Just a handful of decades ago, in the 1950's, America was approximately 90% White.. built as a nation of European immigrants, nearly the entire 10% remainder represented the descendants of the (shamefully) imported slave population, from Africa.

Remember this, when the institutionally captured media/Hollywood attempts to sell the lie that we've always been a 'nation of immigrants from all over the world' - we were a nation of Europeans, who heavily restricted migration from all deeply foreign cultures/nations, because it seemed positively insane to our high-context historically-astute founders (and their offspring) to embrace any other policy.

Since the passing of the Hart-Celler act, White Americans now make up just 60% of the population their fathers built.. and not only are these numbers declining relative to the tens of millions of imported third world populations, but also in absolute terms, as the White birth rate itself is now - for the first time - showing negative growth.

We all know the score - please pardon the depressing reminder of our monumental late-stage-empire blunders, of unprecedented magnitude - and I think we're finally on the brink of reversing this tide, and finding a new path forward..

the purpose of this post isn't so much this upsetting data, but the interesting infographics in the next post, showing the settlement patterns of the European Americans who collectively built this great nation...


The Germans, the English, and the Irish, were the three major northwestern European populations that flocked to America in her infancy - followed by several cousin peoples...

They'd go on to collectively create the greatest economic and military superpower in recorded history.

Simply put, a leading reason I believe creating parallel structure is the most viable path forward:

Our system is collapsing utterly, because corrupt, incompetent, irrevocably flawed.
Why fight to take over a crumbling edifice?

Why not create anew, according to lessons learned? There's no ceiling/limit to just how much these parallel constructs might accomplish, long term, because countless 'pockets' might be built, then gradually and seamlessly networked together..

This isn't a mere 'escape' for those seeking total passivity.. immense potential, here.

My last post regarding the slaughter of the Romanov family seems to have animated some mixture of marxists and bolsheviks, trans flags, atheists and satanists, anarchists..

the most defining trait of these, viewed broadly as a group, seems to be this:

They seem utterly incapable of grasping the conception of what Kingship and Nobility (and even the very notion of hierarchy) initially meant to ancient peoples.

University professors, broadly speaking, now teach that these European Nobles and Aristocrats were the root of all evil - of all oppression, mistreatment, self-serving abuse.. the truth is that many of these same college professors are the cultural (often even ethnic) descendants of the vastly worse and more corrupt forces that took the place of these unjustly deposed Nobles, once their ancestors had stoked a public hatred sufficient to cause their brutal murders, to successfully get them out of the way.

Yes, it's true that Royal lineages have been deeply corrupted, in recent centuries, some of whom seem to have practically made a 'deal with the devil'.. the decline of London has long epitomized this. It's easy to have a negative view of the Nobility - not simply due to the propaganda we're all now immersed in, but due to many of their own very real failings.. especially since that corruption/subversion began in such earnest.

That said, a King or Monarch in healthier conditions and healthier times (and especially within a homogeneous environment, in which a nation shares familial bonds) was seen by many as something like a father of a household - the foremost and idealized representative of a family of peoples.. and the best of these deeply cared about their people.

There's a reason these Nobles were targeted above all other groups, by the upstarts who now wield such immense power. That 'father' figure needed to be either co-opted or completely eliminated, to open the door for the Larry Finks, Rothschilds, Soros' and Warburgs of the world to monopolistically take the helm.

The Romanovs stood openly opposed to the central banking cabal, for example.. and were never forgiven for this.

Far leftist 'intellectuals', who've completely taken over the sphere of 'higher education', gradually convinced a subset of the public to despise - with the deepest hateful passion - the one group that had any hope of standing in the way of these malevolent parasitic forces.

Ask yourself:
Now that we've everywhere murdered and dethroned our Nobles and Aristocrats, deposed Monarchs and Kings, and now live in a world dominated by a self-interested merchant class and international finance - is the world the better for it?

Are we headed in a positive direction, as result? Let's say the bolshe/marxist one day got everything they wished for.. lets say everything and everyone healthy or beautiful or well-constituted or blessed with innate gifts was completely obliterated, every Christian murdered, every non-Jewish White male disempowered - and they were able to place their own monstrous little troll(s) in a position of power..

their ideology would never let them rest, because it's a permanent 'revolutionary spirit' (as E Michael Jones well speaks to) with no end point, no goal, that forever takes aim at leadership.. even at 'bests' and 'ideals'.

In a very real sense, it's the eternal rallying of the poorly constituted against the healthy.. it's the single most dysgenic philosophy ever concocted, and it dooms such people to endless, eternal chaos.

What they seem to miss is that this philosophy wasn't designed to create a healthy and happy world - it was designed by the most malevolent men as a weapon to destroy an opposition force.

Those who buy into this ideology become mere tools used to help facilitate a wholesale transfer of power - to some of the worst men our world has ever seen.

The firestorm this video kicked off is that type I find the most fascinating..

I see decent people on both sides completely misunderstanding one another, talking past one another.

I'd suggest a leading reason many good people find it off-putting is simple:

Our culture has so clearly been erased, and replaced.
What 'Gemini' is doing to images of Western mankind, is what a certain powerful subset has been doing to our culture - for decades, now.
Cheapening, disempowering, erasing.

Subconsciously, so many of us recognize that we had our own culture, once, and thus didn't have to ape those of others.. and it was a beautiful thing. I don't even necessarily fault the girls 'just having fun' -in a parched desert completely lacking in sustenance, we're naturally going to reach out for whatever is there.. ghetto culture has been made so dominant and all pervasive that it's often all they know.
Ask a college girl to dance, there's an excellent chance she's going to start some variant of 'twerking'.

There are hundreds of dance styles, countless types of music, endless ways to unwind, have fun - I can understand the disappointment with the fact that this seems to be the one the vast majority of girls are now so conditioned into walking.

Right or wrong, most of the girls in this video will be seen by most men as short term conquests, adventures, to be tossed aside once the fun has been had..
The alternative - especially because it's become so rare - is immensely attractive, by contrast.

Having some sense of grace, modesty and femininity is what the vast majority of men seek in someone they care to spend the rest of their lives with.

This seems to be one of the more major rifts on the right, sadly..

One group claiming wildly disproportionate Jewish power is being used to disempower native populations and spread anti-White and anti-Western-culture hatred - another claiming all women are the real culprits..

every last one of them, apparently.
They even puppet the Federal reserve, and the Rothschilds!

There's no doubt we've completely lost touch with healthy masculinity, and the better aspects of our patriarchal heritage - and that our world is being swiftly 'feminized', made weak and soft and genuinely pathetic, by so many objective measures.. but in my opinion this point of view often misses that healthy femininity can (and does) actually still exist, and cultivating healthy and happy women who are a profound net-positive to the world is still possible.

I'm baffled by this urge to drive a wedge between our men and women at this all important moment in time, with such massive problems before us, such incredibly powerful enemies, who so obviously seek to disempower/destroy us..

You folks do realize we need these people to make more people, yes?

Perhaps instead of tossing them to the dogs, we attempt to help 'fix' them, and encourage their better natures to come to the fore?

https://twitter.com/0x49fa98/status/1733126637233799227

Lovecraft can be witty and insightful from time to time, from all I've seen.. I've certainly appreciated some of his posts.

Stuff like this - and this recent broader push to stoke hatred between the sexes - baffles me.. and it's such a terrible path forward.

In rightist circles, should women be our leading influencers, leaders, thinkers, etc? Absolutely not, in my opinion.. yet I'd suggest that the healthiest feminine instinct - playing its timeless, natural role - is not to be this.

It's a very modern notion.. and simply requires a change in approach and thinking to remedy.

The IQ debate is an interesting one.. I started my own journey with a powerful fascination with the concept, but have come to reject both ‘extremes’:

Yes, IQ *does* (however imperfectly) help measure something real - we know this because it’s a reliable predictor of several
(1) things, including a vast swathe of things we consider negative (criminality, out of wedlock births, etc), and an equally large handful of things we consider positive. It’s a better predictor than socio-economic status.. and any data point that so powerfully correlates with
(2)

I see ‘Nazis’, ‘Project Paperclip’, ‘Waffen SS’, all trending.. many on the right feel this is the way to score cheap political points, following the lead of the left, and labeling everyone they don’t like a ‘Nazi’. It’s embarrassing. Trudeau is not far right - and in fact,
(1) he’s *aggressively* anti-White, and seems to worship and serve the financial forces the National Socialists so despised.

A reminder that it might be fairly said that we don’t have a single genuinely ‘far right’ leader in the US, or perhaps anywhere in the western world,
(2)

The Swastika was an ancient symbol held near and dear by peoples as far back as our historical record stretches.

Using WW2 as an excuse to completely bury it - to obscure it's significance to our ancestors, it's authentic history - represents either a judgment error, or a lie.
No single symbol has been loaded with more negative energy, more baggage or misapprehension, in recent decades.

What does it mean for a people when such a key symbol is suddenly morphed into something representing pure evil - the polar opposite of it's original significance?

I'm seeing this 'thinking about ancient Rome' meme take flight, even amongst the Reddit-tier crowd.

Rome does deserve immense respect. Her greatest leaders were truly great men, her historical peaks were lofty, her staying power was essentially unrivalled in all of history..
(1) but, I'd like to give some credit to those who casually waltzed in and obliterated her - numerous times - via Brennus and the early Celts, the Visigoths and Alaric, The Vandal Genseric, the Ostrogothic Totila - yet whose history has somehow fallen into a black hole, since.
(2)

Related to the last post:

I can understand why many good people have been drawn to libertarianism, across recent decades.. if we look around us, in our crumbling and increasingly chaotic multicultural environments, we see that the traditional concept of a ‘nation’ has been
(1) essentially obliterated.. That nations are no longer a group of kindred peoples with strong natural bonds, a people of similar culture and lineage, with a shared history, and a resulting social cohesion - nations are now essentially open air shopping malls, into which anyone
(2)

One of my biggest annoyances is watching the kosher conservative element speak of economic or political systems/structures as of these are the all-important determinant of a nations health or success..

I can’t speak to this point often enough:
(1) Such systems/structures/frameworks are not only vastly less important, but also wholly *dependent upon*, a nations *people*.. the type and caliber of human being any given nation has to work with.

Making Haiti the absolute ideal capitalist democracy would not quickly or
(2)

A main tactic of the kosher-conservative element is to pretend political/economic *systems* are more important than a nations *people*, with regard to whether they thrive/flourish, or collapse.

They buy into the narrative that democracy and capitalism was the magic formula,
(1) *with* which any nation is guaranteed to reach their peak, *without* which they’re doomed..

To anyone with even a basic historical understanding, this concept is totally absurd.

There are democracies with relatively free markets in some of the poorest places in the world
(2)

So many today make the mistake of thinking the best way to cultivate a truthful understanding of history is to aim for the most recent works - this is completely backward.

The field is now *dominated* by partisan actors - highly political, dogmatic, and increasingly dishonest. I'd long wondered why topics like the Goths, for example, have become absolute black holes, in recent decades - until I started to come upon articles speaking to how they were 'used by the Nazis', and 'problematic'.

Think of what's actually being said, here..

So many of us seem to have an extremely simplistic and one-dimensional view of what it means to be kind, civil, big-hearted.

If you have a drug addict recidivist criminal at your door and you grant him a place to stay, you could call this kindness..
(1) If you have children in your home, *it's the opposite*.. you're actively putting them in danger.

This is the microcosm of the macro picture of nations and migration. One's 'kindness' and signaled virtue doesn't threaten to destroy their own life, but rather an entire nation.
(2)

So much depends on our ability and willingness to begin engaging with the ‘kosher right’ - the ‘gatekeeper’ subset.. the type that would have us focus exclusively on the puppets, and never follow the strings - or forever swat at branches, but never strike at the roots..
(1) the type that think making jokes about the Bidens is somehow a helpful net-positive, or that calling Democrats ‘the REAL racists’ is moving the ball forward.

They play purely political games, while our problems run far deeper (cultural, spiritual).. it’s tiresome to watch.
(2)

The left has its ‘biological gender doesn’t matter’ crowd
The right has its ‘biological race doesn’t matter’ crowd

Both are taught to ignore or deny the most plainly obvious realities for political reasons - both are embarrassing, unhelpful, and set us back decades. Argue that one should never hate along these lines, or seek to oppress or be unjust, and this is a worthy discussion - argue that it’s a completely meaningless label that we should pretend doesn’t exist, and it’s impossible for me to take you seriously anymore.

The phrase ‘it’s just..’ is one of the most mindless and stupid and destructive in our language.

*Anything* can be excused by aggressively minimizing and creating a caricature of it.. if we fail to pull back and view the broader picture, we devolve and degenerate incrementally. Many of us recognize how this has been used so oft in the sphere of ‘tolerance’ (it’s just baking a cake! It’s just gay marriage! It’s just minor attracted persons - they exist, bigot!), but look around - it’s absolutely everywhere. We’re now swimming in “it’s just”s.

I decided to play devil’s advocate to make an unpopular point, here.. and the results have been fascinating..

Some relatively minor dance at some random graduation definitely isn’t the very best ‘vehicle’ for this larger point, but what the responses reveal is disturbing:
(1)

https://twitter.com/ashalogos/status/1669915789896613889

I think a significant chunk of the population now has *absolutely no recognition* of the value/power of ritual - or its importance, or its role.

Among these, absolutely nothing is sacred.. and even the *conception* of the sacred is completely foreign, incomprehensible.
(2)

The latest audio cast, for those interested..

A discussion of all things parallel communities, and related cultural and historical topics that have been on my mind lately, as I finish a video on similar subject matter:
ashalogos.com/podcasts/newest For those interested in participating in parallel community efforts, here's the link to the place where the more serious work is being done.

If you're of like-mind, and looking to play some role in steering/advancing all of this, we'd love to have you:
guilded.gg/r/zzMlWZ7PLR?i…

Jared Diamond’s “Guns, Germs, and Steel” was one of those works that helped ‘break the spell’, for me - helped me realize just how partisan, dishonest, and manipulative modern academia had become.. and how important it was to start taking in such things with a grain of salt.
(1) The formula is one most are now familiar with:

A Jewish man/woman writes a book (or creates a movie, or documentary) that dismisses nearly all existing historical accounts using the claim that they’re ‘racist’, and proceeds to paint western mankind of prior ages as somehow
(2)

Our increasingly violent and third world streets - coupled with the total destruction of familial brotherhood, unity, cohesion - pushes us ever further into ‘fight or flight’ reactionary reptile brain, and massively diminishes our ability to tap into higher consciousness.. The more we live like animals, the more we gradually become animalistic in our modes of thinking and being, and the less we’re able to tap into that gifted higher nature that makes us so unique, sets us apart from the rest of creation.
High culture becomes an impossibility..