchy based on perceived-oppression, and spent years manipulatively (and deceptively) firing the most impressionable and ignorant into a hateful frenzy - to act as frontline foot-soldiers, in this coup.
The Schiff/Rothschild/Warburg animosity towards the Romanov line seems to have begun in earnest in 1815, when Alexander Romanov boldly stood up to them at the Congress of Vienna in 1815, and encouraged other leaders to do the same. (1)
The Romanovs and Russia were the last holdout against the establishment of a central bank in their lands, and even supported (along with Otto von Bismarck) America's attempt to break free with the printing of the 'Greenback', a promising idea that died with Lincoln. (2)
What followed was decades of assassination attempts in Russia, well-financed revolutionary movements, culminating in the clumsy murder of the entire Romanov family in a dirty basement in 1918, under the direct orders of Schiff.
The 'expert' class, 'intellectuals', have led the western world into endless wars, financial indentured-servitude, and the most corrupt culture-destroying era in modern history.
There's been efforts to channel resulting frustration into a reactionary (1)
aw-shucks Sarah Palin'esque movement to mistrust anyone that can read and write. This is dangerous.
Abandon and actively mistrust self-described 'intellectuals', but never *intellect*... self-described 'experts', but never expertise. The problem hasn't been that the capable (2)
seek to rule the less capable, but rather the direct inverse. These individuals are largely incompetent in their appointed roles. Our 'elite' class is now almost wholly a product of cronyism and corruption, a kakistocracy not a meritocracy. (3)